I really don't know what is the reason, but I have downloaded the demo of both SEM and Jupiter. I had the same results, so it is not because of Lab 3, but the original plugins are using too much CPU in my system. They use more than Korg ARP Odyssey preset ( which is 16 voices x 16 unison) !!!Ah_Dziz wrote:You can move the vst3 files and then the vst 2 versions will show up. Just plop em over into a temporary folder to get them out of the way. Then you can check out if the vst2 versions have a noticeable change in performance.EnGee wrote:I recently upgraded from Arturia Lab lite to the full version (just $29 for 6000+ presets!).
Anyway, the Jupiter and SEM presets are maxing my CPU in both Cubase and Reaper! In Cubase i see the VST3 version only.
Has anyone encountered the same? I thought to ask before contacting support.
Arturia V Collection 6
-
- KVRAF
- 8802 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 2946 posts since 31 Jan, 2003 from Ghent, Belgium
Do you have these performance issues with plugins from other manufacturers? If not, it might be some kind of Ryzen/Arturia issue...EnGee wrote:OK! My PC is:T-CM11 wrote: Maybe you should mention what kind of CPU you have, and audio interface (drivers)? On a second generation i5 laptop, Jupiter is light on CPU / SEM relatively heavy when using all voices - but certainly not maxing out.
If 2 plugins (e.g. VST2 & 3 version of the same plugin) have the same VST id, Cubase will only show one of them.
https://www.soundonsound.com/sound-advi ... -conflicts
Win 10 64bit with Ryzen 1600X / 16GB RAM / GTX 1060 and iTwo presonus interface (ASIO with 44.1 khz and 256 buffer). Both Cubase 9 and Reaper 5 are 64bit. I had SEM V before (both the old version and the new and I didn't have any problem with it with my previous system which was i5-4570 and 8GB).
However, I'm talking about "Arturia Lab 3" SEM V and Jupiter V presets not the individual plugins of SEM V and Jupiter V! But to check out the individual plugins, I will download the demos and see!
Because theoretically, your 1600X should be more than capable to run any plugin with ease.
-
- KVRAF
- 8802 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
No I don't have. Do you mean you can play those mentioned presets with ease? Anyway, I don't have a problem with the other presets from other synths.T-CM11 wrote: Do you have these performance issues with plugins from other manufacturers? If not, it might be some kind of Ryzen/Arturia issue...
Because theoretically, your 1600X should be more than capable to run any plugin with ease.
Oh, I just wanted to try again, but SEM and Jupiter presets have disappeared from Analog LAB after I uninstalled their demos!! Ok, I think the problem is solved then
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 2946 posts since 31 Jan, 2003 from Ghent, Belgium
They read your problem here and solved it!EnGee wrote: Oh, I just wanted to try again, but SEM and Jupiter presets have disappeared from Analog LAB after I uninstalled their demos!! Ok, I think the problem is solved then
-
- KVRAF
- 8802 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
The best solution
Anyway, I think I will buy DX7 V in the next discount. I really like it especially when I set the velocity to full instead of DX7. It's my next purchase, unless Steinberg/Yamaha surprises us
Anyway, I think I will buy DX7 V in the next discount. I really like it especially when I set the velocity to full instead of DX7. It's my next purchase, unless Steinberg/Yamaha surprises us
-
- KVRAF
- 2641 posts since 23 Jun, 2006 from Hungary
Also demoed dx7/ nice sounds, but 1 thing annoyed me : found one preset where cpu went crazy and remained at high level even if I didn!t play any notes.
On the other hand, I also have FM8 and it delivers same quality sounds with less cpu.
So soon I will uninstall arturia demo.
On the other hand, I also have FM8 and it delivers same quality sounds with less cpu.
So soon I will uninstall arturia demo.
Youtube channel: https://youtube.com/@SoftSynthPortal
-
- KVRAF
- 8802 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
I haven't experienced problems with the demo (dx7), but I also haven't spent a lot of time with it. I almost bought it 2nd hand, but then I decided to wait. Anyway, I have most (if not all!) its presets in Analog Lab, but of course with very limited parameters to play with.
Still I think Synclavier V is the best synth in the collection regarding CPU usage, sound and stability. I had much less problems with it than other Arturia synths.
Still I think Synclavier V is the best synth in the collection regarding CPU usage, sound and stability. I had much less problems with it than other Arturia synths.
-
Sound Mechanics Sound Mechanics https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=54454
- KVRAF
- 1618 posts since 10 Jan, 2005 from UK
EnGee wrote:I haven't experienced problems with the demo (dx7), but I also haven't spent a lot of time with it. I almost bought it 2nd hand, but then I decided to wait. Anyway, I have most (if not all!) its presets in Analog Lab, but of course with very limited parameters to play with.
Still I think Synclavier V is the best synth in the collection regarding CPU usage, sound and stability. I had much less problems with it than other Arturia synths.
I must agree that the Synclavier V is the one that I tend to gravitate towards. It's an extremely interesting synth to program and has an excellent sound plus with the original code used I feel that I'm hearing the real deal!
-
- KVRAF
- 8802 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
Yes it is a great synth. I was avoiding it because programming/understanding it is not so easy, but recently I begin to enjoy it more as I found video tutorials by Arturia and they are extremely useful! There are 3 parts I think, here is the first one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYO55G959uc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYO55G959uc
- KVRAF
- 11093 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Both are excellent synths, and both do a great job with FM synthesis. But they are different, and one does not replace the other, IMO (except for plain vanilla DX7 sounds).dune_rave wrote:Also demoed dx7/ nice sounds, but 1 thing annoyed me : found one preset where cpu went crazy and remained at high level even if I didn!t play any notes.
On the other hand, I also have FM8 and it delivers same quality sounds with less cpu.
So soon I will uninstall arturia demo.
But in that chapter, I think the DX7 V wins. IMO, it translates better the original DX7 family SYX files.
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRer
- 26 posts since 26 Jun, 2011
Totally Agree. DX7 V is a superb emulation. For me, just alone itself deserve the cost of updatingfmr wrote:Both are excellent synths, and both do a great job with FM synthesis. But they are different, and one does not replace the other, IMO (except for plain vanilla DX7 sounds).dune_rave wrote:Also demoed dx7/ nice sounds, but 1 thing annoyed me : found one preset where cpu went crazy and remained at high level even if I didn!t play any notes.
On the other hand, I also have FM8 and it delivers same quality sounds with less cpu.
So soon I will uninstall arturia demo.
But in that chapter, I think the DX7 V wins. IMO, it translates better the original DX7 family SYX files.
-
- KVRian
- 912 posts since 18 Feb, 2004
Love the Flying North by Dolby intro in that video
-
- KVRian
- 1288 posts since 25 Jul, 2009
I'm a bit disappointed that Arturia hasn't implemented release velocity in more of their plugins.
Obviously, they know how to do it, because it works like a champ in the Matrix 12V.
Come one Arturia - hear my plea.
I got Steinberg's Absolute 3 recently and am very pleased that release velocity can be used pretty much anywhere and everywhere.
With one change to Arturia's stuff, I wouldn't have need for too much else.
Obviously, they know how to do it, because it works like a champ in the Matrix 12V.
Come one Arturia - hear my plea.
I got Steinberg's Absolute 3 recently and am very pleased that release velocity can be used pretty much anywhere and everywhere.
With one change to Arturia's stuff, I wouldn't have need for too much else.
Last edited by felis on Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 3368 posts since 2 Oct, 2004
I recently watched a video on YouTube. On some patches FM8 was closer to the DX7. On others it was either Dexed or DX7 V. I don’t think any captures the original 100% but FM8 is mellower than DX7 V and just has a good sound character of its own.modularg2 wrote:Totally Agree. DX7 V is a superb emulation. For me, just alone itself deserve the cost of updatingfmr wrote:Both are excellent synths, and both do a great job with FM synthesis. But they are different, and one does not replace the other, IMO (except for plain vanilla DX7 sounds).dune_rave wrote:Also demoed dx7/ nice sounds, but 1 thing annoyed me : found one preset where cpu went crazy and remained at high level even if I didn!t play any notes.
On the other hand, I also have FM8 and it delivers same quality sounds with less cpu.
So soon I will uninstall arturia demo.
But in that chapter, I think the DX7 V wins. IMO, it translates better the original DX7 family SYX files.
I dunno if this was shared yet on this thread:
https://youtu.be/HXkbgrHFehI
Orion Platinum, Muzys 2