Login / Register 0 items | $0.00 New @ KVR
grymmjack
KVRAF
 
8901 posts since 6 Apr, 2003

Postby grymmjack; Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:15 am synthscience Prodigious

where is the support thread/dev? :)

thanks for this!
TristezaOrange
angelboy
 
4600 posts since 20 Aug, 2001, from Larnaca, Cyprus

Postby TristezaOrange; Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:19 pm

I love it! I just played with the resonance/filter cutoff and... damn! :shock:
lucknow13
KVRist
 
469 posts since 14 May, 2006, from toronto canada

Postby lucknow13; Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:35 pm

This is a Prodigious Synth indeed but at times so is the CPU Hit.
deaf dunderkwac
KVRAF
 
5247 posts since 15 Aug, 2005, from RainLand featuring RAinRAinRAin

Postby deaf dunderkwac; Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:05 pm

it can bring my dualcore to its' knees begging for mercy
for entertaining porpoises only
grymmjack
KVRAF
 
8901 posts since 6 Apr, 2003

Postby grymmjack; Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:01 am

no sign of the dev eh?
User avatar
jack [psychicmodulation]
KVRian
 
1379 posts since 23 Apr, 2002, from New Orleans, LA

Postby jack [psychicmodulation]; Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:09 pm

I really like this one, but indeed tough on the cpu. If it were a bit lighter, I could see this remaining in my plugin folder.
User avatar
VSTJuNkiE
KVRAF
 
2508 posts since 18 Jun, 2008, from "nunya"....

Postby VSTJuNkiE; Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:16 pm

Def could use some mercy on the CPU usage......otherwise it's FANTASTIC!
where has all teh freeware gone ':-o'
User avatar
GaryG
KVRAF
 
5647 posts since 13 Jan, 2003, from Kent, UK

Postby GaryG; Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:50 am

Without wanting to sound like an arse: Are we musicians or sysadmins? It sounds bloody great and that's all that matters to me, I'll adapt my working practices to accomodate it (render, freeze etc. etc.)

I've played terrible old guitars that had trouble staying in tune but had a great sound about them. I worked around the problem, recording songs a section at a time just to capture the vibe.

If it wouldn't run at all due to it's CPU use then fair enough, needs work.

imho. :)
()_()
(O.o)
(")(")
grymmjack
KVRAF
 
8901 posts since 6 Apr, 2003

Postby grymmjack; Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:00 am

+1 gary. it's more interesting than most free synths to me right now.
ouroboros
KVRAF
 
7895 posts since 16 Apr, 2003, from -on the outside looking in

Postby ouroboros; Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:05 am

GaryG wrote:Without wanting to sound like an arse: Are we musicians or sysadmins? It sounds bloody great and that's all that matters to me, I'll adapt my working practices to accomodate it (render, freeze etc. etc.)
:lol:
perfect!
Barf
KVRAF
 
2074 posts since 2 Apr, 2004

Postby Barf; Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:14 am

Sofar this is my fav DC synth too. Bit amazed that it takes more over 30% cpu on my quad, hope there will be an update some day which fixes this.
synthescience
KVRist
 
37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009, from Portugal

Postby synthescience; Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:50 pm

TristezaOrange wrote:I love it! I just played with the resonance/filter cutoff and... damn! :shock:


Thanks for your coment, im pleased that it kept your interest - very flattered indeed.. if you came across some patches of your own share it with the crowd..
synthescience
KVRist
 
37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009, from Portugal

Postby synthescience; Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:54 pm

grymmjack wrote:no sign of the dev eh?


Hi Grym, The dev is alive and well.. i ve opened up a thread in the Dc Chat forum, come by if you want to share your coments..
synthescience
KVRist
 
37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009, from Portugal

Postby synthescience; Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 pm

Jack R wrote:I really like this one, but indeed tough on the cpu. If it were a bit lighter, I could see this remaining in my plugin folder.


Hi there Jack, your Metatron deserves a big full appraisal indeed - way to go.. i ve tried it and really got caught by its tasteful gated modulations and wicked arpegios and in the end i must say it stands out - for obvious reasons and puting the Prodigious apart its is one of my favs by now (still theres a few ones that i havent tried yet)

The Cpu issue on the Prodigious is a reality but its internall architecture has some degree of density that puts the cpu under considerable strain, particulary in the polyphonic mode (though on mono mode is obviously lighter)
Nevertheless this is a condition that is going to require some work to get around and it is reserved to a near future. So far if you happen to like it as i do, punish your cpu some more.. (dont take it much serious..)

If you have further suggestions to make about Prodigious, come by the Prodigious Synthesiser OpenThread.. in the DC Chat forum, where all coments are wellcome..
synthescience
KVRist
 
37 posts since 20 Aug, 2009, from Portugal

Postby synthescience; Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:31 pm

Barf wrote:Sofar this is my fav DC synth too. Bit amazed that it takes more over 30% cpu on my quad, hope there will be an update some day which fixes this.


Really apreciate your preference, and well the Prodigious has a somewhat appetite for the cpu resources but taking in acount the fast development of computer hardware and performance it shouldnt be a big deal (on a machine like the one you have - Quad core) but on older machines say single or even dual cores yes it may be hard to handle (it was developed and tried in a P4 3.2Ghz - 1gb Ram) - yes the update is on the horizon..
Next

Moderator: Moderators (Main)

Return to KVR Developer Challenge 2018