What if you delete Satin.log from your desktop? (not before making sure that Bug Friday ain't happening to you, of course)Tp3 wrote:I'm drooling over those numbers. my computer is not THAT inferior (9550) and according to DAWbench should be 25% slower which should - theoretically - give me at least 15 instances to play with.Compyfox wrote:I did have some findings however.
Tested on an i7 920, Win 7 Pro/Ultimate x64, RME HDSPe (currently on v3.38 with 256 samples as buffer), 6GB RAM, Cubase 6.5 x64, Cubase 7.06 (32bit), Cubase 7.06 x64. Test file was in 44/24, VST2 instances were used.
Creating a batch of 20 WAV channels with noise initially resulted in a "no processing" behavior until I saved and restarted.
I'd wish... with Rev 2107 I was able to reach 7 and the machine would freeze and halt (CPU consumption buildup
seem better. but overall its still not good).
Any new over that end ?
Bug Friday - win & suffer with u-he!
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28065 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRian
- 814 posts since 26 May, 2013 from France, Sisteron
I was thinking that your bug may be related to this one: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=396288
If I remember well, I tried with synth1 and other synths and the first not played *only with u-he synths*. I thought that it was an initialization issue in your synth engine. Have you looked at it?
If I remember well, I tried with synth1 and other synths and the first not played *only with u-he synths*. I thought that it was an initialization issue in your synth engine. Have you looked at it?
- KVRAF
- 2138 posts since 8 Feb, 2007
Did that.Urs wrote:What if you delete Satin.log from your desktop? (not before making sure that Bug Friday ain't happening to you, of course)Tp3 wrote:I'm drooling over those numbers. my computer is not THAT inferior (9550) and according to DAWbench should be 25% slower which should - theoretically - give me at least 15 instances to play with.Compyfox wrote:I did have some findings however.
Tested on an i7 920, Win 7 Pro/Ultimate x64, RME HDSPe (currently on v3.38 with 256 samples as buffer), 6GB RAM, Cubase 6.5 x64, Cubase 7.06 (32bit), Cubase 7.06 x64. Test file was in 44/24, VST2 instances were used.
Creating a batch of 20 WAV channels with noise initially resulted in a "no processing" behavior until I saved and restarted.
I'd wish... with Rev 2107 I was able to reach 7 and the machine would freeze and halt (CPU consumption buildup
seem better. but overall its still not good).
Any new over that end ?
And checked. no friday.
- KVRAF
- 6095 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Hate to throw a curve, but I can't get the VST3 version to even load in C7.5 ... It shows in the insert slot, but never enables. 2.4 version loads fine.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 6325 posts since 18 Jul, 2008 from New York
Once again no bugs. Let's add up our hours and send Urs a bill for our testing time.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28065 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yeah, hmmm…
I'm officially puzzled.
We'll be looking into this whole thing from a fresh perspective next week.
I wish to thank everyone for taking part in this challenge.
Allthough I'm sad we haven't got a winner (I truely am, in multiple ways), I want you to know that the time & effort wasn't wasted. We did find a couple of bugs by your feedback, albeit not the muting ones.
I hope we can do this again if we run into a similar issue…
Thanks,
- Urs
I'm officially puzzled.
We'll be looking into this whole thing from a fresh perspective next week.
I wish to thank everyone for taking part in this challenge.
Allthough I'm sad we haven't got a winner (I truely am, in multiple ways), I want you to know that the time & effort wasn't wasted. We did find a couple of bugs by your feedback, albeit not the muting ones.
I hope we can do this again if we run into a similar issue…
Thanks,
- Urs
- KVRAF
- 2138 posts since 8 Feb, 2007
Urs, I just wanted to be sure that I'm not complaining about something that I shouldn't :Urs wrote: We did find a couple of bugs by your feedback, albeit not the muting ones.
Does the CPU usage should be like that (is it OK) ? because you haven't mentioned it AT ALL (not that I've seen at least - not on your latest posts, anyway). I am NOT getting muted tracks (got it maybe once or twice) but the plug seem to impose EXTREMELY heady load on my machine, when I start to instasiate. is that the amount of plugin count that I should expect on my 9550 machine (6 or 7 instances) ?
I'll a little puzzled by that...
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28065 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Tp3, the issue of excessive CPU load on some systems is most likely something different from the bug we started this thread about.
We need to look into that issue too. Maybe it's all related - who is to say…?
We need to look into that issue too. Maybe it's all related - who is to say…?
- KVRAF
- 2138 posts since 8 Feb, 2007
Hey... just sayin'Urs wrote:Tp3, the issue of excessive CPU load on some systems is most likely something different from the bug we started this thread about.
We need to look into that issue too. Maybe it's all related - who is to say…?
I needed to know because it drives me crazy...
As I already told someone else : I have faith in you guys