Acustica - Magenta Eq

[kylen]

...The Nebula libraries and 3rd parties products haven't this features.

But they will - yes?

[sales@acusticaudio.net]

...The Nebula libraries and 3rd parties products haven't this features.

But they will - yes?

Yes, it's possible in the future; but we need to evaluate.
The application porting has a very high effort.

[cfanyc]

deleted

[kylen]

...The Nebula libraries and 3rd parties products haven't this features.

But they will - yes?

Yes, it's possible in the future; but we need to evaluate.
The application porting has a very high effort.

Translation: our plans formulated with...dogbert's advice
comprise 3 steps
1. milk our loyal customer base who buys everything we
market sight (demo) unseen, dry by marketing at leadt 111 equalizers
which are all unique, unprecedented, sonically miraculous!
2. drive third party library devs who do not pay us for
aqua rights, and set precedent for too low profit margins, out of competition with us.
3. at that time that the cow (excuse me...customers) is bone dry,
consider if our core product, the main reason
our customers bought into acustica, ie nebula, will get
the basic multi-sample loading capsbility that every locked
aqua plugin already has, years now.

Acustica: you can do better than that.

Hmmm...Here's hoping that's not what the future brings...
I was pretty excited about the possibility that all of the recent Acqua discovery and technique would be rolled out to Nebula Pro/Server (at least) and that 3rd party developers would benefit also. Thusly moving the entire Nebula/Acqua experience even higher...here's hoping for that.

[sales@acusticaudio.net]

These changes request many efforts, resources and developments.
Don't worry, we'll do our better to support (all) our customers.

Thanks,
Acustica

[sales@acusticaudio.net]

If you are interested to buy Magenta.

Black Friday & Cyber Monday 2014
http://www.acustica-audio.com/index.php ... &Itemid=92

Best,
Acustica

[Zaphod (giancarlo)]

...The Nebula libraries and 3rd parties products haven't this features.

But they will - yes?

Yes, it's possible in the future; but we need to evaluate.
The application porting has a very high effort.

Translation: our plans formulated with...dogbert's advice
comprise 3 steps
1. milk our loyal customer base who buys everything we
market sight (demo) unseen, dry by marketing at leadt 111 equalizers
which are all unique, unprecedented, sonically miraculous!
2. drive third party library devs who do not pay us for
aqua rights, and set precedent for too low profit margins, out of competition with us.
3. at that time that the cow (excuse me...customers) is bone dry,
consider if our core product, the main reason
our customers bought into acustica, ie nebula, will get
the basic multi-sample loading capsbility that every locked
aqua plugin already has, years now.

Acustica: you can do better than that.

1 - our customerbase has already access to 600 possible high quality libraries. Acqua are specific solutions for the - possibly - best emulations in the world. Our current tech is good for reproducing harmonic distortion and freq response, especially the phase. We have latency, and cpu load, but not simplified minimum phase filters and things like that. Mastering engineers know that. Not fake phase response.
2 we didn't stop anyone or even asked money. 3rd party developers don't pay us, unless they start a collaboration with us. It is the first time I hear about this complete freedom
3 the core product will load acqua plugins as skinned libraries. It already does it in simplified way. The core product is the cheapest and more optimized engine of ever - damn simple creating zero latency plugins, things are different and waaaay different when you couple with big latencies, and multithreading in the name of the ABSOLUTE quality

[Omkar]

giancarlo, you missed the point here,
from the view of Nebula Pro owners you have established a "parallel market"
and they feel lost, riding a dead horse (my interpretation).

Just do a 50% discount for Nebula Pro owners and everything is good.

...The Nebula libraries and 3rd parties products haven't this features.

But they will - yes?

Yes, it's possible in the future; but we need to evaluate.
The application porting has a very high effort.

Translation: our plans formulated with...dogbert's advice
comprise 3 steps
1. milk our loyal customer base who buys everything we
market sight (demo) unseen, dry by marketing at leadt 111 equalizers
which are all unique, unprecedented, sonically miraculous!
2. drive third party library devs who do not pay us for
aqua rights, and set precedent for too low profit margins, out of competition with us.
3. at that time that the cow (excuse me...customers) is bone dry,
consider if our core product, the main reason
our customers bought into acustica, ie nebula, will get
the basic multi-sample loading capsbility that every locked
aqua plugin already has, years now.

Acustica: you can do better than that.

1 - our customerbase has already access to 600 possible high quality libraries. Acqua are specific solutions for the - possibly - best emulations in the world. Our current tech is good for reproducing harmonic distortion and freq response, especially the phase. We have latency, and cpu load, but not simplified minimum phase filters and things like that. Mastering engineers know that. Not fake phase response.
2 we didn't stop anyone or even asked money. 3rd party developers don't pay us, unless they start a collaboration with us. It is the first time I hear about this complete freedom
3 the core product will load acqua plugins as skinned libraries. It already does it in simplified way. The core product is the cheapest and more optimized engine of ever - damn simple creating zero latency plugins, things are different and waaaay different when you couple with big latencies, and multithreading in the name of the ABSOLUTE quality

[Zaphod (giancarlo)]

because I was not maybe clear on a point

- our main product is nebula
- new releases will be able to load acquas, adding features
- current libraries will keep running in nebula, maybe adding a generic skin capability - or they could be skinned by users

What is not clear maybe, nebula and acqua are the same product. They can be merged easily
Current nebula loads acqua as textual libraries, ie you can load magenta presets in nebula

The only difference, acqua will be also indipendent plugins...

Nebula is and will be our main product, ever. Acqua plugins are nebula libraries

[kylen]

giancarlo, you missed the point here,
from the view of Nebula Pro owners you have established a "parallel market"
and they feel lost, riding a dead horse (my interpretation)...

I was a bit concerned about this too so I asked about it both on KVR forum and Acustica-Audio forum. Now I'm not concerned and I believe that Nebula Pro (the engine I have licensed), Acqua and 3rd party developers are progressing naturally. I think my problem was not understanding that everything is [more or less] happening all at once. Anyone familiar with resource management understands that certain projects may appear to be getting more attention and others may appear neglected for a time. That is the way it [temporarily] goes unless unlimited resources are available. I think its nice for Mr. G. to lay that all out and keep us updated from time to time.

Anyway I just picked up AmberEQ and am patiently waiting on Titanium Compressor(s) in the Acqua line, followed by Nebula Pro updates, followed by 3rd party devs releasing even better and better products (Nebula libs & Acqua). Happy World in my mind.

[Omkar]

because I was not maybe clear on a point

- our main product is nebula
- new releases will be able to load acquas, adding features
- current libraries will keep running in nebula, maybe adding a generic skin capability - or they could be skinned by users

What is not clear maybe, nebula and acqua are the same product. They can be merged easily
Current nebula loads acqua as textual libraries, ie you can load magenta presets in nebula

The only difference, acqua will be also indipendent plugins...

Nebula is and will be our main product, ever. Acqua plugins are nebula libraries

Ok, I don`t want to become a megaphone for Nebula Pro owners,
but their situation is not reflected very well.

1. officially it was not that clearly communicated as done now

2. mixing people are mixing now and not tomorrow,
but Nebula Pro owners are consoled to tomorrow.
"It`ll will take time and efforts to have Aquas hooked to Nebula" equals with "tomorrow".
What do they do in the meantime ?

3. how do customers feel after having purchased premium libraries for Nebula Pro
at the costs of a second hand car,
halfway with an NFR EULA which is even illegal in the Eurozone ?
They are sitting on something which cannot be resold
and they are waiting for a vague tomorrow to use latest datest in Nebula.

4. seeing themselves to shell out e.g 150.- Euro/187 Dollar
to invest into an incarnation of the parallel market
without being honored for investments and loyality on Nebula Pro
feels not so well, does it ?

I am sure you have your arguments in contrast,
I just like to point out their situation is not reflected very well.

[Zaphod (giancarlo)]

because I was not maybe clear on a point

- our main product is nebula
- new releases will be able to load acquas, adding features
- current libraries will keep running in nebula, maybe adding a generic skin capability - or they could be skinned by users

What is not clear maybe, nebula and acqua are the same product. They can be merged easily
Current nebula loads acqua as textual libraries, ie you can load magenta presets in nebula

The only difference, acqua will be also indipendent plugins...

Nebula is and will be our main product, ever. Acqua plugins are nebula libraries

Ok, I don`t want to become a megaphone for Nebula Pro owners,
but their situation is not reflected very well.

1. officially it was not that clearly communicated as done now

2. mixing people are mixing now and not tomorrow,
but Nebula Pro owners are consoled to tomorrow.
"It`ll will take time and efforts to have Aquas hooked to Nebula" equals with "tomorrow".
What do they do in the meantime ?

3. how do customers feel after having purchased premium libraries for Nebula Pro
at the costs of a second hand car,
halfway with an NFR EULA which is even illegal in the Eurozone ?
They are sitting on something which cannot be resold
and they are waiting for a vague tomorrow to use latest datest in Nebula.

4. seeing themselves to shell out e.g 150.- Euro/187 Dollar
to invest into an incarnation of the parallel market
without being honored for investments and loyality on Nebula Pro
feels not so well, does it ?

I am sure you have your arguments in contrast,
I just like to point out their situation is not reflected very well.

What is missing? eula what?
What are you asking exactly? I don't follow you

Ask explicitly what you need and we'll try to understand!

[Omkar]

I`m done, nuff said

because I was not maybe clear on a point

- our main product is nebula
- new releases will be able to load acquas, adding features
- current libraries will keep running in nebula, maybe adding a generic skin capability - or they could be skinned by users

What is not clear maybe, nebula and acqua are the same product. They can be merged easily
Current nebula loads acqua as textual libraries, ie you can load magenta presets in nebula

The only difference, acqua will be also indipendent plugins...

Nebula is and will be our main product, ever. Acqua plugins are nebula libraries

Ok, I don`t want to become a megaphone for Nebula Pro owners,
but their situation is not reflected very well.

1. officially it was not that clearly communicated as done now

2. mixing people are mixing now and not tomorrow,
but Nebula Pro owners are consoled to tomorrow.
"It`ll will take time and efforts to have Aquas hooked to Nebula" equals with "tomorrow".
What do they do in the meantime ?

3. how do customers feel after having purchased premium libraries for Nebula Pro
at the costs of a second hand car,
halfway with an NFR EULA which is even illegal in the Eurozone ?
They are sitting on something which cannot be resold
and they are waiting for a vague tomorrow to use latest datest in Nebula.

4. seeing themselves to shell out e.g 150.- Euro/187 Dollar
to invest into an incarnation of the parallel market
without being honored for investments and loyality on Nebula Pro
feels not so well, does it ?

I am sure you have your arguments in contrast,
I just like to point out their situation is not reflected very well.

What is missing? eula what?
What are you asking exactly? I don't follow you

Ask explicitly what you need and we'll try to understand!

[Zaphod (giancarlo)]

there should be a language barrier.
I want to help but I don't understand the question!!
What are you asking?

[cfanyc]

deleted