lotus2035 wrote:codec_spurt wrote:Got it. Nothing that Tremor can't do. No sequencer either. Which is kind of the point with Tremor - it is a drum sequencer!lotus2035 wrote:I sold it because it was a CPU hog. If you want something similar that's not a CPU hog and much cheaper take a look at Drumatic 4.
http://www.drumatic.info/
Yeah but it's not a CPU hog and the lack of sequencer is of no consequence if you use it inside a DAW.
That is true! All very pertinent points and none that any one would contend.
Maybe we could just put this in stone once and for all?
We are just going around in circles here.
Everything you said is true. It was said by about 20 people before you with no argument from FXpansion or the people that use the software.
It is just reiterating the point.
That's ok, new users need to know limitations. I think a cursory google search with kvr in the string might enlighten them very much.
It's more than a hog on my system, it is practically unusable, but I use a very old system. On my main overclocked DAW it is no better or worse than anything else, I have so much horsepower to spare. And that is just an i5. Come on, most people are using i7s now.
And maybe you need to render down. Look, this point has been made. Tremor is a hog. It demands all resources. But having said that, I have had an instance or two going at once on my shitty laptop. Just like Spectral which is known for being a resource hog as well, but for me, I can get three or four instances going of some patches.
I'm not defending it. I am explaining it. I don't care.
But for pity's sake, can we not have any more 'it is a bit of a cpu hog' threads any more? We all know that. But feel free, no law against it. I find it boring but someone else might find it informative. Those that have not got the point.
You do what you can..