Are there any plans for native support of SFZ export?
Output formats in the pro version - saving SFZ
-
- KVRAF
- 2402 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
-
- KVRist
- 73 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from America
That was 1/3rd of the original reasons I'm a registered fanboy
- was because I'd like to make sample banks most DAWs can accept. As a workaround, will earlier TX16Wx versions such as the x2 series be acceptable for making simple samplebanks that will be used to convert to SFZ?
I'd think a user base could be organized to make simple converters because of the underlying, universal specification of the format, but quite frankly I couldn't make it through the Skinning guide even
So the last question might have been to ask if the v3 Pro serial will work on v2?
So far this is a WONDERFUL SAMPLER and I DO want to know the exact capabilities before I lead some more of the world to your door.
-
- KVRAF
- 2402 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
No. The v3 licence gives you access to pro features in v3 as well as v4 whenever that comes.
TX16Wx Software Sampler:
http://www.tx16wx.com/
http://www.tx16wx.com/
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 527 posts since 25 Aug, 2006
I think that elcallio was not happy with my converter program... I never intended to build something which was not in the sense of the inventor of this beautiful sampler. Now, that V3 seems to be lighter on DSP for me it is not that necessary to have that conversion anymore and my time is short, so don't wait for an update of the converter...
If you really need the conversion, you could use the free V2 version, I think. But it doens't seem to run in parallell... Or did I implement any pro features needed for building nice & simple SFZ? I think not.
If you really need the conversion, you could use the free V2 version, I think. But it doens't seem to run in parallell... Or did I implement any pro features needed for building nice & simple SFZ? I think not.
-
- KVRist
- 73 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from America
Seems odd that something useful like SFZ conversion is changed to "gone" status yet the IDs to run v2 and 3 parallel are the same?
I can see where it might be difficult to convert some of the more complicated aspects.
So the v2 Free workaround will be fine for me I think.
As for people expecting to make use of the underlying universal format, where can they go for more information to try themselves?
I'm going to put Extreme Sample converter on my ToDo list and never have to worry because all the options are there except 64-bit initial support sampling VSTis. That's another $50 and I ain't got it!
Still thanks for the answers for now
mccy it's already done a great deal of good for me, that converter; thanks.
I can see where it might be difficult to convert some of the more complicated aspects.
So the v2 Free workaround will be fine for me I think.
As for people expecting to make use of the underlying universal format, where can they go for more information to try themselves?
I'm going to put Extreme Sample converter on my ToDo list and never have to worry because all the options are there except 64-bit initial support sampling VSTis. That's another $50 and I ain't got it!
Still thanks for the answers for now
mccy it's already done a great deal of good for me, that converter; thanks.-
- KVRAF
- 2402 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
Nothing is gone. mccy:s converter will not work because the program format has evolved in v3, that is all. If he'd like to, it would probably not be difficult to fix, but v3 has somewhat more complicated sound elements relations that need to be considered.
SFZ conversion has never been a core TX feature. The core TX feature is an _open_ file format that you can do what you want with. I.e. not be locked in or lost should the product die.
SFZ conversion has never been a core TX feature. The core TX feature is an _open_ file format that you can do what you want with. I.e. not be locked in or lost should the product die.
TX16Wx Software Sampler:
http://www.tx16wx.com/
http://www.tx16wx.com/
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 527 posts since 25 Aug, 2006
Hm, OK, so maybe I'll have a look at it again. As i am not a Programmer all I did in tx16wx was much too complecated, I think, but maybe I'll find what irritates it.
But the basic tx mappings are not compatible with V2, are they? Could I load tx3 basic Instrument in tx2?
But the basic tx mappings are not compatible with V2, are they? Could I load tx3 basic Instrument in tx2?
-
- KVRAF
- 2402 posts since 27 May, 2005 from Stockholm
-
- KVRist
- 140 posts since 21 Jan, 2008 from New York
Thank you mccy, now we can at least hope for a new version of your wonderful converter!!! I personally can't thank you enough for even saying that you might take a look again, this is a very useful tool for me many others i believe! All I personally need to convert is just the mapping, no ADSR,Filters,FX etc... needed. So, "pitch_keycenter", "lokey", "hikey", "lovel", "hive'l" and of course "sample" is more than enough.
Good luck my friend and if you need any help down the road for testing the tool, i would love to help you accomplish that
-
- KVRist
- 73 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from America
Me too mccy!
Years ago my niece sang a bunch of Ahhs, to make a sample choir. Last year she died; she was a 30-year old nurse and a beautiful woman.
She had already recorded five songs and in tribute of course I want to make a few samplebanks and give one of them to her mother.
It's hard to get people to understand that someone mapping a samplebank might want to share it and it needn't be a colossus of scripts. Just a well exported mellotron is way good enough for a lot of people.
In a format others can use.
Because of the happiness of hearing her voice as a choir (my last attempt which can be greatly improved to remove background noise and re-pitch) my neighbors all want to record their own oohs and aahhs and have me give them a bank too.
If you think that's crazy, my niece's lead vocal on two songs will be used to vocode that choir! An A-list company donated a very nice Vocoder when they heard about it.
Sure, maybe there's other workarounds to exporting a universal sample instrument, but just know people using your tool, it isn't dumb stuff, it's real meaningful and in a way fulfills her work while she was with us. A couple notes were autotuned back then, but I'll do my level best to reveal her happy days singing like the angel she was and I do believe, is.
Years ago my niece sang a bunch of Ahhs, to make a sample choir. Last year she died; she was a 30-year old nurse and a beautiful woman.
She had already recorded five songs and in tribute of course I want to make a few samplebanks and give one of them to her mother.
It's hard to get people to understand that someone mapping a samplebank might want to share it and it needn't be a colossus of scripts. Just a well exported mellotron is way good enough for a lot of people.
In a format others can use.
Because of the happiness of hearing her voice as a choir (my last attempt which can be greatly improved to remove background noise and re-pitch) my neighbors all want to record their own oohs and aahhs and have me give them a bank too.
If you think that's crazy, my niece's lead vocal on two songs will be used to vocode that choir! An A-list company donated a very nice Vocoder when they heard about it.
Sure, maybe there's other workarounds to exporting a universal sample instrument, but just know people using your tool, it isn't dumb stuff, it's real meaningful and in a way fulfills her work while she was with us. A couple notes were autotuned back then, but I'll do my level best to reveal her happy days singing like the angel she was and I do believe, is.
