Login / Register 0 items | $0.00 New@
 Superwave Trance-Pro by SuperWave is a Virtual Instrument Audio Plugin. It functions as a VST Plugin.
Superwave Trance-Pro
Product Superwave Trance-Pro
Developer SuperWave
Price (MSRP)
Type / Tags Synth (Analogue / Subtractive)
Plug-in, App & Soundware Format(s)
Operating System Availability
Download Released
Downloads Released
Miscellaneous Information
Copy ProtectionNone

SuperWave Trance-Pro is designed to deliver the powerful, penetrating sounds favoured by trance musicians.

2 Oscillators, Single, Dual, 7 Oscillators Superwave Mode:

  • Waveforms: Saw, Sine, Triangle, Pulse, Ramp, White Noise, Pink Noise.
  • Controls for Portamento, Volume control, Fine/Detune, Pulse Width, Velocity sensitivity.

2 Resonant Filters (2 x 1): 12dB:

  • Filter Types: Low Pass, High Pass, Band Pass, Band Reject.
  • ADSRs with parameter locking facility.
  • 2 x Amplifiers with controls for Attack, Decay, Sustain, Release and Lock.

Modulation with multiple routing options:

  • 2 x LFOs with multiple routing options, Additional Beat Ratios over Superwave P8.
  • Sample and Hold.

Arpeggiator with control for Mode, Range, Beat, Midi Channel, Hold, Gate.


  • Mono Delay x 2 (1 Stereo pair).
  • Additional Beat Ratios over Superwave P8.

Other Features:

  • 8 note polyphonic operation.
  • Mono/Polyphonic control.
  • Presets, 64 Trance Leads, 64 Trance Arpeggios.
Made with SynthEdit
Latest User Reviews Average user rating of 3.50 from 2 reviews

Reviewed By fluffy_little_something
August 26, 2013

Yes, I know, this synth is ancient, like 10 years or so. And the company has a bad reputation because of some trouble years ago, lots of customers were pissed by abysmal service. Afaik that was the fault of a former employee that did not take his job seriously. The developer as such seems to be a friendly guy, who does answer inquiries, although he has switched to developing other things instead of music plugins. Occasionally there are maintenance updates for his old synths, though.

Anyway, regarding the synth as such, I have both the Trance Pro and the Professional as both were part of a bundle. Since they are virtually identical, what I write applies to both. The only differences are the GUI color, the factory presets (I hate Trance and similar genres, thus the presets on the Trance Pro are crappy in my view), and most importantly there is a slight sound difference because of the Gibbs effect used in the Professional. The Professional sounds a bit warmer in my view, fewer high frequencies... Some people have said they are the same in terms of sound as well and that offering those two versions is a rip-off. That is not the case, they do sound different, I have created the very same patch using absolutely identical settings on all parameters (easy because the marker on the knob turns yellow at every other scale line), there is a clear sound difference. Personally I prefer the Professional's somewhat more muted sound most of the time, only for brass and other metallic sounds do I use the Trance Pro. If you think you can simply turn down the cutoff frequency on the Trance Pro to achieve exactly the same sound, that does not work, it changes the whole sound.

Superwave has a supersaw reputation because of the oscillator setup. But frankly, I never use that irritating sound, I hardly ever detune the 7 waves per oscillator beyond, say, 10:30 or 01:30 max. Combined with equally slight detuning of the two oscillators as such, one can get pretty pleasant pads out of those synths. Sounds one does not expect from a SE synth, let alone an old one. If necessary, the typical thin SE sound can be achieved by switching the oscillators to single-wave mode. Dual-wave mode sounds a bit thicker, but the superwave mode really boosts the sound to a different quality level. Interestingly, it consumes very little CPU even with both oscillators running in superwave mode, which by the way works with all waveforms, not just saw. There is no unison mode or sub-oscillator, though. But with those 14 waves per voice you can get pretty fat sounds like Quincy Jones synth basses, string ensembles etc. For certain sounds such as guitars the single-wave mode works fine, of course. You would not want multiple waves there, not even two oscillators because of the phases. In this case - 1 single wave per voice - the synth can get a bit quiet, even when setting volume to max.

Speaking of phases, the synth is funny in that it needs to warm up almost like hardware :D When you open an instance, you have to play around for 15 seconds or so before the oscillator/wave phases have shifted enough to produce a good sound.

The whole osc-filter-amp-delay chain is dual, i.e. each osc has its own filter, amp, and envelopes, and you can pan them individually, allowing for a wide stereo sound. Often however you will use the same filter and amp settings for both oscillators, in which case you simply lock the second filter, amp, envelopes to the first ones. That is one advantage of the paid version over the free P8: the envelopes also have such lock switches. Thanks to the dual layout you can do nice sounds, like picking the same osc and filter settings, but unlocking the envelopes and thus creating multi-stage envelopes. Nice for brass ensembles etc.
By the way, another advantage of the paid versions is that you can set the velocity as you please, unlike with the P8, where it seems set to 100%, which can be irritating, especially for people who are not good keyboard players. But I guess it is meant to be irritating, else nobody would buy the paid versions. Nor does the P8 have pulse width knobs.

What I also like is that the filter envelopes are always retriggered, which unfortunately is rather rare. Very handy when playing pads with certain envelope configurations.

Regarding the cons, for such cheap synths there are few. One is the resolution of the LFO rate slider. Cycling through the LFO Beat options is also a pain in the ***. While there is a kind of modulation matrix, it unfortunately allows for only one single modulation, i.e. one can't set up several sources and destinations. The basic sound of the filters is not top-notch of course, no 0fd or anything fancy, but at least there is very little aliasing compared to other SE synths. Finally, it would be cool if one could load Professional patches into the Trance Pro and vice versa, after all, they use identical parameters. This way one could easily compare which of the two is better for any given patch.

All in all, I really like those synths, the Professional is my go-to synth until I get my hardware synth for Christmas. Since I make mostly old-skool 80s music (RnB, Fusion, Jazz), I am happy that I can get decent electric guitars (clean, not distorted) and basses, pads, brass etc. out of it. Of course the sound is not as good as with Diva and the like, but it is far better than with most SE synths, and that in a very CPU efficient way. A dozen instances and more are no problem even on my AMD computer :).

PS: Almost 1.5 years later, this synth still is one of my go-to synths. Since I am emulating real instruments a lot now, the two independent synth lines are really cool. I can build a sound like with building blocks. On this electric piano patch for instance I used one line for the click alone, and the other for the sound as such:


This is without any effects, when adding reverb or chorus, it sounds way better :)

Three things I would like to see improved, though:

- The filter should have 24db variants as well, especially lp of course. That would be really great.

- They should add a global static hp filter to get rid of low frequencies like on the Juno's.

- The envelopes are pretty snappy (different curve compared to the P8), but there is some strange behavior regarding certain combinations of kb follow and envelope amount. Seems the kb follow control determines whether or not the envelope can be set to a negative amount, which is unusual and probably not supposed to be that way. On the P8 the envelopes work as they should.

Read more

Reviewed By Timeflyer
October 29, 2004

I like to use this synth for arpeggiators or trance-mainsynths in my Fruity Loops 4.12 .

At first sight the Interface is a little bit confusing, but playing with all the knobs can be very useful to learn how this synth works and which potential it has.
For me the filter is not very good, but there are other cheaper Vst-Synths which sounds more worse or not so good.
The Presets (Arpeggiators and Tranceleads/ and very much) are all well and they sound very good for
a synth that has this little price.

If you want to buy this synth, buy the Superwave Bundle with the superwave p8, superwave pro and performer. I did it so.
With this vst-plugins you can easily create good-sounding Tranceloops and integrate these in your songs.
Not good: the Superwave Trance Pro uses a bit to much CPU !!! Don´t set this plug too much into your sequenzer/vst-host.
I didn´t use the customer service , but i will do in earlier future to get more informations about this plugin, so that I can create much more good sounds.

Try it yourselves !Read more


Discussion: Active
5 December 2016 at 10:39pm

A big difference between the paid versions and the free version is polyphony. The paid versions are 10 note polyphonic, the free version is just 8 note polyphonic. Makes the difference when playing chords.

The presets of the Pro are fantastic btw, you get 2 times more presets than the free version.

Please log in to join the discussion

Superwave Trance-Pro

Average user rating of 3.50 from 2 reviews

 My KVR - Version Control & Lists
Not In Your MY KVR Groups
(or group limitation prevents versioning)
48 people have added Superwave Trance-Pro to 9 My KVR groups 56 times
+4 in private groups

KVR Rank (Based on page views)

Overall: 3326  3168

30-Day: 2948; 7-Day: 5041; Yesterday: 2760

Studio Series - Recording Drums - Logic Pro X 503Keying Essentials - After Effects CC 105Auto-Tune EFX+ Video Manual - Auto-Tune 101Studio Series - Recording Vocals - Pro Tools 502The OP-Z Explored - Teenage Engineering 104