I forgot how, but I've been there already, I have no thumbnail functionality. Might as well check how to turn it back on, as it didn't help. What's really irritating, is that you can't see folders, until everything loads, same pain in W10. Seriously, file explorer worked better in W3.1.camsr wrote:Try disabling thumbnail preview then, forgot how but it's possible.
Windows Vista support ends April 11
- KVRAF
- 4656 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
- KVRAF
- 4656 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
I started digging for a solution again and I found it. It is the stupid "optimize folder" feature after all, but the fast setting is not "general items" but "documents". Setting it globally requires registry edit, some guy made a useful batch script for it. Now I can browse large sample folders without switching to gangsta rap language mode.
- KVRAF
- 9577 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Someone actually considers installing Vista.......must have been born yesterday.......Under a rock...........Secluded from civilisation
Amazon: why not use an alternative
- KVRAF
- 4656 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
Yes, but in the long run, it's just faster to use explorer, especially that it's integrated - consider opening files from withing programs. The "documents" hack, does it for me. Now, if I could figure out how to fix Photoshop CS2...
-
- KVRAF
- 4007 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
XubuntuNumanoid wrote:This is like a notpad computer that I use for surfing, email and stuff.Zombie Queen wrote:What do you need support for?
When youtube stopped working, I got tired of WinXP I mean, for everyday use.
I still got WinXP on a couple of desktop computers.
But when surfing, checking email, internet banking, youtube, WinXP aint no good anymore.
I make music: progressive-acoustic | electronica/game-soundtrack work | progressive alt-metal
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
-
- KVRAF
- 1869 posts since 15 Sep, 2003 from Land of Crazies, USA
Nonsense. Lock your computer down with 7. I haven't upgraded anything on my music computer for about 2 years now, and I can do everything I need to. We're at an era where a properly built system will work for a nice long time. If something requires 10, I won't be buying it.zxant wrote:
When Win7 dies it's Linux time ...
Linux will *never* have the number of choices for music software that Windows/Mac has.
(My office computer is using a 6+ year old Intel chip, runs 7 just fine. I replaced the motherboard and RAM a while back just because I could. The old board maxed out at 4GB of RAM, the replacement one has 8GB. )
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
-
- KVRAF
- 4007 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
With SP2, Vista is generally faster than Win7 in my experience - once UAC and other annoyances are negated, and once you ignore shutdown and startup speed.chk071 wrote:No, it's about the same in terms of performance. But you could update Win 7 to Win 10, and get a lot of lifecycle, plus a better performance than both. Probably also better suited for small display devices like the HP Mini. Check for hardware compatibility then though, but the updater icon should show you if there's problems anyway.
I read a benchmark report several years ago where they stripped Vista, Win7 and XP back to core components (via Vlite, Nlite) and Vista always came out on top.
Last edited by metamorphosis on Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I make music: progressive-acoustic | electronica/game-soundtrack work | progressive alt-metal
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
-
- KVRAF
- 35436 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Yeah, doesn't surprise. I never understood why it got such a beating, in any regard.metamorphosis wrote:With SP2, Vista is generally faster than Win7 in my experience. I remember reading a benchmark report where they stripped Vista, Win7 and XP back to core components (via Vlite, Nlite) and Vista always came out on top.chk071 wrote:No, it's about the same in terms of performance. But you could update Win 7 to Win 10, and get a lot of lifecycle, plus a better performance than both. Probably also better suited for small display devices like the HP Mini. Check for hardware compatibility then though, but the updater icon should show you if there's problems anyway.
-
- KVRAF
- 4007 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
Largely because when it first came out, it really was crap, and there were lots of drive and non-driver bugs. Also it's UAC was super-annoying and pointless. By the time of SP2, and with UAC turned off, it got pretty reasonable.chk071 wrote: Yeah, doesn't surprise. I never understood why it got such a beating, in any regard.
I make music: progressive-acoustic | electronica/game-soundtrack work | progressive alt-metal
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers