Early amp simulators comparison video
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 101 posts since 19 Jun, 2013
For fun, I compared some of the very first attempts to simulate guitar amps in software.
Five guitar plugins which are around 20 years old now.
Do you think that any of them still rock?
https://youtu.be/GIxxlO8xfFA
Five guitar plugins which are around 20 years old now.
Do you think that any of them still rock?
https://youtu.be/GIxxlO8xfFA
- KVRAF
- 1646 posts since 3 Sep, 2005 from Outer Bongolia
-
- KVRian
- 1181 posts since 27 May, 2008
Nothing that newer software coupled with it can't fix
- KVRian
- 1324 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from Italy
- KVRist
- 395 posts since 6 May, 2020
I just have a sweet spot for the mda Combo for some reason.
Take care
- KVRAF
- 3303 posts since 6 Jul, 2012 from Sick-cily
Warp still remains a little monster...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 101 posts since 19 Jun, 2013
Agreed, Warp Vst is excellent even today.
For all the other plugins in the comparison I really struggled to get something I'd be pleased with.
But with the Warp it was the other way round - I couldn't decide on the settings because I liked it in many different configurations.
It might not be the most realistic amp sim as per today but definitely makes you want to play your guitar through it.
For all the other plugins in the comparison I really struggled to get something I'd be pleased with.
But with the Warp it was the other way round - I couldn't decide on the settings because I liked it in many different configurations.
It might not be the most realistic amp sim as per today but definitely makes you want to play your guitar through it.
- KVRAF
- 1646 posts since 3 Sep, 2005 from Outer Bongolia
All those other sims would still stack up fairly well if run through either a better cab model or speaker IR.
I'd say speaker cab modeling has actually regressed since WarpVST, while speaker IR use has become far more widespread (it was actually available then, just not very widely used until about 15 years ago or so).
Need a hybrid — good IRs can really capture the sound of a cab, but they don't have the dynamics that good cab modeling (like in WarpVST) can provide.
I'd say speaker cab modeling has actually regressed since WarpVST, while speaker IR use has become far more widespread (it was actually available then, just not very widely used until about 15 years ago or so).
Need a hybrid — good IRs can really capture the sound of a cab, but they don't have the dynamics that good cab modeling (like in WarpVST) can provide.
-
- KVRAF
- 2063 posts since 14 Sep, 2004 from $HOME
Hey, what version of cubase is this? I had something similar looking in the 90s for a short time, but it only had very generic “rack”-like GUIs for plugins, horrible usability. My first tentative steps into digital recording after a Portastudio, I didn’t know shit about anything and I didn’t continue until SX3 (?).Monsum wrote: ↑Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:00 am For fun, I compared some of the very first attempts to simulate guitar amps in software.
Five guitar plugins which are around 20 years old now.
Do you think that any of them still rock?
https://youtu.be/GIxxlO8xfFA
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 101 posts since 19 Jun, 2013
It's a little brother of Cubase - Cubasis VST 5 (long before they started calling the mobile app this name).fese wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 4:49 pm Hey, what version of cubase is this? I had something similar looking in the 90s for a short time, but it only had very generic “rack”-like GUIs for plugins, horrible usability. My first tentative steps into digital recording after a Portastudio, I didn’t know shit about anything and I didn’t continue until SX3 (?).
This version is not that old, I believe it's from 2003.
All plugins that didn't have their own GUI received a generic one.
I liked Cubasis because it wasn't overloaded with unnecessary features and it was much cheaper.