KVR Audio

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:21 pm

i think this watermarking guff is a load of smoke and mirrors designed to scare....it doesnt exists

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:46 pm

flakes2 wrote: I just checked the profiles of some of the trolls. It seem to be always the same people who bash certain companies.

Yep, totally. Always the same agitators looking for a derail.

murnau · Post by **murnau** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:53 pm

to the asslickers here: i only bash two, the rest is great - no complaints.

xoxos · Post by **xoxos** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:57 pm

from real life: sometime in the 90's music store guy took me to his home studio to demo his unitor setup.

"all these boards are chipped so don't try to steal them."

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:00 pm

Numanoid wrote:
Has Tone2 ever nicked somebody by the watermark?

Maybe this album?:

This one maybe...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiFTXckh0zU

faun2500 · Post by **faun2500** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:07 pm

Kriminal wrote:i think this watermarking guff is a load of smoke and mirrors designed to scare....it doesnt exists

Agree. Its bollox. I understand the files but some kind of audio water mark from the oscillators of a softsynth?

On ya' bike!

Sendy · Post by **Sendy** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:09 pm

Kriminal wrote:i think this watermarking guff is a load of smoke and mirrors designed to scare....it doesnt exists

It certainly does exist in the land of music distribution, and people who listen to music with a wide dynamic range such as classical/orchestral music DO notice it and get very pissed off about it.

There is also the very real problem of the "slippery slope" and the sort of paranoia (and terrible sound quality) that could arise in the future where watermarking is everywhere in multiple layers and everybody is afraid to sample the slightest little sliver of sound

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:12 pm

Sendy wrote:
Kriminal wrote:i think this watermarking guff is a load of smoke and mirrors designed to scare....it doesnt exists
It certainly does exist in the land of music distribution, and people who listen to music with a wide dynamic range such as classical/orchestral music DO notice it and get very pissed off about it.

There is also the very real problem of the "slippery slope" and the sort of paranoia (and terrible sound quality) that could arise in the future where watermarking is everywhere in multiple layers and everybody is afraid to sample the slightest little sliver of sound

i was refering to VST synths, i should have made that clear...

Sendy · Post by **Sendy** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:17 pm

Kriminal wrote:
Sendy wrote:
Kriminal wrote:i think this watermarking guff is a load of smoke and mirrors designed to scare....it doesnt exists
It certainly does exist in the land of music distribution, and people who listen to music with a wide dynamic range such as classical/orchestral music DO notice it and get very pissed off about it.

There is also the very real problem of the "slippery slope" and the sort of paranoia (and terrible sound quality) that could arise in the future where watermarking is everywhere in multiple layers and everybody is afraid to sample the slightest little sliver of sound
i was refering to VST synths, i should have made that clear...

Oh right. I'm kinda with you on that one. I don't see how they can have any kind of workable system with it to be honest. But you never know

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:32 pm

Sendy wrote:
Kriminal wrote:
Sendy wrote:
Kriminal wrote:i think this watermarking guff is a load of smoke and mirrors designed to scare....it doesnt exists
It certainly does exist in the land of music distribution, and people who listen to music with a wide dynamic range such as classical/orchestral music DO notice it and get very pissed off about it.

There is also the very real problem of the "slippery slope" and the sort of paranoia (and terrible sound quality) that could arise in the future where watermarking is everywhere in multiple layers and everybody is afraid to sample the slightest little sliver of sound
i was refering to VST synths, i should have made that clear...
Oh right. I'm kinda with you on that one. I don't see how they can have any kind of workable system with it to be honest. But you never know

you two are clearly sock puppet pirates covering up for someone else who watermarks audio!
probably...
or something.

ENV1 · Post by **ENV1** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:34 pm

Oh, i just see we are already in the 'you are all pirates/trolls/thieves/shills/sockpuppets' stage.

Nice going. This means it cant be long now until we get to the 'hackers and crackers' bit...

Sendy · Post by **Sendy** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:41 pm

Don't diss my mad haxx0r skills. Some say... I'm an even 1337er hacker than Wheatley from Portal 2!

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:48 pm

ENV1 wrote:Oh, i just see we are already in the 'you are all pirates/trolls/thieves/shills/sockpuppets' stage.

Nice going. This means it cant be long now until we get to the 'hackers and crackers' bit...

hey, i was joking, although that has happened yes, my post was merely parody

i just wanted to be part of an already epic thread and otherwise have no interest either way.

ENV1 · Post by **ENV1** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:53 pm

vurt wrote:
ENV1 wrote:Oh, i just see we are already in the 'you are all pirates/trolls/thieves/shills/sockpuppets' stage.

Nice going. This means it cant be long now until we get to the 'hackers and crackers' bit...

hey, i was joking, although that has happened yes, my post was merely parody

i just wanted to be part of an already epic thread and otherwise have no interest either way.

Yes yes, i got it.

I wasnt responding to your post.

murnau · Post by **murnau** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:53 pm

those threads always add a few to my "muted" list.

Which plugins add unwanted watermarks to audio?