Calm down, bro.Compyfox wrote:What a way to tick off the KVR community and criticizing those that don't swim with the masses...
Ivan_C was and is right on this. No matter how taunting my analogy was.
Calm down, bro.Compyfox wrote:What a way to tick off the KVR community and criticizing those that don't swim with the masses...
I like this idea. Maybe a short vetting period where KVR can address any potential violations before the contest. Seems like a good solution, but it would require time. Perhaps a couple 'non-partial' volunteers could be assigned the task.Compyfox wrote:Maybe we need an additional layer of security during the submission period, or 1-3 days between the final day of the entry submission and the challenge voting process to check if all entries are legit. That assumes, that the people submitting already have a webpage and don't lie to the challenge hosts.
Quoted in case you decide to change this post.Compyfox wrote:I think I have made my point clear with editing my first post.
I still find it strange though. And in fact, since I can only vote for 5 plugins in this challenge, my points belong to other devs.
I think that'd be just Ben. I have nothing to do with the DC and to the best of my knowledge neither do the other mods. I could be mistaken about the other mods, but in any case I'd start with Ben, who can be contacted the same as always.Compyfox wrote:This is the thing... there are no ways of official contact.
I could indeed forward this to Ben (and the other mods) in the next 10 minutes... but I'm not envisioning any response anytime soon.
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement