Agreed. Anyway even if safe we avoid it too, for example in navy we used just 81 and 73.Uncle E wrote:Does Core 8 use much less CPU than Core 7? Basari, how many of these are you able to load vs. the Amek?
Anyway, it's extremely cool that it's a 2500, that's worth getting even for loading just 1 or 2 instances. UA is rumored to be coming out with one soon but there's a high likelihood it'll eat a lot of DSP (based on their other recent compressors) and I'd rather get Pink with its EQ and preamp models (UA's 550 isn't one of their better EQ's, IMO, and they didn't properly model a 312 or 512, not even in the Vision Unison channel strip).
Regarding trademarks, companies can't trademark numbers like 2500, 550, 512, and 312 so let's just discuss this in those terms. We'll all know what's being referenced.
I contacted Badari asking kindly to remove the post. Basari is just an user, i don't have control on him, i hope he will listen to me
Now let's speak about how it sounds
For ages they said our compressor tone was good, but compression was not there. I think core8 changes the game.