lfm wrote:I think that one already exist - everytime I listen to what's on the radio it makes me sick.hibidy wrote: "sea-sick" - The most bitchen sidechain compressor ever made. Will make tracks that will make you so sick, you'll be barfing sidechain goodness over the whole neighborhood. "sea sick" is the perfect sidechain compressor for when pumpy is not good enough. Make your tracks "sick" with "sea-sick"
Studio One 3?
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
-
- KVRAF
- 6155 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
Sure. I already mentioned two of them in this thread earlier, reordering instruments in the rack and renaming instruments in the rack (Halion One #7 etc.) . Some other stuff that fit my personal Cubase (v SX3-4-5) FR list in S1 1.x were...Novalis wrote:Care to elaborate a bit?S1 1.0 had about... 80-90% ... of my longtime Cubase FR's.
Just curious
- Renaming plugin instances.
- Plugin UI's with the full plugin chain on them
- Export Mono & Stereo Stems in one pass.
- Tracks that switched mono/stereo.
- Bouncing instruments to audio directly on the timeline.
- Replacing instruments directly, in place.
- Moving mixer channels directly. (highly annoying)
- Hiding mixer channels and arrange tracks. (scenes / tracklists)
- A mixer that would maximize full screen.
- A mix console that docks.
- A midi editor that docks.
- Seeing all sends and inserts in the mixer at the same time. (a biggie for me at the time, a major annoyance)
- Unlimited sends and inserts.
- Macros listed in a more convenient place, Cubase's are / were listed on the end of a long menu.
Note: ^^^ If Steinberg.net is still archived you could probably find my old FR for what is essentially the S1 Macro toolbar there.
- CD Burning (although I stopped buring CD's long ago that was an old FR)
- Rendering FLAC files and running FLAC on the timeline.
- A collection of metering plugs which curiously, Cubase didn't have any at all then.
There's a lot of other small stuff, some drag and drop related, but all of that stuff above I'd wanted in Cubase for some years.
-
Guido Negraszus Guido Negraszus https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=234755
- KVRist
- 132 posts since 29 Jun, 2010 from Busselton, West Australia
Sorry, just realized that I explained this wrongly, its quite a while since I looked into this. So this is my problem: when I export an album with artwork it shows fine in my media player. However, after I uploaded it to my website for people to download the artwork disappeared (after they downloaded it). Previously this did not happen and I'm still using the same website host. But now thinking about it, maybe it could come from my website host. I don't know how the embedding of artwork technically works but until now I presumed that its "within" or part of the MP3 once exported. But maybe I'm wrong, maybe it is possible that the artwork can be removed from the MP3 file? Just to be sure, I will write to my website technical support.Novalis wrote:egbert wrote:Doesn't a mixdown end up in the media pool? That new file is a change from the DAWs point of view.Yes, I just mastered an album, and it worked fine.Guido Negraszus wrote: Are you saying it still works for you?
I can't really help there, I'm afraid
(You have v2.6.3 installed?)
DAW: Studio One 4.5.3 Professional, Win7 x64, i7 5930K @ 3.5Ghz, VE PRO
Audio: RME ADI-2 PRO, Presonus Studio 1824
Midi: Studiologic Numa Compact, Faderport, S1 RC,
Sounds: Omnisphere, Zebra, Komplete12U, Lexicon, Fabfilter, Soundtoys, Breeze, Waves
Audio: RME ADI-2 PRO, Presonus Studio 1824
Midi: Studiologic Numa Compact, Faderport, S1 RC,
Sounds: Omnisphere, Zebra, Komplete12U, Lexicon, Fabfilter, Soundtoys, Breeze, Waves
-
- KVRAF
- 4205 posts since 21 Oct, 2001 from my bolthole in the south pacific
A new position for the song position line means a new state and hence an invitation to save in most DAWs. As far as the desktop location for a bounce file, does the media pool show the path to it after that?Novalis wrote:Not necessarily.egbert wrote:Doesn't a mixdown end up in the media pool? That new file is a change from the DAWs point of view.
You can export a mixdown e.g. to the desktop, and still both Cubase and S1 want you to do a save after that.
"I got a car battery and two jumper cables that argue different."
Rust Cohle
Rust Cohle
- KVRist
- 340 posts since 18 Sep, 2013
Thank you very much!LawrenceF wrote:Sure.
Interesting... as far as I'm aware of, at least 50% of the things you mentioned are still not implemented in Cubase.
Is it possible that your web host does some kind of conversion to the MP3-files you upload?Guido Negraszus wrote:However, after I uploaded it to my website for people to download the artwork disappeared (after they downloaded it).
In that case, I could imagine that the cover art gets lost in the process somehow.
There's no new position for the song position line, I don't touch anything in arrange.egbert wrote: A new position for the song position line means a new state and hence an invitation to save in most DAWs. As far as the desktop location for a bounce file, does the media pool show the path to it after that?
Since I don't click on "import mixdown to track", it should not be in the media pool at all, but I will check that.
Btw it also happens if I do a digital release in the project page. That's the same as a mixdown, technically.
-
- KVRAF
- 6155 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
Mixdowns making the song file state change may have something to do with how S1 cross references mixes for the project page and all that. The Project page also directly accepts song files, not just audio files, so there's maybe something in the song file XML that directly references the mixdown, not sure.
You could (I suppose) unzip a song file and check the XML before and after to see.
You could (I suppose) unzip a song file and check the XML before and after to see.
-
- KVRAF
- 6155 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
Yeah. As a practical matter, a 1.0 without a very inviting workflow of some kind wouldn't really attract many users because it takes some long years to catch up on some of the more advanced features.Novalis wrote:Interesting... as far as I'm aware of, at least 50% of the things you mentioned are still not implemented in Cubase.
It''s maybe not a coincidence that 1.0 seemed to fill a lot of what were viewed as obvious workflow holes in Cubase.
- KVRian
- 700 posts since 19 Jan, 2008
Too much silence, I don't think they will show/release it now. Maybe in October/November. At least they would've said they have something interesting to show, but I didn't heard/read that yet. Anyone?
- KVRist
- 218 posts since 16 Feb, 2010 from Germany
Whats wrong with the Sound Quality ?hibidy wrote:Well, unless they fix the sound quality, it's over for me
- KVRist
- 310 posts since 21 Oct, 2008 from new england
They said in the beginning of last summer that it would be out by the end of summer of 2014.nIGhT-SoN wrote:Too much silence, I don't think they will show/release it now. Maybe in October/November. At least they would've said they have something interesting to show, but I didn't heard/read that yet. Anyone?
-
- KVRAF
- 6155 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
They also said that the guy who said that was kinda speaking out of school and that comment was not true, but people keep referring to it anyway like it was a broken promise. Which is partly why many companies don't do that, talk about stuff ahead of time, because it almost always goes a little sideways.SWallace wrote:They said in the beginning of last summer that it would be out by the end of summer of 2014.
We've seen Cubase 8, the new Sonar, the new Logic, the new Samp, and they're all really nice imo, really cool products. You'll see the new Studio One (and Reaper, and PT and Live) at some point and the cycle will start all over again. We'll meet back here in 2-3 years and do it all over again.
- KVRist
- 310 posts since 21 Oct, 2008 from new england
Ah nice, thanks Lawrence. Never heard their official response. The only thing that I am dying to get changed is the track re-ordering issue.LawrenceF wrote:They also said that the guy who said that was kinda speaking out of school and that comment was not true, but people keep referring to it anyway like it was a broken promise. Which is partly why many companies don't do that, talk about stuff ahead of time, because it almost always goes a little sideways.SWallace wrote:They said in the beginning of last summer that it would be out by the end of summer of 2014.