Login / Register 0 items | $0.00 New @ KVR
User avatar
Enrize
KVRist
 
219 posts since 18 Jan, 2017

Postby Enrize; Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:08 pm Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

For the last few months i've been reading and watching a lot of how people reacts to Bitwig Studio (using hashtags, keywords, search queries etc on different social platforms).

I must admit that a lot of people very like Bitwig Studio but most of them switching back to their previous DAWs after some time because of the bad performance (GUI slowdown, CPU spikes etc). Probably it starts to happen when their projects become bigger.

So i know everyone is already aware of the problem. I just want to point out that this is probably the biggest reason why people switch back and this issues should be addressed with highest priority.

Cheers everyone!
SLiC
KVRAF
 
2481 posts since 2 Dec, 2004, from North Wales

Postby SLiC; Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:52 pm Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

Wasn’t this issue just with Macs? (Linked to an OS issue, I have head the same thing with some plugins like Avenger).

I can only say that on a PC with a decent graphics card I have never experienced any slowdown or CPU spike issues with the latest version.
Current Gear: i7 Win 10 + Surface, BWS, StudioOne 4, X32 Desk. Rubicon R8s, DM12, P8, Virus TI, System 1m, Korg ARP, P6, Eurorack, Elektron A4, RYTM, OT, MPC Live, OP-1, Mother 32, Dominion Club, Roland TD8 and HPD-20, Guitars, Basses and Amps
JHernandez
KVRist
 
129 posts since 6 Dec, 2017

Postby JHernandez; Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:03 pm Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

If the graphics are currently rendered entirely by the CPU what does your graphics card have to do with it, or Macs for that matter?
-JH
Zexila
KVRAF
 
2629 posts since 17 Mar, 2008

Postby Zexila; Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:44 pm Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

Can confirm spikes with few track projects on Windows, guess with more tracks is more annoying, It's shame they need new shinnie features to collect subscription, intsead focusing everything on optimizing this thing once and for all.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? :D ShawnG
ozinga
KVRist
 
106 posts since 12 Oct, 2003

Postby ozinga; Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:51 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

After finishing a fairly crowded song in BWS I went back to S1 due to slow response and cpu problems of the current version on mac. Instead of new featıres, devices I am hoping for a performance optinization focused update.
Oz
connmach
KVRist
 
116 posts since 4 Jun, 2016, from Berlin

Postby connmach; Thu Jun 14, 2018 2:49 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

I'm with SLiC on this one. Decent (not top notch) PC. Lots of 3rd party VST(i)'s, Lots of tracks.
Never experienced any slowdowns or CPU spike issues ever, not now (2.3.4) not when I started with Bitwig (1.3.14)

But I'm not superfluous dpi horny.
SLiC
KVRAF
 
2481 posts since 2 Dec, 2004, from North Wales

Postby SLiC; Thu Jun 14, 2018 3:04 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

JHernandez wrote:If the graphics are currently rendered entirely by the CPU what does your graphics card have to do with it, or Macs for that matter?



I dont know how how the graphics are rendered, the post seemed to insinuate there was an endemic probem, I am not sure that is the case, I (and others) dont have any issues at all and I am on an i7 PC and a i5 MS Surface Tablet.

Obviulsy some people are having problems some of the time, but it is helpful for the developers to identify what systems give issues, this can help narow it down/reproduce it so it can be fixed for those people.
Current Gear: i7 Win 10 + Surface, BWS, StudioOne 4, X32 Desk. Rubicon R8s, DM12, P8, Virus TI, System 1m, Korg ARP, P6, Eurorack, Elektron A4, RYTM, OT, MPC Live, OP-1, Mother 32, Dominion Club, Roland TD8 and HPD-20, Guitars, Basses and Amps
Bathrobe
KVRist
 
316 posts since 10 Oct, 2011

Postby Bathrobe; Thu Jun 14, 2018 3:25 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

Ohhh

For a moment there i had high hopes when i missread the topic

Quick heads up from Bitwig developers.

instead of

Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

:(
User avatar
antic604
KVRian
 
968 posts since 4 Jan, 2017, from Warsaw, Poland

Postby antic604; Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:27 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

It was confirmed several times in other threads that the issue (low performance in "big" projects) is directly related to rendering of the GUI being done by the CPU, using Cairo libraries which are best implemented in Linux, pretty well implemented in Windows and really poorly implemented for OSX.

So yeah, most of those complaints come from Mac users :(

And the devs said they're committed to fixing this by offloading (at least the most intensive parts of) GUI to GPU, which obviously takes time for a very small dev team working on 3 platforms.
Live 10 / Bitwig 2 / Reason 10 / Studio One 4
Music: https://soundcloud.com/antic604
JHernandez
KVRist
 
129 posts since 6 Dec, 2017

Postby JHernandez; Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:38 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

Thanks antic.
-JH
fwsuperhero
KVRist
 
287 posts since 26 Jul, 2012, from Prague, czech republic

Postby fwsuperhero; Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:58 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

Ive got two laptops, one is much better than the second one, but bitwig has glitchy gui on it (maybe because it has touch hd screen?). so i can understand why some people left bitwig. But it seems, cpu hungry is not the problem...
connmach
KVRist
 
116 posts since 4 Jun, 2016, from Berlin

Postby connmach; Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:26 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

antic604 wrote:So yeah, most of those complaints come from Mac users :(

True, but in all those (self repeating) threads there was also a consensus that it was due to the HiRez monitors. I thought every 40000000000k screen (specifically made for word processing, music composing and Youtube) had a sluggish response due to Cairo libraries and only using the CPU.

Mac users complain much faster and louder because of the mother lode of cash involved in those cases. :D

But I can be wrong. :phones:
User avatar
antic604
KVRian
 
968 posts since 4 Jan, 2017, from Warsaw, Poland

Postby antic604; Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:17 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

connmach wrote:
antic604 wrote:So yeah, most of those complaints come from Mac users :(

True, but in all those (self repeating) threads there was also a consensus that it was due to the HiRez monitors. I thought every 40000000000k screen (specifically made for word processing, music composing and Youtube) had a sluggish response due to Cairo libraries and only using the CPU.

Mac users complain much faster and louder because of the mother lode of cash involved in those cases. :D

But I can be wrong. :phones:


What do you want me to say?
- yes, the higher the res, the more burden is put on the CPU (taking it away from audio processing),
- the worse the implementation of Cairo, the sooner those problems rear their ugly head,
- the more you've spent on your machine, the louder you'll complain.

I'd love some iMac Pro user to post a screenshot of how Bitwig looks in full 5K res and in so-called 'low resolution' mode, because I'm pretty sure the latter still holds much better than the pixelated mess Reason is on high-DPI monitors... But maybe Cairo implementation on OSX is so bad, that even dropping down to low res mode doesn't help once the projects get bigger? I don't know, never owned Mac. And also size of the project differs by person - for me big project is 25-30 tracks (full of native instruments & effects, few VSTs, lots of automation, ideally all still in MIDI), for others they have 100+ tracks template with huge sample libraries, channel strips on every track, ozone plugins on every group, etc. before they even put a single note in.
Live 10 / Bitwig 2 / Reason 10 / Studio One 4
Music: https://soundcloud.com/antic604
JHernandez
KVRist
 
129 posts since 6 Dec, 2017

Postby JHernandez; Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:20 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

FWIW

1080 Asus MX279 monitor, 2010 Mac Pro with dual 6 core processors (12 core), 16 gig ram, on El Capitan. Mechanical drives, if that matters. Also, I'm not using my Apogee in this test, the audio output is set to the Asus monitor via Mini DisplayPort to HDMI.

Using Bitwig's "Sample Magic Demo by Hedflux" I duplicated all tracks and I stopped at 256 tracks.

At the very least I learned that CPU efficient (native BWS) devices/plugins and bouncing heavier plugins to audio are my friends. As long as I do that, I can run all the tracks I personally need, which is a lot less than 256 in my case. As you can see below I can get away with quite a bit more. Unless I'm overlooking something crucial?


Screen Shot 2018-06-14 at 1.57.36 PM.png



I did notice that when I switched to the mixer it took a second or two. I'm guessing it's because it had to draw all the channels while under the load, but the audio was consistant. Scrolling up and down is obviously not as smooth as a blank slate but it's not bothersome enough to slow me down either.


How do you fair in the same scenario on your set up? (Mac people) I get most of you likely have up to date machines, I'm just curious. Maybe there's something to be learned? :phones:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by JHernandez on Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:24 am, edited 4 times in total.
-JH
User avatar
pekbro
KVRAF
 
1797 posts since 29 Sep, 2010, from Maui

Postby pekbro; Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:48 am Re: Quick heads up for Bitwig developers.

I imagine its not about platform specific implementations, but more about platform
display resolutions. Its just a graphics library...
Next

Moderator: Bitwig Mods

Return to Bitwig