It got a pretty good review in CM/MusicRadar last year:Examigan wrote:I am not sure why I haven't heard much else about it.
http://www.mutools.com/mux-product.html
http://www.musicradar.com/reviews/tech/ ... mux-579122
It got a pretty good review in CM/MusicRadar last year:Examigan wrote:I am not sure why I haven't heard much else about it.
http://www.mutools.com/mux-product.html
Numanoid wrote:It got a pretty good review in CM/MusicRadar last year:Examigan wrote:I am not sure why I haven't heard much else about it.
http://www.mutools.com/mux-product.html
http://www.musicradar.com/reviews/tech/ ... mux-579122
After having "slaughtered" MuLab in the previous issue it was like CM got "cold feet" and embraced MUX even more that they maybe would have doneTricky-Loops wrote:Numanoid wrote:It got a pretty good review in CM/MusicRadar last year:Examigan wrote:I am not sure why I haven't heard much else about it.
http://www.mutools.com/mux-product.html
http://www.musicradar.com/reviews/tech/ ... mux-579122
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=385560
No, that is hardly an issueCompyfox wrote:MUX is highly underrated, maybe due to the fact that it's currently still "Win Only"
I agree. I'm sure all have seen that I'm on KVR all the time and I've never even heard of MUX before this thread and I love virtual modular stuff. Mulab needs to up their presence on the web a bit if someone like me who's always looking for cool stuff like this hasn't found it.ravasb wrote:I love MUX a lot, but I think part of the problem is that very few people really know about it as a product separate from Mulab. Mulab has a lot of good features, but it is not as fully developed as a number of other DAWs, at least not yet. If people have heard of MUX at all, they may think it too is not as full featured a synth. I think the best part of Mulab is that MUX is integrated into it.
I know the dev is a one man operation and must be incredibly busy, but I think it would help him to push MUX separately from Mulab.
I'm about to download the MUX demo right now, but just from reading the product description it's clear to me that MUX is more like Reaktor as it's a kind of modular authoring environment. KarmaFX's Modular is much more of a fixed Modular synth like VAZ Modular or Zebra.Numanoid wrote:What do you guys prefer if you had to choose between MUX or KarmaFX?
http://www.kvraudio.com/product/karmafx ... fx/details
Depends on your needs. With MUX you can build both effects and synths and can be build from a deeper level so its much more flexible, but for more straight forward modular synth patching, KarmaFX could be a more interesting for some. The visual feedback from the KarmaFX modules is also quite nice. Additive, FM and more filter types available are a plus for me.Numanoid wrote:What do you guys prefer if you had to choose between MUX or KarmaFX?
http://www.kvraudio.com/product/karmafx ... fx/details
Where's the review? I would be interested in reading it.Examigan wrote:Well I finished my review, and I really like it.
It just has so much included, especially for the price. Lot's of creative possibilities with this one.
It will be in the next issue of SoundBytesbharris22 wrote:Where's the review? I would be interested in reading it.Examigan wrote:Well I finished my review, and I really like it.
It just has so much included, especially for the price. Lot's of creative possibilities with this one.
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement