I loaded a loop, cranked the threshold up, clicked Slice then reduced the Threshold.
As you can see, some transients are missed, some are early (5th and 6th slide) and some non-transients are sliced.
Q: Slicing ?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
What can I do to get the auto-slicing to be better?
I loaded a loop, cranked the threshold up, clicked Slice then reduced the Threshold.
As you can see, some transients are missed, some are early (5th and 6th slide) and some non-transients are sliced.
I loaded a loop, cranked the threshold up, clicked Slice then reduced the Threshold.
As you can see, some transients are missed, some are early (5th and 6th slide) and some non-transients are sliced.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
Also, adding a slice point (Alt+ double-click) is not the most intuitive key combo. Can this be made easier?
Alt+click, perhaps or on the right-click menu?
-----------------------------
Tip:
If you want to move a slice point earlier, select the slice to the right-hand side. Dragging the slice point marker to the left shortens the end point of the previous slice too.
Similarly, if you want to move a slice point later, select the slice to the left-hand side. Dragging the slice point marker to the right moves the start point of the next slice too.
Alt+click, perhaps or on the right-click menu?
-----------------------------
Tip:
If you want to move a slice point earlier, select the slice to the right-hand side. Dragging the slice point marker to the left shortens the end point of the previous slice too.
Similarly, if you want to move a slice point later, select the slice to the left-hand side. Dragging the slice point marker to the right moves the start point of the next slice too.
-
- KVRAF
- 2400 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
Transient detection is tricky. And to be truthful, I'm mostly "standing on the shoulders of giants" as they say in this regard (i.e. trying to implement research papers! 
The problem you are seeing is probably due to the fact that stuff that looks insignificant in volume can represent a rather big energy change once we are in fft mode. It is hard to find the best balance between precise results and reasonable computation time.
As usual, if you have a wave that behaves extra badly, send it to me and I can at least try to figure out why.
Cheers
/C
The problem you are seeing is probably due to the fact that stuff that looks insignificant in volume can represent a rather big energy change once we are in fft mode. It is hard to find the best balance between precise results and reasonable computation time.
As usual, if you have a wave that behaves extra badly, send it to me and I can at least try to figure out why.
Cheers
/C
TX16Wx Software Sampler:
http://www.tx16wx.com/
http://www.tx16wx.com/
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
