Perhaps you have a point. In this case it's simply that, for free, the comps and the pitchshifter are very good indeed.Mushy Mushy wrote:I have to say I dont understand the need for channel strips in the ITB world.
Just add various EQ's, compressors, et al, in the chain and make your own.
I get it's more convenient, but it's literally only a couple of mouse clicks.
Perhaps I'm missing something though
Eventide UltraChannel Native plug-in for Free
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
- Beware the Quoth
- 33177 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
observation of prior history says not.Shabdahbriah wrote:I think it was meant as a compliment
well, true, dat. luminous as an x-ray technician, i am., albeit, falling far short of encompassing your luminous character.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
-
- KVRAF
- 11052 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Seattle
1) That's a legitimate concern.do_androids_dream wrote:1) I guess my concerns might actually be more with the ilok side of things rather than the channel strip.whyterabbyt wrote:Its a zero-cost marketing thing, like many other such things in the plugin industry. Its a familiar enough tactic that I wouldnt have expected it to engender the kind of paranoia it has, but then again this is the interwebz.
If you genuinely think there's a risk, then pass on it until you're sure. I think you're being misled by the 'its a trap' paranoia.
2) Perhaps I should just get on with it and deal with any problems if they arise
2) That would be how it is dealt with.
I'm not a musician, but I've designed sounds that others use to make music. http://soundcloud.com/obsidiananvil
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
If I were them I'd split all the modules off and sell them for $50 each.do_androids_dream wrote: Perhaps you have a point. In this case it's simply that, for free, the comps and the pitchshifter are very good indeed.
Surely that would get a better response than a $250 version of something the vast majority of people already have.
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
Yes, just considering whether or not to put myself in the position of having to deal with any problems should they arise... over thinking much?Shabdahbriah wrote:1) That's a legitimate concern.do_androids_dream wrote:1) I guess my concerns might actually be more with the ilok side of things rather than the channel strip.whyterabbyt wrote:Its a zero-cost marketing thing, like many other such things in the plugin industry. Its a familiar enough tactic that I wouldnt have expected it to engender the kind of paranoia it has, but then again this is the interwebz.
If you genuinely think there's a risk, then pass on it until you're sure. I think you're being misled by the 'its a trap' paranoia.
2) Perhaps I should just get on with it and deal with any problems if they arise
2) That would be how it is dealt with.
-
- KVRAF
- 11052 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Seattle
Sorry, I wasn't up on the "history".whyterabbyt wrote:observation of prior history says not.Shabdahbriah wrote:I think it was meant as a compliment
Some things are 'self-evident', though {admittedly} that may be apparent to me, only because I stand way too close to my microwave.whyterabbyt wrote:well, true, dat. luminous as an x-ray technician, i am., albeit, falling far short of encompassing your luminous character.
I'm not a musician, but I've designed sounds that others use to make music. http://soundcloud.com/obsidiananvil
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 9685 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
Mushy Mushy wrote:If I were them I'd split all the modules off and sell them for $50 each.do_androids_dream wrote: Perhaps you have a point. In this case it's simply that, for free, the comps and the pitchshifter are very good indeed.
Surely that would get a better response than a $250 version of something the vast majority of people already have.
It doesn't seem you're part of the market they're looking to interest. Can always just turn off the modules you don't want to use though.
That said, they sell the O-Pressor standalone as the 'Omnipressor' for 99 dollars. And the Pitch shift and delay are from the H3000 factory plugin.
I think they sound better than much of my 3rd party plugins and this is definitely a nice utility knife plugin for someone who doesn't have many options.
- Beware the Quoth
- 33177 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Neither was I till last week, but supposedly there was one, and it was the primary motive in my response. Which was a bit of a surprise to me, I have to say.Shabdahbriah wrote:Sorry, I wasn't up on the "history".whyterabbyt wrote:observation of prior history says not.Shabdahbriah wrote:I think it was meant as a compliment
Oh well, never mind.
Anyway; channel strips - sometimes all someone would want, sometimes not as flexible as dedicated separate plugins. Mileages vary and the length of a bit of string is not adequately predictable in advance.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
- KVRAF
- 5805 posts since 8 May, 2008 from ssssskipping ......... I left you there
No, it still works right. Some developers only admit lLok2 for their products, but this is not the case.Shabdahbriah wrote:Quick question regarding Ilok site registration.
I have an old ilok key (the transparent 'blue' one) with a couple of Motu instruments on it, which are currently NOT installed on any machine. Is it true that the ilok "registration" no longer supports that key?
thanks.
"A pig that doesn't fly is just a pig."
- Beware the Quoth
- 33177 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Yup, what standalone says. I have three old V1 iLoks and they all work.standalone wrote:No, it still works right. Some developers only admit lLok2 for their products, but this is not the case.Shabdahbriah wrote:Quick question regarding Ilok site registration.
I have an old ilok key (the transparent 'blue' one) with a couple of Motu instruments on it, which are currently NOT installed on any machine. Is it true that the ilok "registration" no longer supports that key?
thanks.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
-
- KVRAF
- 11052 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Seattle
Cool, thank you both!whyterabbyt wrote:Yup, what standalone says. I have three old V1 iLoks and they all work.standalone wrote:No, it still works right. Some developers only admit lLok2 for their products, but this is not the case.Shabdahbriah wrote:Quick question regarding Ilok site registration.
I have an old ilok key (the transparent 'blue' one) with a couple of Motu instruments on it, which are currently NOT installed on any machine. Is it true that the ilok "registration" no longer supports that key?
thanks.
I'm not a musician, but I've designed sounds that others use to make music. http://soundcloud.com/obsidiananvil
-
- KVRAF
- 2626 posts since 8 Sep, 2009
The "few mouse clicks" can become quite disturbing esp. when you hook an EQ between two comps. Depending on what you're trying to achieve it's an orgy of clicks.do_androids_dream wrote:Perhaps you have a point. In this case it's simply that, for free, the comps and the pitchshifter are very good indeed.
2nd use (at least to me) is final sound design with a strip hooked after e.g. a synth or in a drum bus. Here you either don't want to much clicking forward and back imho while the capabilities of a (this) strip are good enough for replacing or providing tools that are not present in the soundsource.
-
- KVRian
- 605 posts since 31 Aug, 2012
Love it always liked Eventide sound !Thanks for the code !
-
- KVRAF
- 6254 posts since 25 Mar, 2004
So, everyone's had some time to check this out a bit, and no one sees any "cutdown" or crippled signs in the software?
Like everyone else, I've been trying to figure out the marketing angle. I think the best suggestion so far is the building of an email database which can be very valuable.
On the other hand, NI's Supercharger plug was a freebie last year, and very complete (not crippled). But when the plug was released shortly after, a few nice features were added, justifying the (modest) purchase price.
Thoughts?
-B
Like everyone else, I've been trying to figure out the marketing angle. I think the best suggestion so far is the building of an email database which can be very valuable.
On the other hand, NI's Supercharger plug was a freebie last year, and very complete (not crippled). But when the plug was released shortly after, a few nice features were added, justifying the (modest) purchase price.
Thoughts?
-B
Berfab
So many plugins, so little time...
So many plugins, so little time...
- KVRAF
- 9802 posts since 18 Aug, 2007 from NYC
Wait, do the V1 iLoks work with x64 plugins? I've never tried to use any as my iLok has been collecting dust since iLok 2 was announced and there was talk that this was necessary for x64 plugs.whyterabbyt wrote:Yup, what standalone says. I have three old V1 iLoks and they all work.standalone wrote:No, it still works right. Some developers only admit lLok2 for their products, but this is not the case.Shabdahbriah wrote:Quick question regarding Ilok site registration.
I have an old ilok key (the transparent 'blue' one) with a couple of Motu instruments on it, which are currently NOT installed on any machine. Is it true that the ilok "registration" no longer supports that key?
thanks.