Reaktor Blocks vs. Softube Modular
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1288 posts since 25 Jul, 2009
What's the verdict?
There are long threads about each of them, but I'm wondering what people who have both of them think.
I've got Reaktor, but not Softube.
There are long threads about each of them, but I'm wondering what people who have both of them think.
I've got Reaktor, but not Softube.
Last edited by felis on Sun Feb 05, 2017 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Right now, Reaktor is more complete, especially with the new blocks. Softube has very few modules. Sound wise, I like Softube just as much and when it finally expands its module line (which looks like it may be a while) I think it will be just as good if not better than Reaktor. But right now, if you're looking at completeness, Reaktor 6 is the way to go hands down.
- KVRAF
- 35297 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Reaktor 6 also works properly in all hosts
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Yeah, that's another thing. Loading 3rd party sets in some hosts is impossible because of no internal browser.aMUSEd wrote:Reaktor 6 also works properly in all hosts
-
- KVRist
- 397 posts since 3 Feb, 2017
I think the Softube Modular with the Intellijel modules sounds much better than Reaktor , but I guess it depends a lot on the kind of music you make too ? Also the patching feels more intuitive to me than the blocks.
Hopefully there will be new modules soon.
Hopefully there will be new modules soon.
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 16369 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
The Softube will likely give you the more traditional modular feeling, but Reaktor is so much more than the Softube modular could ever be that I'm not even sure they are worth comparing
- KVRAF
- 11093 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
^THIS^ - It's like comparing a corvette with a carrier. Actually, you can look at Reaktor as an entire fleet.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:The Softube will likely give you the more traditional modular feeling, but Reaktor is so much more than the Softube modular could ever be that I'm not even sure they are worth comparing
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRist
- 353 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from Melbourne Australia
Yep even just the bits of Reaktor that deal with making GUI bits are probably as complicated as Softube modular.
Joking, but not really.
Joking, but not really.
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Ultimately, once there are a sufficient number of modules, Softube Modular will be like putting together a Eurorack system.
Reaktor is just on a whole different level and, for most normal people, overkill as far as the development end. I for one have long given up trying to build the be all and end all ensemble using Core because it's way over my head, not to mention an ugly as sin interface, whereas Softube is, if nothing else, manageable on a less than "I need a degree in physics" level.
TLDR - I'm too stupid to use Reaktor but not so stupid that I can't use Softube.
Reaktor is just on a whole different level and, for most normal people, overkill as far as the development end. I for one have long given up trying to build the be all and end all ensemble using Core because it's way over my head, not to mention an ugly as sin interface, whereas Softube is, if nothing else, manageable on a less than "I need a degree in physics" level.
TLDR - I'm too stupid to use Reaktor but not so stupid that I can't use Softube.
-
- KVRist
- 353 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from Melbourne Australia
I wonder though, (and I know I'm not alone here) how many new modules we will end up seeing for SM.wagtunes wrote:Ultimately, once there are a sufficient number of modules, Softube Modular will be like putting together a Eurorack system.
I have a modular at home, but I almost bought softube just for the ufold alone.... As I've wanted something like that in software for years!
Ultimately though I still have my doubts about the success of this product, and thus its longevity and attractiveness to 3rd party developers. I would love to be proved wrong about this though.
Has there been a hint of any new stuff ?
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 16369 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
But you needn't get involved with any building at all. Even at the simplest level of loading an ensemble, Reaktor offers so much more than Softube will ever be able to match.Terrafractyl wrote:Yep even just the bits of Reaktor that deal with making GUI bits are probably as complicated as Softube modular.
Joking, but not really.
Of course, the op might only be interested in emulating current hardware modular trends.
-
- KVRist
- 353 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from Melbourne Australia
I wasn't suggesting he build anything at all! just sayin' its apples and oranges. We are in agreement about this!el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:But you needn't get involved with any building at all. Even at the simplest level of loading an ensemble, Reaktor offers so much more than Softube will ever be able to match.Terrafractyl wrote:Yep even just the bits of Reaktor that deal with making GUI bits are probably as complicated as Softube modular.
Joking, but not really.
Of course, the op might only be interested in emulating current hardware modular trends.
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Let me put it to you this way. Softube Modular is my 4th best selling library just passing Zebra 2 today.Terrafractyl wrote:I wonder though, (and I know I'm not alone here) how many new modules we will end up seeing for SM.wagtunes wrote:Ultimately, once there are a sufficient number of modules, Softube Modular will be like putting together a Eurorack system.
I have a modular at home, but I almost bought softube just for the ufold alone.... As I've wanted something like that in software for years!
Ultimately though I still have my doubts about the success of this product, and thus its longevity and attractiveness to 3rd party developers. I would love to be proved wrong about this though.
Has there been a hint of any new stuff ?
And honestly, I'm stunned. But apparently, this is a very popular soft synth.
Naturally, I can't predict the future, but if my sales are any indication, I think Softube Modular is going to be around for a very long time.
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 16369 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
I understood your the intention of your original comment, but if taken out of context it might seem to support others' contentions, here, that Reaktor is complicated. All I'm trying to do is balance that notion with a positive experience within the Reaktor universe from someone who has zero interest in building.Terrafractyl wrote:I wasn't suggesting he build anything at all! just sayin' its apples and oranges. We are in agreement about this!el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:But you needn't get involved with any building at all. Even at the simplest level of loading an ensemble, Reaktor offers so much more than Softube will ever be able to match.Terrafractyl wrote:Yep even just the bits of Reaktor that deal with making GUI bits are probably as complicated as Softube modular.
Joking, but not really.
Of course, the op might only be interested in emulating current hardware modular trends.
But, yes, we do agree
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Reaktor can be very simple (insert block A into block B) It can also be extremely complex if you want it to. For those with the intelligence to handle that (not me) that's great. But that part of Reaktor isn't for everybody. And thus, what you're paying for in theory, you're not getting everything that you can out of it if you only use it at the surface level.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:I understood your the intention of your original comment, but if taken out of context it might seem to support others' contentions, here, that Reaktor is complicated. All I'm trying to do is balance that notion with a positive experience within the Reaktor universe from someone who has zero interest in building.Terrafractyl wrote:I wasn't suggesting he build anything at all! just sayin' its apples and oranges. We are in agreement about this!el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:But you needn't get involved with any building at all. Even at the simplest level of loading an ensemble, Reaktor offers so much more than Softube will ever be able to match.Terrafractyl wrote:Yep even just the bits of Reaktor that deal with making GUI bits are probably as complicated as Softube modular.
Joking, but not really.
Of course, the op might only be interested in emulating current hardware modular trends.
But, yes, we do agree