Log InCreate An Account
  1. Plugins
  2. »
  3. Image Line
  4. »
  5. FL Studio Mobile
  6. »
  7. Reviews

FL Studio Mobile

FL Studio Mobile has an average user rating of 2.50 from 2 reviews

Rate & Review FL Studio Mobile

User Reviews by KVR Members for FL Studio Mobile

FL Studio Mobile

Reviewed By Wayfarer [all]
December 29th, 2016
Version reviewed: 3.x on Android

Being a long-time FL Studio user, I bought FL Studio Mobile as soon as it was available for Android - and was completely unimpressed. Far from being 'the fastest way from my brain to my speakers' it felt fiddly and clunky, bore no resemblance to FL Studio (obviously there was a reason for that), and was plagued with timing issues. So it sat on my tablet, unused, while Caustic got all the work.

While spring-cleaning my tablet the other day, I went to take one last look at it before uninstalling, just to be sure... and saw the version 3 update for the first time. And my goodness, what a difference! FLSM3 has the best workflow I've seen in a software studio - without any help or tutorials I'd put half a (polished) track together in just a couple of hours, and it's all uphill from here!

Interface: All vector, simple, minimal*. Playlist and piano-roll editing is very 'touchscreen friendly' with just the right balance of snapping and slip editing to keep note entry in check while on a bumpy bus ride. Clips in the playlist are easily copied/pasted/truncated to build up arrangements, while remaining individually editable. It's amazing what IL have been able to strip out of a DAW interface while leaving everything so usable - the mixer in particular is among the barest I've seen, with controls like EQ being consigned to optional channel effect modules rather than cluttering up precious screen real estate if they're not needed. Things like instrument and velocity controls are kept out of the way as pull-out panels.

Capability: Everything can be automated, basic editing functions are intuitive so both the piano roll and playlist are quick and flexible to work with, no timing or stability issues*. Supports MIDI and audio (haven't played with these yet). App is mirrored by a VST plugin, so projects can always be continued in a full-scale DAW - this is not necessarily just a 'scratchpad'.

Sound: Projects are likely to end up more sample-based than an equivalent in Caustic, so it's fortunate that sound banks are of consistently high quality. Effects are excellent*. Automation is implemented through event clips, which can be repurposed in the playlist to add sonic movement to arrangements. Rendered output is perfect as you'd expect. Overall a very 'clean' sound consistent with other IL products - which you can always dirty up...

* Limitations: Needs a CPU meter. There's a shortage of stereo movement effects - eg. delays don't have a ping-pong option, there's no channel width effect. I'd like to see numeric values on all instrument controls, as it's tricky to set near-zero values using a slider that completely disappears under your finger. And it needs support for more time signatures - why so many music apps launch without such a fundamental feature is beyond me.

Bottom line: Caustic is still cool, but FL really is the fastest way from my brain to my speakers now - well worth a (second?) look.

Read Review

Click here to read all 2 reviews

Comments & Discussion for Image Line FL Studio Mobile

Discussion
Discussion: Active

3 October 2012 at 12:17pm

YOu seriously need t make for android, Or at least like the galaxy S3 or something powerful all those lines,

MDMK
MDMK
4 October 2012 at 5:20pm

In the FL Studio Mobile HD current version you can add and remove bars in the middle of a song. Note lengths are also not restricted anymore. So some improvements have been done by Image Line. I find FL Studio Mobile to be my favorite sequencer in iPad. I also own NanoStudio, Beat Maker 2 and Music Studio. All of these have their strengths, but FL Studio Mobile is a good choice if you do modern electronic music and use it only to quickly sketch your ideas and then export the MIDI data to your computer to finish your songs. NanoStudio on the other hand has a decent VA synth and has better routing / chaining of effects and a decent mixer view. It can definitely be a better choice if you want to make a finished /polished song with your iPad. But if you're going to import the MIDI into your main DAW anyway, I can't really see any point spending time tweaking synth sounds with iPad.

Beat Maker 2 has better audio editing options and supports virtual midi. Music Studio is pretty much same as FL Studio Mobile. It has better acoustic instrument samples but lacks in modern synth, bass and drum samples. It also doesn't have drum sequencer but it has buttons/pads to trigger chords.

Gazzle
Gazzle
24 November 2012 at 9:49pm

Agreed. I have the other software you mention, although I do have a big passion for nano studio. FL mobile is great for creating and sketching new ideas.

Please log in to join the discussion