I am very surprised.
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
Last edited by deleted on Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 12741 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Of course that happens. That's reality. That's the only thing i said. At the same time i said that i'm confident that most users are honnest.michi_mak wrote:assuming that people keep using their keys after selling them is nothing else than accusing them of being thieves...
Are you saying that you think that it never happens?
Please don't limit my explanation. It's part of the reasons. I've listed all reasons here: http://www.mutools.com/info/docs/common ... swers.htmland it was YOU who explained your no resale policy with this assumption...
-
- KVRAF
- 3477 posts since 27 Dec, 2002 from North East England
I've never used Mutools, but I had a look at your website and point 3 would have left a very nasty taste in my mouth were I a customer. You clearly state that one of the reasons that I can't sell my copy of the software is because you cannot be sure that "he/she effectively erases all copies of this MuLab / MUX user key and that he/she does not use it again".
If you really think that most of your users are honest and that this type of piracy would have negligible impact, why mention it at all? Buying the software, selling it, and keeping the install is a pretty complicated way of going about things when the bay of pirates is a mere click away.
For what it's worth, your prices are so low that I probably wouldn't look at buying a second-hand license anyway. I'd rather support the developer at those kind of prices. But if I was a customer, why should customer X's illegal actions impact customer Y's rights as a consumer?
If you really think that most of your users are honest and that this type of piracy would have negligible impact, why mention it at all? Buying the software, selling it, and keeping the install is a pretty complicated way of going about things when the bay of pirates is a mere click away.
For what it's worth, your prices are so low that I probably wouldn't look at buying a second-hand license anyway. I'd rather support the developer at those kind of prices. But if I was a customer, why should customer X's illegal actions impact customer Y's rights as a consumer?
- KVRAF
- 8406 posts since 2 Aug, 2005 from Guitar Land, USA
You have to be in Europe to sell Image line, don't you? What am I supposed to do!!?!?!
The only site for experimental amp sim freeware & MIDI FX: http://runbeerrun.blogspot.com
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
- KVRAF
- 2488 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from Sydney, Australia
The definition of "owning" software is completely different than "owning" your car.Dunbar wrote:Agreed.ferez21 wrote:i think i should have the right to sell something i own...
In software, you only "own" a license to use the software. You agreed to their terms and conditions ('license agreement') at the time of purchase and every time you install the software.
Cowbells!
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
Maybe I shouldn't be banning all these new members with European travel bargain spam in their sigs.RunBeerRun wrote:You have to be in Europe to sell Image line, don't you? What am I supposed to do!!?!?!
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I was playin', but I actually don't agree. If I paid for it, it's tangible.dalor wrote:Cars can't be duplicated. Software can. People want everything for free. This is the core problem.
I'm grateful for all the companies that allow license transfers. Even some of the paid ones (I don't expect to just hose them) I want my mad cash yo! (translated: I want my 30 bucks back )
-
- KVRAF
- 3477 posts since 27 Dec, 2002 from North East England
hibidy wrote:What came first, the car, or the software sales analogies?