iZotope Iris 2
-
Resonant- Serpent Resonant- Serpent https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=189941
- KVRist
- 342 posts since 23 Sep, 2008
I went today to check out the upgrade from 1 to 2 and I can't believe how much they want for it. Wow.
What sound do dreams make when they die?
- KVRAF
- 4590 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
I just checked and Iris 2 is discounted down to 200 USD from 300 USD. I wonder if Izotope is still based on same planet where we live?I can't believe how much they want for it
I mean, it's still more than Serum, which is often ranked as the best synth in the market.
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
-
- KVRAF
- 2212 posts since 28 Jul, 2003
I never bothered to upgrade to Iris 2. I tried the demo and it was very buggy, unstable and broken. And now all these months later I find/read that it is still in exactly the same condition.faun2500 wrote:Iris 2 is on sale for $149 so the emails keep telling me. I am an owner of Iris 1 and guess how much it is to upgrade to Iris 2?
$149 it appears!!
Wait another full year and I predict that they will release V3 and charge you again for a "fixed" product.
Yep. You've been fobbed off... as have all the Iris users in this thread posting about their problems.I contacted support about this but they have fobbed me off! Not impressed at the moment!
Anyone else noticed this or have I got my wires crossed?
Look back a bit and have a read of some of Brad (from Izotope's) earlier comments in this thread, and now he is nowhere to be seen.
Same as matthines from Izotope in the RX thread here: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=438380 . The only time they are actually here is when they occasionally step in to do some damage control. Then they disappear again.
My main tools: Kontakt, Omnisphere, Samplemodeling + Audio Modeling. Akai VIP = godsend. Tari's libraries also rock.
-
- KVRian
- 1218 posts since 9 Feb, 2007 from San Ramon, California
I'm bumping this thread up because I just received an email today that the Iris 2 upgrade is on sale for $79. So... it sounds like the prevailing opinion is a "meh" on the upgrade? I confess that I don't have many Iris 1 patches that I made myself, though I did purchase a couple of the expansion packs.
------------------------------------------
Gribs
Gribs
-
- KVRer
- 4 posts since 20 Jun, 2011 from Halifax, NS, Canada
I was enticed to download - and almost as quickly delete - the trial again.I'm bumping this thread up because I just received an email today that the Iris 2 upgrade is on sale for $79. So... it sounds like the prevailing opinion is a "meh" on the upgrade?
It's still as deeply flawed as ever. Same ridiculous UI where envelopes no longer correlate visibly to the sample slots they apply to. Maybe v3 will actually restore the lost functionality, but until then I'm sticking with v1 (which I still love).
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16153 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
The main problem with the new envelopes in iris 2 is that you can't add another modulator like an LFO to modulate the volume of a sample because the values always get added to the envelope (no matter how you set the modulation mode), so when you release the sample the LFO will overwrite the decaying volume which sounds very un-natural/wrong, or when using the modulation wheel the same thing happens. So the only workaround is, to only use the master envelope (5) assigned to the main output to control the overall volume of a patch, then you can use modulators like LFOs/Macros/Modwheel/Aftertouch to control the individual oscillator volumes - but then you loose the ability of individually enveloping the volume of each sample.sjn wrote:I was enticed to download - and almost as quickly delete - the trial again.I'm bumping this thread up because I just received an email today that the Iris 2 upgrade is on sale for $79. So... it sounds like the prevailing opinion is a "meh" on the upgrade?
It's still as deeply flawed as ever. Same ridiculous UI where envelopes no longer correlate visibly to the sample slots they apply to. Maybe v3 will actually restore the lost functionality, but until then I'm sticking with v1 (which I still love).
-
- KVRist
- 52 posts since 18 Mar, 2014
Thanks for that workaround tip, was wondering if I was doing something wrong.
I really like this synth for its creative possibilities, I've made lots of patches from some of my field recordings and combined them with the great synth samples they provided, but it needs some attention from Izotope. I have read about the blight Sampleconstruct has faced with the patches and I may be in for the same if there ever is an Iris 3. I am beginning to wonder about this company I had much confidence in. I hope they are able to turn it around.
I really like this synth for its creative possibilities, I've made lots of patches from some of my field recordings and combined them with the great synth samples they provided, but it needs some attention from Izotope. I have read about the blight Sampleconstruct has faced with the patches and I may be in for the same if there ever is an Iris 3. I am beginning to wonder about this company I had much confidence in. I hope they are able to turn it around.
BC
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16153 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
I don't think we will ever see an Iris 3, they just left us with a half-baken version 2 and then stopped to communicate.
-
- KVRAF
- 2212 posts since 28 Jul, 2003
Yeah.Sampleconstruct wrote:I don't think we will ever see an Iris 3, they just left us with a half-baken version 2 and then stopped to communicate.
I'm hoping you are wrong, but I suspect that you are right.
My main tools: Kontakt, Omnisphere, Samplemodeling + Audio Modeling. Akai VIP = godsend. Tari's libraries also rock.
-
- KVRist
- 112 posts since 3 Dec, 2013 from United States
[quote="Sampleconstruct"][quote="sjn"][quote]I'm bumping this thread up because I just received an email today that the Iris 2 upgrade is on sale for $79. So... it sounds like the prevailing opinion is a "meh" on the upgrade?[/quote]
I was enticed to download - and almost as quickly delete - the trial again.
It's still as deeply flawed as ever. Same ridiculous UI where envelopes no longer correlate visibly to the sample slots they apply to. Maybe v3 will actually restore the lost functionality, but until then I'm sticking with v1 (which I still love).[/quote]
The main problem with the new envelopes in iris 2 is that you can't add another modulator like an LFO to modulate the volume of a sample because the values always get added to the envelope (no matter how you set the modulation mode), so when you release the sample the LFO will overwrite the decaying volume which sounds very un-natural/wrong, or when using the modulation wheel the same thing happens. So the only workaround is, to only use the master envelope (5) assigned to the main output to control the overall volume of a patch, then you can use modulators like LFOs/Macros/Modwheel/Aftertouch to control the individual oscillator volumes - but then you loose the ability of individually enveloping the volume of each sample.[/quote]
Not true. Check out page 52 of the manual. You can combine modulators and set them to multiply.
I was enticed to download - and almost as quickly delete - the trial again.
It's still as deeply flawed as ever. Same ridiculous UI where envelopes no longer correlate visibly to the sample slots they apply to. Maybe v3 will actually restore the lost functionality, but until then I'm sticking with v1 (which I still love).[/quote]
The main problem with the new envelopes in iris 2 is that you can't add another modulator like an LFO to modulate the volume of a sample because the values always get added to the envelope (no matter how you set the modulation mode), so when you release the sample the LFO will overwrite the decaying volume which sounds very un-natural/wrong, or when using the modulation wheel the same thing happens. So the only workaround is, to only use the master envelope (5) assigned to the main output to control the overall volume of a patch, then you can use modulators like LFOs/Macros/Modwheel/Aftertouch to control the individual oscillator volumes - but then you loose the ability of individually enveloping the volume of each sample.[/quote]
Not true. Check out page 52 of the manual. You can combine modulators and set them to multiply.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16153 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
I programmed so many workarounds on Iris 2, believe me, combining Macros/LFOs and envelopes all assigned to the volume of an oscillator is not working in Iris 2, no matter what the manual says. In Iris 1 this is not an issue at all, but the whole architecture changed to the worse in Iris 2, that's just a fact not an opinion.
- KVRAF
- 3879 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
This was one time where KVR actually saved me some money. Iris 2 will never grace me host, and I've grown wary of Izotope's product policy, especially regarding version upgrades. I can just hear a slimy consultant whispering into the ear of the CEO... words like "planned obsolescence", "money money money", "shiny graphics sell plugins, not content", "Apple product cycle", "consumers are like 5-year-olds, they need guidance"...
-
- Banned
- 2238 posts since 19 Dec, 2014
a venture capitalist to be precise .... an ABS Capital Partners venture capitalist to be even more precise.ariston wrote:I can just hear a slimy consultant whispering into the ear of the CEO...
ever since the final quarter of 2013.
- KVRAF
- 3879 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
Ah, I see. Well, talk about seeing your worst fears surpassed. I know it's hard to exist in this competitive market, and it's easy to gripe from the sidelines, but still...Daags wrote:a venture capitalist to be precise .... an ABS Capital Partners venture capitalist to be even more precise.ariston wrote:I can just hear a slimy consultant whispering into the ear of the CEO...
ever since the final quarter of 2013.
Back to the beautiful Iris 2 and her exquisite shortcomings.
-
- KVRist
- 52 posts since 18 Mar, 2014
After some experimenting, I am able to get the lfo/envelopes working per sample the way I expected them to. My oversight(s) was the invert button combined with a negative modulation range. My focus was on the gain parameter and release of the envelope. I am now able to get samples that are independently adjustable and from envelope 5. I was using it wrong. More study for me.
I really like this synth a lot, it has huge potential. I would like to see it further developed. There is nothing like it out there as far as I know.
I really like this synth a lot, it has huge potential. I would like to see it further developed. There is nothing like it out there as far as I know.
BC