What is the difference between music and noise? [years-dead slappyfight revived]
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1084 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Your basement
Intention? If it is intention, then is there no such thing as unintended music?
Or is it in the ear of the beholder...in other words, is music a way of hearing?
Or is it in the ear of the beholder...in other words, is music a way of hearing?
- KVRAF
- 1724 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from betwixt
Wow what a cool thought. I remember talking about this in a music theory class in college.
My opinion has changed since then.
Now I think music is in the... eh... ear of the "conditioned" so to speak?
Nothing wrong with 12-tone / standard / what have you.
To a being that communicates in bursts of radio wave, interstellar static could be music.
I've been at the drugs again, haven't I?
My opinion has changed since then.
Now I think music is in the... eh... ear of the "conditioned" so to speak?
Nothing wrong with 12-tone / standard / what have you.
To a being that communicates in bursts of radio wave, interstellar static could be music.
I've been at the drugs again, haven't I?
- KVRAF
- 5948 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Melbourne, Australia
The intention side of the question is very interesting. If these birds are making music on the Les Paul guitar:
Birds play guitar
Where is the intention? Is it the artist who set up the initial conditions for the art (experiment?), or are the birds enjoying the sound and so acting with some level of intent?
Otherwise, I think "music" as we commonly refer to it and in whatever form it takes is an unavoidable (and beautiful) consequence of evolution (billions of years) and more recently cultural bias (thousands of years), combined. We have learned to build tools that help us mimiic nature and we are refining those tools to help us tune in to something far larger than we can comprehend ...
Peace,
Andy.
Birds play guitar
Where is the intention? Is it the artist who set up the initial conditions for the art (experiment?), or are the birds enjoying the sound and so acting with some level of intent?
Otherwise, I think "music" as we commonly refer to it and in whatever form it takes is an unavoidable (and beautiful) consequence of evolution (billions of years) and more recently cultural bias (thousands of years), combined. We have learned to build tools that help us mimiic nature and we are refining those tools to help us tune in to something far larger than we can comprehend ...
Peace,
Andy.
- KVRAF
- 12356 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
I think if everyone tried to make a ven diagram in their head for 'sound', 'music', and 'noise'; Everyone would have music and noise within the sound circle and the intersection of noise and music would vary from person to person.
I hear sound, music, and noise in the same circle. maybe it's more complex than that? I can come up with "musical ideas" that other people also find musical, even if they are at the edge of what some would call music. Do they identify with the sound I made or with my relationship to the sound? If sound is about an emotional attachment, is a sound that disturbs you music too?
I like topics like this because I always end up with more questions than points.
I hear sound, music, and noise in the same circle. maybe it's more complex than that? I can come up with "musical ideas" that other people also find musical, even if they are at the edge of what some would call music. Do they identify with the sound I made or with my relationship to the sound? If sound is about an emotional attachment, is a sound that disturbs you music too?
I like topics like this because I always end up with more questions than points.
- KVRAF
- 12356 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
Unfortunate for whom and why?hibidy wrote:This is clear as most of the stuff out there IS just noise. Unfortunately, the perception is that it's music.
I'm just curious, no flame bait.
-
- KVRist
- 350 posts since 11 May, 2008
As far as I understand it music is a way of perceiving sounds.
If you hear sounds and you can make sense of them, then you are in the presence of music, but if you can't make sense of them then you say it's noise.
Music is a human phenomena. Birds produce sound. Rain produces sound. But they don't make music. However, if you listen to the sounds birds produce and it makes sense to you, then you're hearing music.
Unintended music is there all the time. Many sounds were not produced intended to be music, however someone might listen to them that way.
Others might be music to some people, including the producer, but might be noise to other people.
Then you might ask "what is making sense of a sound?".
I really don't know. That's a neurological thing I guess.
Recent theories use metaphor to explain that. We're picking up Wittgenstein old theories about sense and about all starts in language. the symbolic deciphering. the building of a reality through symbolic means.
Language and musica are not that different, altough music has not a semantics of its own.
Still, music, according to your cultural context and frame of references, can and will evoke things.
When you listen to some sound, through imagination and metaphor your brain will associate it with other stuff you know. It might be a memory, an object, a smell, a sight. And can produce pleasure, sensations...
So, music can indeed trigger events on you. And I guess that is what I understand for "making sense".
If you listen to sounds that can't trigger anything or they trigger defense mechanisms like pain, for instance, you'll consider that unwelcome, and so it is noise.
Noise in conversation is all that can't communicate a thing. Gibberish, static, etc. It's a content that has no referent, no symbol associated in your cultural context. For you "dfhdjsgfjdsh" is noise, because you can't associate anything to it.
In the same way, I believe, sounds that we can't associate (through imagination and metaphot) to anything, will just not communicate anything, make no sense, and thus will be considered noise.
Finally, there's a thin line between noise and silence. Because silence is virtually impossible, sound is allways present, so why do we say we're hearing silence?
At what point there is silence? I believe it's at the point when you hear sound, but you're not focused, and really you're not processing it.
I mean, to have either music or noise, you have to capture sound, use the imagination, reach a metaphor and reach a conclusion: makes sense, or doesn't make sense. When you have sound, but you don't process it, it means you don't even compare it and make that "test of sense" then you say it's silence.
Anyone agrees, disagrees on these theories?
If you hear sounds and you can make sense of them, then you are in the presence of music, but if you can't make sense of them then you say it's noise.
Music is a human phenomena. Birds produce sound. Rain produces sound. But they don't make music. However, if you listen to the sounds birds produce and it makes sense to you, then you're hearing music.
Unintended music is there all the time. Many sounds were not produced intended to be music, however someone might listen to them that way.
Others might be music to some people, including the producer, but might be noise to other people.
Then you might ask "what is making sense of a sound?".
I really don't know. That's a neurological thing I guess.
Recent theories use metaphor to explain that. We're picking up Wittgenstein old theories about sense and about all starts in language. the symbolic deciphering. the building of a reality through symbolic means.
Language and musica are not that different, altough music has not a semantics of its own.
Still, music, according to your cultural context and frame of references, can and will evoke things.
When you listen to some sound, through imagination and metaphor your brain will associate it with other stuff you know. It might be a memory, an object, a smell, a sight. And can produce pleasure, sensations...
So, music can indeed trigger events on you. And I guess that is what I understand for "making sense".
If you listen to sounds that can't trigger anything or they trigger defense mechanisms like pain, for instance, you'll consider that unwelcome, and so it is noise.
Noise in conversation is all that can't communicate a thing. Gibberish, static, etc. It's a content that has no referent, no symbol associated in your cultural context. For you "dfhdjsgfjdsh" is noise, because you can't associate anything to it.
In the same way, I believe, sounds that we can't associate (through imagination and metaphot) to anything, will just not communicate anything, make no sense, and thus will be considered noise.
Finally, there's a thin line between noise and silence. Because silence is virtually impossible, sound is allways present, so why do we say we're hearing silence?
At what point there is silence? I believe it's at the point when you hear sound, but you're not focused, and really you're not processing it.
I mean, to have either music or noise, you have to capture sound, use the imagination, reach a metaphor and reach a conclusion: makes sense, or doesn't make sense. When you have sound, but you don't process it, it means you don't even compare it and make that "test of sense" then you say it's silence.
Anyone agrees, disagrees on these theories?
Play fair and square!
- KVRAF
- 10261 posts since 7 Sep, 2006 from Roseville, CA
Noise is the space after the music, but before the notes?
It's funny, I also remember having similar discussions in music theory classes, but that was many decades and many beers ago.
It's funny, I also remember having similar discussions in music theory classes, but that was many decades and many beers ago.
Logic Pro | PolyBrute | MatrixBrute | MiniFreak | Prophet 6 | Trigon 6 | OB-6 | Rev2 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Polar TI2 | Blofeld | RYTMmk2 | Digitone | Syntakt | Digitakt | Integra-7
- KVRAF
- 2147 posts since 30 Oct, 2006 from Australia, NSW
In common use, the word noise means any unwanted sound. In both analog and digital electronics, noise is an unwanted perturbation to a wanted signal; it is called noise as a generalization of the audible noise heard when listening to a weak radio transmission. Signal noise is heard as acoustic noise if played through a loudspeaker; it manifests as 'snow' on a television or video image. Noise can block, distort, change or interfere with the meaning of a message in both human and electronic communication.(WIKI)
Calling some signal or sound noise is often a subjective distinction. One person's maximum-volume music listening pleasure might be another's unbearable noise.
Noise musician's tend to sketch out wanted noise or soothing noise contrasted with harsh noise, akin to the contrast between loud and soft music. Noise as a genre of music is now more acceptable as our subjection's towards noise unravel and we find similarity and harmony in noise as we do in music? Hmmm
Calling some signal or sound noise is often a subjective distinction. One person's maximum-volume music listening pleasure might be another's unbearable noise.
Noise musician's tend to sketch out wanted noise or soothing noise contrasted with harsh noise, akin to the contrast between loud and soft music. Noise as a genre of music is now more acceptable as our subjection's towards noise unravel and we find similarity and harmony in noise as we do in music? Hmmm
http://www.voltagedisciple.com
Patches for PHASEPLANT ACE,PREDATOR, SYNPLANT, SUB BOOM BASS2,PUNCH , PUNCH BD
AALTO,CIRCLE,BLADE and V-Haus Card For Tiptop Audio ONE Module
https://soundcloud.com/somerville-1i
Patches for PHASEPLANT ACE,PREDATOR, SYNPLANT, SUB BOOM BASS2,PUNCH , PUNCH BD
AALTO,CIRCLE,BLADE and V-Haus Card For Tiptop Audio ONE Module
https://soundcloud.com/somerville-1i
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Oh no!!!!!! I'm not going there againjustin3am wrote:Unfortunate for whom and why?hibidy wrote:This is clear as most of the stuff out there IS just noise. Unfortunately, the perception is that it's music.
I'm just curious, no flame bait.
Ok, part of it was just playin' around, but I was serious about perception. Someone else's music is anothers noise....and the other way around.
It just goes with maybe the second of the OP's questions
-
- KVRAF
- 2831 posts since 11 Jun, 2003
Noise is music.... But it sucks
A baby banging on piano keys is also making music... And it also sucks Just making that analogy because my 1 1/2 year old son insists on having his time at the keyboard. He gets jealous when he sees me using it... Lol.. So funny. He watches the meters and the visual audio analyzing tools while he plays, with a huge smile on his face. Anyway, I'm getting off topic..
A baby banging on piano keys is also making music... And it also sucks Just making that analogy because my 1 1/2 year old son insists on having his time at the keyboard. He gets jealous when he sees me using it... Lol.. So funny. He watches the meters and the visual audio analyzing tools while he plays, with a huge smile on his face. Anyway, I'm getting off topic..
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I think maybe then it runs in the familypheeleep wrote:Noise is music.... But it sucks
A baby banging on piano keys is also making music... And it also sucks Just making that analogy because my 1 1/2 year old son insists on having his time at the keyboard. He gets jealous when he sees me using it... Lol.. So funny. He watches the meters and the visual audio analyzing tools while he plays, with a huge smile on his face. Anyway, I'm getting off topic..
-
- KVRian
- 1391 posts since 28 May, 2008 from Saint Paul, MN
Birds gave us melody; the heartbeat gives us rhythm.
Music is the interpretation of sound (or, "noise") linked with sense perception. It derives its meaning from its context; from collective and personal experiences, cultural relevance and the repetitive patterns that the brain creates and enjoys.
You might say that all noise has the potential to be music if it is given a context which is meaningful to the listener.
Music is the interpretation of sound (or, "noise") linked with sense perception. It derives its meaning from its context; from collective and personal experiences, cultural relevance and the repetitive patterns that the brain creates and enjoys.
You might say that all noise has the potential to be music if it is given a context which is meaningful to the listener.
-
- KVRist
- 72 posts since 16 Dec, 2006
Harmony, Disharmony.. Order and Chaos, this is the duality laws of cosmos, and it can apply not only on music and sounds, but on many other subjects as well, like when you are making music out of chaos, or even making chaotic noise out of ordered music. this duality fight stops only in absolute substance level of every phenomena, but in this level of consciousness which is limited by the forces of time and space those two concepts(chaos and order OR any relative duality) are the most important laws of cosmos.
But Imho, Music is the language of unknowable, the language of indescribable, and one of the most important tools for men to communicate with the other side, or perhaps the dark side of everything.
Both music and noise are nothing but different manifestations of core elements of nature.
Cheers
EDIT : sorry for my bad English.
But Imho, Music is the language of unknowable, the language of indescribable, and one of the most important tools for men to communicate with the other side, or perhaps the dark side of everything.
Both music and noise are nothing but different manifestations of core elements of nature.
Cheers
EDIT : sorry for my bad English.
Behold The Beginning Of Sentient Formless Life.. .