synthscience Prodigious
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 8519 posts since 7 Apr, 2003
-
- angelboy
- 4586 posts since 21 Aug, 2001 from Larnaca, Cyprus
I love it! I just played with the resonance/filter cutoff and... damn!
-
deaf dunderkwac deaf dunderkwac https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=78199
- KVRAF
- 5247 posts since 15 Aug, 2005 from RainLand featuring RAinRAinRAin
it can bring my dualcore to its' knees begging for mercy
for entertaining porpoises only
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 8519 posts since 7 Apr, 2003
-
jack [psychicmodulation] jack [psychicmodulation] https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2588
- KVRAF
- 1536 posts since 24 Apr, 2002 from New Orleans, LA
I really like this one, but indeed tough on the cpu. If it were a bit lighter, I could see this remaining in my plugin folder.
- KVRAF
- 7748 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
Without wanting to sound like an arse: Are we musicians or sysadmins? It sounds bloody great and that's all that matters to me, I'll adapt my working practices to accomodate it (render, freeze etc. etc.)
I've played terrible old guitars that had trouble staying in tune but had a great sound about them. I worked around the problem, recording songs a section at a time just to capture the vibe.
If it wouldn't run at all due to it's CPU use then fair enough, needs work.
imho.
I've played terrible old guitars that had trouble staying in tune but had a great sound about them. I worked around the problem, recording songs a section at a time just to capture the vibe.
If it wouldn't run at all due to it's CPU use then fair enough, needs work.
imho.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 8519 posts since 7 Apr, 2003
-
- KVRAF
- 7880 posts since 16 Apr, 2003 from -on the outside looking in
GaryG wrote:Without wanting to sound like an arse: Are we musicians or sysadmins? It sounds bloody great and that's all that matters to me, I'll adapt my working practices to accomodate it (render, freeze etc. etc.)
perfect!
..what goes around comes around..
-
- KVRAF
- 2070 posts since 2 Apr, 2004
Sofar this is my fav DC synth too. Bit amazed that it takes more over 30% cpu on my quad, hope there will be an update some day which fixes this.
-
- KVRist
- 37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009 from Portugal
Thanks for your coment, im pleased that it kept your interest - very flattered indeed.. if you came across some patches of your own share it with the crowd..TristezaOrange wrote:I love it! I just played with the resonance/filter cutoff and... damn!
-
- KVRist
- 37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009 from Portugal
Hi Grym, The dev is alive and well.. i ve opened up a thread in the Dc Chat forum, come by if you want to share your coments..grymmjack wrote:no sign of the dev eh?
-
- KVRist
- 37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009 from Portugal
Hi there Jack, your Metatron deserves a big full appraisal indeed - way to go.. i ve tried it and really got caught by its tasteful gated modulations and wicked arpegios and in the end i must say it stands out - for obvious reasons and puting the Prodigious apart its is one of my favs by now (still theres a few ones that i havent tried yet)Jack R wrote:I really like this one, but indeed tough on the cpu. If it were a bit lighter, I could see this remaining in my plugin folder.
The Cpu issue on the Prodigious is a reality but its internall architecture has some degree of density that puts the cpu under considerable strain, particulary in the polyphonic mode (though on mono mode is obviously lighter)
Nevertheless this is a condition that is going to require some work to get around and it is reserved to a near future. So far if you happen to like it as i do, punish your cpu some more.. (dont take it much serious..)
If you have further suggestions to make about Prodigious, come by the Prodigious Synthesiser OpenThread.. in the DC Chat forum, where all coments are wellcome..
-
- KVRist
- 37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009 from Portugal
Really apreciate your preference, and well the Prodigious has a somewhat appetite for the cpu resources but taking in acount the fast development of computer hardware and performance it shouldnt be a big deal (on a machine like the one you have - Quad core) but on older machines say single or even dual cores yes it may be hard to handle (it was developed and tried in a P4 3.2Ghz - 1gb Ram) - yes the update is on the horizon..Barf wrote:Sofar this is my fav DC synth too. Bit amazed that it takes more over 30% cpu on my quad, hope there will be an update some day which fixes this.