|
|||
Keith99 wrote: 1. You say dont exceed -9dBFS on transient rich material but then later you say to not exceed -6dBFS on the summing bus. This is the first I had heard of -6dBFS. Do you aim for a max -6 on all buses?
Only on the summing bus, since this is the sum of all signals. I allow myself that particular headroom just for savety purposes. Of course you can go the oldschool way: 0VU and -9dBFS digital peak maximum. Everything is possible as long as you don't overdo it. Keith99 wrote: 2. I have tried following these guides in Cubase 7 with the new control room meter and I find it incredibly difficult to get RMS up while keeping the peaks contained. I guess this is what mastering engineers get paid to do. Are there any tricks to getting a high RMS and still reduce in the peaks? I know compression does that but I would need to slam sounds to achieve the correct RMS and contain the peaks.
I don't have Cubase 7 yet, still on 6. But go away from thinking that both the RMS level and the peak level needs to be hot all the time. The 0 VU or -9dBFS digital limits are just guidelines. And in outboard gear days, the usual definite upper end. You can always pull up the loudness if you want, but while mixing and recording, stay within the limits. This gives you a better fader resolution, analog type plugins respond better, you can easier integrate actual hardware, and you have a more healthy headroom prior to giving your track away for mastering. Also... if you're not experienced with hot signal levels while recording, you're save of clipping. And someone mentioned "crap ADC/DAC's" - yes, you also benefit from using a reference level, since certain ADC/DAC already start to clip at lower levels than 0dBFS. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Member: #9761 Location: Berlin, Germany | ||
|
|||
ok
but thise -6dB or -9 dB how do they relate to the master plugin ? as izotope ozone 5 ? or better.. how do they relate to a song that has yet to be sent to a online master engineer for mastering? ---- My strange songs are here: http://www.reverbnation.com/farguardian http://soundcloud.com/witch-1 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Member: #228211 | ||
|
|||
Thanks for the reply. I feel I am getting closer , just more practice..... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Member: #143846 Location: Yorkshire, England | ||
|
|||
Acrobat wrote: AudioGuy720 wrote: In the future RECORD at -18 dB RMS levels as well instead of reducing them after the fact. It'll make your recordings sound better, especially if you're using budget gear.
why this sounds so wrong to me? Two references to read: Short version: http://www.massivemastering.com/blog/index_files/Proper_Audi o_Recording_Levels.php Long version: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/4 63010-reason-most-itb-mixes-don-t-sound-good-analog-mixes-re stored.html |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Member: #198488 | ||
|
|||
Compyfox wrote: Read: my KVRmarks
OK, so I just read this: "How your host should be used with emulation plugins (based on Slate VCC)" I have to say, thanks. You've really done a great job detailing this out. I really appreciate the time and work you put into sharing this knowledge |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Member: #270417 | ||
|
|||
Seriously, STOP FOCUSING on Ozone.
We only talk about the plain features of your host, no special plugins whatsoever other than VCC maybe. Giusmex wrote: how do they relate to a song that has yet to be sent to a online master engineer for mastering?
Simple: -9dBFS per channel, -6dBFS for the summing bus. It's a personal preference. The average loudness while recording/mixing should not(!) exceed -18dBFS (RMS) or 0 VU (with a reference level of -18dBFS). I hope I made myself clear enough this time around. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Member: #9761 Location: Berlin, Germany | ||
|
|||
You guys should stop aiding and abetting the OP in his quest to waste bits; He needs to learn how to use every single bit that is available !!
use every Damm bit!! . ---- Financial solvency and KVR Mix as well as oil and water. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Member: #143571 | ||
|
|||
billcarroll wrote: Compyfox wrote: Read: my KVRmarks
OK, so I just read this: "How your host should be used with emulation plugins (based on Slate VCC)" I have to say, thanks. You've really done a great job detailing this out. I really appreciate the time and work you put into sharing this knowledge +1 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Nov 2002 Member: #4484 Location: where moose mate, mate | ||
|
|||
contrary wrote: You guys should stop aiding and abetting the OP in his quest to waste bits; He needs to learn how to use every single bit that is available !!
use every Damm bit!! Agreed. We paid for them, we use them all! And the greater travesty is that these bit squandering wanton byte spenders are wasting the MOST significant bits. And then they call it: 'Art'. WTF? Oh well, someday in the distant future, they'll make DAWs with 32bit floating point math and then we'll get our revenge on these red-adverse weak-level weenies. Oh and BTW, digital makes the best square waves! Analog square waves are way too round. ---- perception: the stuff reality is made of. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Member: #56758 Location: Raincoast of Grayland | ||
|
|||
thanx ---- My strange songs are here: http://www.reverbnation.com/farguardian http://soundcloud.com/witch-1 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Member: #228211 | ||
|
|||
contrary wrote: You guys should stop aiding and abetting the OP in his quest to waste bits; He needs to learn how to use every single bit that is available !!
use every Damm bit!! . ......... ---- My strange songs are here: http://www.reverbnation.com/farguardian http://soundcloud.com/witch-1 Last edited by Giusmex on Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Member: #228211 | ||
|
|||
ok compyfox, nopw in my song i am using all of your suggestions
this includes: proper use of VU meter in slate digital vcc proper use of gain staging sill it is difficult to me to fine tuning the volume levels of the several tracks in my song taking into account all of these parameters, but i guess it is only a matter of experience ---- My strange songs are here: http://www.reverbnation.com/farguardian http://soundcloud.com/witch-1 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Member: #228211 |
| KVR Forum Index » Effects | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group





