[poptastic] Schrully - Not forever
- AcousticHippie
- Topic Starter
- 4525 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
heya.... as posted in the fxpansion forum here's a work-in-progress version with me on the lead vox and schroeng on the backing vox....
well they are not really backing vox - we simply took each take unedited and rendered the whole song.... it sounds pretty funny....
but now I seem to be the backing vocal
Schrully Core - Not Forever
have fun
mully (& schroeng)
well they are not really backing vox - we simply took each take unedited and rendered the whole song.... it sounds pretty funny....
but now I seem to be the backing vocal
Schrully Core - Not Forever
have fun
mully (& schroeng)
Last edited by multree on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:08 am, edited 3 times in total.
- AcousticHippie
- Topic Starter
- 4525 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
Drums are BFD (handprogrammed by me) the rest is real instruments
- AcousticHippie
- Topic Starter
- 4525 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
and a "more mully" version
http://comply.de/mully/Mully-ForeverNot.mp3
still not done but this one's sounding pretty good
http://comply.de/mully/Mully-ForeverNot.mp3
still not done but this one's sounding pretty good
Last edited by multree on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
- AcousticHippie
- Topic Starter
- 4525 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
well nothing I couldn't handle right now....(though a record deal would help) well the backing vox need some editing.... do the lead vox need some, too????
thanks
mullster
thanks
mullster
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
- AcousticHippie
- Topic Starter
- 4525 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
they're already pretty compressed..... anyway I'll keep working since this was only a rough mix and not the final editing
thanks
thanks
- AcousticHippie
- Topic Starter
- 4525 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
gonna rest for a while now and finish the track in about a week....
any comments what I should change are very welcome
any comments what I should change are very welcome
-
- KVRAF
- 2935 posts since 14 Dec, 2003 from Edinburgh
Nice track Mully! Can't give much constructive criticism, but the vocals sound almost chorussed at a couple of points, and perhaps a bit far back?
nice tune though
Jim
nice tune though
Jim
- AcousticHippie
- Topic Starter
- 4525 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
yeah the vocals are a bit too verby and some backing vocs could be reduced.... I agree....
thanks for listening
thanks for listening
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRian
- 876 posts since 30 Nov, 2002 from NE Japan
Much prefer the Mully version - much better than the rather over-the-top choir version
It's a great track, which needs a bit of tweaking with the vox, as everyone said above, but it all pulls together really well. I think it would get a HUGE lift from opening up the track a little - something that you're no doubt gonna fix or alter in a later version- what I'm trying to say is that I would have liked a little more depth in the mix, it still sounds a little brittle to me - backbone it with some bass perhaps?
I could never get this melodic, you know Mully.
It really has potential. Keep on!
It's a great track, which needs a bit of tweaking with the vox, as everyone said above, but it all pulls together really well. I think it would get a HUGE lift from opening up the track a little - something that you're no doubt gonna fix or alter in a later version- what I'm trying to say is that I would have liked a little more depth in the mix, it still sounds a little brittle to me - backbone it with some bass perhaps?
I could never get this melodic, you know Mully.
It really has potential. Keep on!