TAL-Drum (v2.3.3)
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- KVRAF
- 6117 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
There is something that is rather confusing in taldrum , is that slice markers are still shown when they are totally not necessary
Take the following example .
Load a drumloop in pad one , go to slice mode and set it 8
-Now click "apply to pads ' , the sample is now copied to the other 7 pads and the start-end adress of each sample is adjusted (according to the slice position )
What's really confusing is that each pad still has slice markers embedded , which are totally not necessary anymore
Take the following example .
Load a drumloop in pad one , go to slice mode and set it 8
-Now click "apply to pads ' , the sample is now copied to the other 7 pads and the start-end adress of each sample is adjusted (according to the slice position )
What's really confusing is that each pad still has slice markers embedded , which are totally not necessary anymore
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 29 Aug, 2007
Every pad which got a slice refers to the same source loop and there's the same "slice-pattern" left in all these pads, right? That can be still necessary and is even mandatory when you want to drag this pattern as MIDI to your host DAW.gentleclockdivider wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:34 pm There is something that is rather confusing in taldrum , is that slice markers are still shown when they are totally not necessary
Take the following example .
Load a drumloop in pad one , go to slice mode and set it 8
-Now click "apply to pads ' , the sample is now copied to the other 7 pads and the start-end adress of each sample is adjusted (according to the slice position )
What's really confusing is that each pad still has slice markers embedded , which are totally not necessary anymore
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- KVRAF
- 6117 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
Do you guys think the follwoing is a bug ?
When a portion of a sample is set to loop mode ,(picture 1 ) ,
then when assigning a modulation envelope, it should also loop between the loop start and end address but it doesnt' , the modulation envelope just plays through the end .
When a portion of a sample is set to loop mode ,(picture 1 ) ,
then when assigning a modulation envelope, it should also loop between the loop start and end address but it doesnt' , the modulation envelope just plays through the end .
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- KVRAF
- 6117 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
Forget about the previous post , it’s indeed better that the mod envelope remains uncoupled from the loop points
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
-
- KVRian
- 504 posts since 27 Oct, 2004
When using more than one sample on a pad, the pad overview still shows the first sample only as a waveform on that pad, instead of the waveform that results from the union of all samples on that pad. It would be great if this could be changed, as I find it very confusing right now when using lot's of layering.
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 29 Aug, 2007
More precise, it just shows the selected sample as a waveform. For me, that makes sense, since all the above parameters affect only this selected sample-layer (map), unless you select more than one. But if such a multi-selection would be reflected in the waveform as well, this would be great indeed. Hope that's not too effortful to program something like this.fladd wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:23 pm When using more than one sample on a pad, the pad overview still shows the first sample only as a waveform on that pad, instead of the waveform that results from the union of all samples on that pad. It would be great if this could be changed, as I find it very confusing right now when using lot's of layering.
In addition, a quick way to select all layers at once would be a breeze!
To use the mapping-edit-features like pad-edit-features, if needed.
-
- KVRian
- 504 posts since 27 Oct, 2004
For me it always shows the first sample. What I select in the edit screen does not affect which waveform is shown in the grid at all. This is on the newest version.orbeater wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:52 pmMore precise, it just shows the selected sample as a waveform. For me, that makes sense, since all the above parameters affect only this selected sample-layer (map), unless you select more than one. But if such a multi-selection would be reflected in the waveform as well, this would be great indeed. Hope that's not too effortful to program something like this.fladd wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:23 pm When using more than one sample on a pad, the pad overview still shows the first sample only as a waveform on that pad, instead of the waveform that results from the union of all samples on that pad. It would be great if this could be changed, as I find it very confusing right now when using lot's of layering.
In addition, a quick way to select all layers at once would be a breeze!
To use the mapping-edit-features like pad-edit-features, if needed.
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 29 Aug, 2007
My bad, had overlooked that you meant the pad overview.
I wrote about the edit view.
What you wrote, i can confirm that behaviour and would like a change as you mean it as well.