Repro-1 (out now)
-
- KVRAF
- 2504 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
At this stage, with complex modulations and/or high resonance, I'm finding I'm generally liking 1 the least.
Often there seems to be two groups which exhibit similar behaviour - 1 & 4 are one group (the less good, more stable/static, less complex) and 2, 3 & 5 (more chaotic and complex).
It would be nice to be able to switch between filters with the 1-5 number keys on the keyboard though...
Often there seems to be two groups which exhibit similar behaviour - 1 & 4 are one group (the less good, more stable/static, less complex) and 2, 3 & 5 (more chaotic and complex).
It would be nice to be able to switch between filters with the 1-5 number keys on the keyboard though...
-
- KVRian
- 522 posts since 11 Sep, 2004 from inne Büchs
So far i like 4 and 5 the most while 2 and 3 the least.
Tomorrow it might be the opposite though....
Thanks for this to U-he, its quite interesting to "test" ones own taste this way.
Tomorrow it might be the opposite though....
Thanks for this to U-he, its quite interesting to "test" ones own taste this way.
Andy is a support ninja.
-
- KVRist
- 91 posts since 11 Dec, 2013
1 is definitely the most different and loud, but has some odd sounds, when high level modulation.
1 and 4 have similar beating when low level modulation and hi resonance, also 2, 3, 5 respectively have similar beating among themselves.
5 is the most quiet.
which is the best. i have no idea. have to think about it.
1 and 4 have similar beating when low level modulation and hi resonance, also 2, 3, 5 respectively have similar beating among themselves.
5 is the most quiet.
which is the best. i have no idea. have to think about it.
-
- KVRer
- 3 posts since 20 Jul, 2015
Is it possible that people could see the results of the survey above and that could subconsciously influence their decision on which filter is best? Might be best if the results are hidden until you've cast your vote!
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28068 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Weird! It's our normal installer, not sure what to do... maybe the guys at support at u-he dot com know, but they're still dismantling our booth... maybe tomorrow then...lesha wrote:I can't install, even as Administrator. Win 8.1 x64
-
- KVRAF
- 2504 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
Seems you have similar impressions to my own...andresnol wrote:1 is definitely the most different and loud, but has some odd sounds, when high level modulation.
1 and 4 have similar beating when low level modulation and hi resonance, also 2, 3, 5 respectively have similar beating among themselves.
-
penguinfromdeep penguinfromdeep https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=193898
- KVRAF
- 1993 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
it's tough for me between 3 or 4 after some more playing around
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool
-
- KVRAF
- 1604 posts since 18 Feb, 2005 from Serbia
Sorry, it's ok now. I've disabled Auto-Sandbox in Comodo firewall and it works now.Urs wrote:Weird! It's our normal installer, not sure what to do... maybe the guys at support at u-he dot com know, but they're still dismantling our booth... maybe tomorrow then...lesha wrote:I can't install, even as Administrator. Win 8.1 x64
Strange, I haven't had any similar problems before...
It's easy if you know how
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
first impressions.
n.5 my fav. but most of them are too close to call.
the only filter that stands out as notably different is n.1 very piercing when self osc kicks in..but a filter like that is always useful for some punchy piercy sound. so I'd keep both n.5 and n.1 as they are 2 distinctly different flavours.
n.5 my fav. but most of them are too close to call.
the only filter that stands out as notably different is n.1 very piercing when self osc kicks in..but a filter like that is always useful for some punchy piercy sound. so I'd keep both n.5 and n.1 as they are 2 distinctly different flavours.
-
- KVRAF
- 1702 posts since 22 Apr, 2009 from Belgrade
Here's a quick demo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfoCs_zaX90
Filter 1 sounds the most lo-fi to me, but I'd love to have it as an option in the final product. Others are close, leaning towards 4 or 5 but can't decide yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfoCs_zaX90
Filter 1 sounds the most lo-fi to me, but I'd love to have it as an option in the final product. Others are close, leaning towards 4 or 5 but can't decide yet.
Bedroom Producers Blog << Free VST Plugins!
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034 - KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
Switch vca source to envelope - it can at least share the filter envelope. You can get interesting modulation if you experiment with the envelope attack and decay with short note runs.Opax wrote:I'm loving the sound of this. It's just a shame there are no amplifier envelope, LFO and modulation sections.
That GUI is beautiful.
-
- KVRist
- 91 posts since 11 Dec, 2013
: D cool!beely wrote:andresnol wrote: Seems you have similar impressions to my own...
also prob in that group of 2,3, 5 number 3 sounds different from 2 and 5 again respectively (ie. nr 3 starts already buzzing when cutoff at 7,5 while 2 and 5 don't do that.)
