Maybe I'm missing something but I would like to know if there is a very important parameter missing, the possibility to adjust the volume (db) of each Split inside a Group.
Thank you.
Is it possible to adjust the split volume?
-
- KVRAF
- 10310 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
Not for a Split, but you can adjust the level of a sample using Boost / Dampen in the Sample Editor - set the valuem then click the button. Have a look at 7.5.1.5 in the User Guide.
Last edited by DarkStar on Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 7 posts since 5 Dec, 2016
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this is not what I'm looking for, what you suggest seems to be a destructive editing, the parameter I'm referring should be in Keyboard mapper tab.
How it is possible to level a group, when you normalize several samples not all sample have the save RMS, so you need to lower and rise volume to level them in a non destructive way. I hope you can understand me.
How it is possible to level a group, when you normalize several samples not all sample have the save RMS, so you need to lower and rise volume to level them in a non destructive way. I hope you can understand me.
-
- KVRAF
- 2400 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
If you really need to have different volume for the different splits/samples, just break up the group into several. (Group menu).
As for philosophy, in general, I'd say multi samples should be normalized as a unit, not individually, esp. nowadays when you have the headroom (hello 24-bit/32-bit samples). Back in 8/12 bit days it might make a lot of sense to try to get as much dynamics as possible, but today it really makes little difference.
As for philosophy, in general, I'd say multi samples should be normalized as a unit, not individually, esp. nowadays when you have the headroom (hello 24-bit/32-bit samples). Back in 8/12 bit days it might make a lot of sense to try to get as much dynamics as possible, but today it really makes little difference.
TX16Wx Software Sampler:
http://www.tx16wx.com/
http://www.tx16wx.com/
-
- KVRAF
- 2400 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
Please do not put words in my mouth. I did neither say per-sample volume was "obsolete" or anything else. I just pointed out that normalizing sample sets to different relative dynamics is imho not a great idea, and the need for _it_ is minimal with modern high bitdepth samples. And in fact will only add to your work load, since you would obviously have to go through a bunch of mappings and adjust relative volumes every time you use them in a new instrument.
Of course, there will be times when you map unrelated samples with intrinsically different dynamics, at which point I guess such adjustments are unavoidable. But to close the loop in my argument, at that point you can just use different groupings.
Of course, there will be times when you map unrelated samples with intrinsically different dynamics, at which point I guess such adjustments are unavoidable. But to close the loop in my argument, at that point you can just use different groupings.
TX16Wx Software Sampler:
http://www.tx16wx.com/
http://www.tx16wx.com/
-
- KVRAF
- 2400 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
Btw, I am not saying its a bad idea to put per-sample attenuation into TX16Wx either. But I doubt it will be in until v3 (a.k.a magic unicorn XIII).
TX16Wx Software Sampler:
http://www.tx16wx.com/
http://www.tx16wx.com/
