This was the case back in the day as well though they charged more for direct drive (often receivers had a button for rumble though). What often gets forgotten these days is the importance of tracking weight, back in the day the "S" shaped arms became all the rage only to be replaced by straight low mass tone arms. For years I had a nice belt drive Dual turntable (Dual as in the brand name not as in two) that was one of the first low mass straight tone arm models on the market, it tracked nicely at .7 grams but the down side was you were stuck with the cartridge because there were no choices for it. My best friend had (still has it) a turntable (but I forget who makes it) a turntable with a laser that tracks ahead of the cartridge, on the other other end it has two servo motors for each axis and it has a built in microprocessor...this thing tracks any imperfection in a records surface and adjusts the tonearms so it always maintains flawless tracking, even on extremely warped records.Uncle E wrote:I have a cheap plastic belt driven Technics. However, my vintage Shure cartridge sounds better on it than on 1200's because it picks up all the motor noise of direct drive turntables.
Yes this guy is that anal, he refused to stop a record in the middle and he also listened to both sides after he started one side for equal wear. He feared if he lifted the needled off in the middle of a record it would leave a pop and if he didn't play both sides one side might wear out fast. He also refused to clean the dust off his dust cover even when it got quite thick because he feared the dust might leave scratches behind...but in his defense his collection of vinyl is still mint and he bought this turntable in the mid 80's. Also he would never let any of my LPs anywhere near his stereo because I was brutal on my vinyl