You're welcome. Post back if you run into any trouble!killmaster wrote:Thank you FET! All working and template made. Much appreciated!!! Thanks for the Transformer image too.
Roli Seaboard RISE
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 11519 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
-
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
Thanks! Only issue I have right now is Track Control Settings crashing Cubase (9.0.3). But the MPE setup is working great!Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:You're welcome. Post back if you run into any trouble!killmaster wrote:Thank you FET! All working and template made. Much appreciated!!! Thanks for the Transformer image too.
-
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
I did think of another question. Do I need to check the "CC 74 (Brightness)" box in the Note Expression tab?Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:You're welcome. Post back if you run into any trouble!killmaster wrote:Thank you FET! All working and template made. Much appreciated!!! Thanks for the Transformer image too.
Also, shouldn't "MIDI as NoteExp" be checked as well if I want to record the expression data?
thanks again!
Greg K.
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 11519 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
In the case of Repro-5, which doesn't respond to CC74 in a polyphonic way, no you don't need to check the CC74 box. We're converting CC74 to Breath anyway with the input transformer to make the Slide motion work with the U-he synths.killmaster wrote:I did think of another question. Do I need to check the "CC 74 (Brightness)" box in the Note Expression tab?Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:You're welcome. Post back if you run into any trouble!killmaster wrote:Thank you FET! All working and template made. Much appreciated!!! Thanks for the Transformer image too.
Also, shouldn't "MIDI as NoteExp" be checked as well if I want to record the expression data?
thanks again!
Greg K.
In regards to MIDI as Note Expression, yes, you must check that box. Sorry.
-
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
Thanks Funkybot's Evil Twin!
-
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
What's the difference between Aftertouch and Poly Pressure?
- KVRAF
- 23102 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Aftertouch (a.k.a channel aftertouch or channel pressure) is monophonic (applies to all sounding voices equally), Poly Pressure (a.k.a. polyphonic aftertouch) is polyphonic.
-
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
Thank you! In terms of MPE, if its using channel rotation, it seems like channel pressure (Aftertouch in Cubase) would really have the exact same outcome as Poly Pressure because its sending a different set of values for each note on separate channels and gets recorded that way in Cubase if you are recording note expressions? Or am I confused?EvilDragon wrote:Aftertouch (a.k.a channel aftertouch or channel pressure) is monophonic (applies to all sounding voices equally), Poly Pressure (a.k.a. polyphonic aftertouch) is polyphonic.
- KVRAF
- 23102 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Possibly, not sure how Cubase handles note expressions as I don't use it.
-
- KVRAF
- 5627 posts since 23 Mar, 2006 from pendeLondonmonium
The Seaboard RISE can be configured to accommodate various scenarios. So, you can run it in the original (non-MPE) mode (or 'MPE-off' mode) in the ROLI Dashboard, and here you can choose whether you want poly-pressure or channel-pressure. So you can match the RISE to your software plugin.
Then, in the MPE mode, this option disappears as by default, MPE is configured with channel-pressure (traditional monophonic-aftetrtouch on individual midi channels).
However, if this is not desired, and you'd want to have the traditional aftertouch response in your patch, then at least in Equator, it is easily possible to get the aftertouch response by creating a deep exponential expression curve in the PRESS modulation source.
Then, in the MPE mode, this option disappears as by default, MPE is configured with channel-pressure (traditional monophonic-aftetrtouch on individual midi channels).
When talking about aftertouch (whether poly or mono) it's important to remember that the Seaboards have what's called 'continuous pressure'. This is very different to how 'aftertouch' works and allows for very smooth, continuous expression via pressure. This is especially great for sounds like woodwinds, bowed strings, brass....etc.What's the difference between Aftertouch and Poly Pressure?
However, if this is not desired, and you'd want to have the traditional aftertouch response in your patch, then at least in Equator, it is easily possible to get the aftertouch response by creating a deep exponential expression curve in the PRESS modulation source.
-
- KVRist
- 310 posts since 8 Jul, 2009
Yeah you are right. This is also the reason that configuring certain instruments in Logic Pro to work with MPE controllers involves selecting a counter-intuitive option name - you set it to use MIDI Mono Mode. Where mono actually means one voice per midi channel.killmaster wrote:Thank you! In terms of MPE, if its using channel rotation, it seems like channel pressure (Aftertouch in Cubase) would really have the exact same outcome as Poly Pressure because its sending a different set of values for each note on separate channels and gets recorded that way in Cubase if you are recording note expressions? Or am I confused?EvilDragon wrote:Aftertouch (a.k.a channel aftertouch or channel pressure) is monophonic (applies to all sounding voices equally), Poly Pressure (a.k.a. polyphonic aftertouch) is polyphonic.
-
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
Thanks for this information @himalaya!! good things to know...himalaya wrote:The Seaboard RISE can be configured to accommodate various scenarios. So, you can run it in the original (non-MPE) mode (or 'MPE-off' mode) in the ROLI Dashboard, and here you can choose whether you want poly-pressure or channel-pressure. So you can match the RISE to your software plugin.
Then, in the MPE mode, this option disappears as by default, MPE is configured with channel-pressure (traditional monophonic-aftetrtouch on individual midi channels).
When talking about aftertouch (whether poly or mono) it's important to remember that the Seaboards have what's called 'continuous pressure'. This is very different to how 'aftertouch' works and allows for very smooth, continuous expression via pressure. This is especially great for sounds like woodwinds, bowed strings, brass....etc.What's the difference between Aftertouch and Poly Pressure?
However, if this is not desired, and you'd want to have the traditional aftertouch response in your patch, then at least in Equator, it is easily possible to get the aftertouch response by creating a deep exponential expression curve in the PRESS modulation source.
-
- KVRAF
- 2382 posts since 16 Jan, 2013
Robin Vincent does a pretty comprehensive review of the Seaboard Block here. Covers a lot of the questions people would have about how this whole Seaboard MPE thing works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKqHb5WoVoI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKqHb5WoVoI
- GRRRRRRR!
- 15959 posts since 14 Jun, 2001 from Somewhere else, on principle
Crikey! Who's got 1hr 21min to watch a bloody product review!?!
NOVAkILL : Asus RoG Flow Z13, Core i9, 16GB RAM, Win11 | EVO 16 | Studio One | bx_oberhausen, GR-8, JP6K, Union, Hexeract, Olga, TRK-01, SEM, BA-1, Thorn, Prestige, Spire, Legend-HZ, ANA-2, VG Iron 2 | Uno Pro, Rocket.
-
ChamomileShark ChamomileShark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25116
- KVRAF
- 2834 posts since 12 May, 2004 from Oxford, UK
actually it was alot more thought provoking than I expected. But I had to give it several goes to get though it.
Pastoral, Kosmiche, Ambient Music https://markgriffiths.bandcamp.com/
Experimental Music https://markdaltongriffiths.bandcamp.com/
Experimental Music https://markdaltongriffiths.bandcamp.com/