Cool. Looking forward to v1.0.rlahalla wrote:Yeah, that's one of the last things that will be added prior to the V1 release. We'll probably have a few options for thatIngonator wrote:Would it be possible to include a 16-bit export in the v1.0?
hehe, me tooIngonator wrote:Cool. Looking forward to v1.0.
These people probably have no idea the time and efforts require for coding these apps. I sincerely hope that this will not affect your sales and your morale. Bad news. This really SUCKS!!! Let that "traitor" go to hell..rlahalla wrote:Just got a message from a user who informed me that Wave Designer was cracked. Eh? Really? It has no copy protection. Odd. It's amusing how cracking teams take responsibility for software that they didn't create or even think of. Lame. Do something productive with that talent of reverse engineering, why don't you?
Note to hackers/crackers: You aren't very smart. Cracking software that has no copy protection is pretty lame. Why don't you say that you just got a free copy from a legit user and passed it out? I don't think these moron users would think any less, they're getting free software anyways.
Note to legit users: If you pass out Wave Designer any more, I'll stop working on it for good and then you can reverse engineer it yourself and work on adding features to it. I'm pretty damn trusting and generous with my time, since you know, I don't add copy protection to anything at all and I give out free shit all the time.
Nah, they do know, but they're lazy inconsiderate losers with no idea that the skills they have for reverse engineering products could be put to use in creating new products that would make them money and a decent living. As for the idiot who passed out the download - that person won't be able to purchase our products again.xx JPRacer xx wrote:
Eh, no way to capture his soul, else I would. For now, I'll just make his/her life miserable in other waysIngonator wrote:This really SUCKS!!! Let that "traitor" go to hell..
If it was just a regular crack on a project I put copy protection on, I wouldn't be so ticked. It's only because it was one of our customers who outed the project that I'm agitated.Shabdahbriah wrote:Wow... I'm really sorry to hear this, man.
These people are NOT "Robin Hood(s)", they're just "robbers".
really pisses me off.
Yes, some of these pirate groups have some really good coders and I'm sure they know about the effort programming require. I was talking about the asshole that leaked the product.rlahalla wrote:Nah, they do know, but they're lazy inconsiderate losers with no idea that the skills they have for reverse engineering products could be put to use in creating new products that would make them money and a decent living.xx JPRacer xx wrote:
I doubt it was difficult if it had no DRM.Tricky-Loops wrote:You can't stop little motherfuckers. You should care about the 95 percent of honestly buying (and paying) people. If you treat them good and offer good products, they will pay for it. There always will be warez gangstas in the world, no matter how difficult the copy protection is to crack. Those people make cracks because of their evil (gangsta) attitude - to show others their power -, not because they were so poor that they couldn't afford paying for products.
Difficulty isn't the main point: For a sexual criminal it isn't important if the woman is a professional muscle-equipped boxer (and difficult to kidnap) or just some cheap, weak house wife (and easy to kidnap). He only wants to show the superiority of his power. The same counts for warez crackers. They want to show their power. They would even crack freeware, if they can gain a feeling of superiority. I don't use warez, but I've studied the behavior of the crackers because I wanted to know what these people drives.camsr wrote:I doubt it was difficult if it had no DRM.Tricky-Loops wrote:You can't stop little motherfuckers. You should care about the 95 percent of honestly buying (and paying) people. If you treat them good and offer good products, they will pay for it. There always will be warez gangstas in the world, no matter how difficult the copy protection is to crack. Those people make cracks because of their evil (gangsta) attitude - to show others their power -, not because they were so poor that they couldn't afford paying for products.
Yeah, it wasn't an actual crack. It's just taking someone's hard work and passing it out for a little warez kiddie cred.camsr wrote:How can you call it a crack if there is no coding to do? It only needs to be redistributed. That's piracy.
we-can-build-a-city
bounce
natural-e-minorsecond-draft
i-gotta-smoke
rise-up
get-off-my-lawn© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
