Your argument here is rather stupid, no? First "sluggish filters", what's that? Which filters developed by yamaha in the 70s and 80s were "sluggish?" Second, you're now inappropriately adapting my view to try and defend your own pov in lieu of one that you have no experience with and no understanding of. The very thing that you're accusing me of is what you are representing here. You have no experience using FM with filters and so that is what you understand, poorly, and so it's better. This is Dunning Kruger. You don't actually know what I understand and you demonstrably lack the experience to assess it in any meaningful way. The clothing is only sheer in your view because you are ignorant of the very thing that you imagine yourself to be an expert on.jancivil wrote:What if they're sluggish filters? Oh no, filters per se have to make a better instrument because that's what you understand better. That clothing is sheer.Etienne1973 wrote:Main weakness especially of the DX7 Mk1 was/is analog synth emulation. So if you're after typical analog subtractive synthesis sounds with FM synths, then yes, filter(s) can help.ghettosynth wrote:What we have learned is that when you add filters to FM you get a better instrument. That is a fact that no amount of hagiographic whining will change.
You can't use FM8, you don't know about the FS1R or FM in the Nord G1, you have no real understanding of the DX7 algorithms beyond a "picture" on the membrane, you dropped out of school because you couldn't hack the learning, and yet, we should all respect you enough to tolerate your shitty attitude and constantly rude behavior?
A reality check is in order here.