Why are there no close to hardware native vst effects?
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1246 posts since 14 Apr, 2008 from /* whitenoise */
/* static noise */
Last edited by noiseresearch on Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
/* whitenoise */ /* abandon */ /* reincarnated */
-
- KVRist
- 314 posts since 27 Nov, 2009
what plug you recomend that are better at sounding analog ?resistent wrote:Soundtoys are for me one of the most overrated plugins.Fred_Abstract wrote:soundtoys stuff is decent when compared to good hardware but depends what you are after.
Last edited by Fred_Abstract on Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:38 pm, edited 5 times in total.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105909 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
To be perfectly honest with you, I've never had had nor likely ever will have the opportunity to sit in front of a "trident" or and "SSL" or whatthef..kever. So kudos for really cool high end stuff that most people can't afford but is really good.
Then there are the rest of us. I like software options. In fact, it's gotten pretty good.
Then there are the rest of us. I like software options. In fact, it's gotten pretty good.
- KVRAF
- 3879 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
Next you're going to say it's all about talent, making music, inspiration and so on. Be realistic!hibidy wrote:To be perfectly honest with you, I've never had had nor likely ever will have the opportunity to sit in front of a "trident" or and "SSL" or whatthef..kever. So kudos for really cool high end stuff that most people can't afford but is really good.
Then there are the rest of us. I like software options. In fact, it's gotten pretty good.
My best friend loves hi-fi equipment and can spend hours and days comparing amplifiers, speakers and A/D converters. He will never understand that I'm happy with my iPod. I always tell him I listen to the music, not the sound, and as long as the sound quality isn't so awful as to obfuscate the music itself, I don't really care. I mean, if you're going to get all orthodox, you might as well eschew ALL recorded music, because NO recording will ever come close to the real experience.
-
- KVRAF
- 10077 posts since 2 Jan, 2005 from somewhere in the woods
that's right folks, don't touch that dial!hibidy wrote:If at first you don't succeed..........
Some people can make good sound from a can opener and a box of kleenex, some people have waves mercury and can't do anything. But these threads are fun.
"It dreamed itself along"
- KVRAF
- 4434 posts since 15 Nov, 2006 from Hell
...except when you do a double blind test on him which will reveal that all he hears is his confirmation biasariston wrote:My best friend loves hi-fi equipment and can spend hours and days comparing amplifiers, speakers and A/D converters. He will never understand that I'm happy with my iPod.
I don't know what to write here that won't be censored, as I can only speak in profanity.
-
- KVRAF
- 2049 posts since 18 Sep, 2003 from Seattle USA
This is a fact for me also, 2 very different experiences...great point!ariston wrote:... you might as well eschew ALL recorded music, because NO recording will ever come close to the real experience.
Sometimes though I just don't want to go to the club in my bathrobe and slippers so some nicely performed, mixed and mastered recorded music has to do...
- KVRAF
- 2022 posts since 15 Aug, 2012 from Australia
Because none of them have sexy names?
'Aphex aural exciter' excluded.
'Aphex aural exciter' excluded.
I'm tired of being insane. I'm going outsane for some fresh air.
-
- KVRian
- 777 posts since 13 Dec, 2011
Thanks for adding that quote, digidennis. (I did not notice the replies asking for references here above just now; you saved me from having to search for that reference myself. So I now owe you one unit of Googling! )whyterabbyt wrote:Me neither. references please.kmonkey wrote:I am curious on how can you claim that about UAD implementing zero delay in their Moog filter? Never heard it before.Ch00rD wrote: In fact, that zero-delay feedback thing that contributes to the awesome sound of Diva's filter was implemented in UA's Moog plug-in a couple of years before u-he managed to pull off that trick.
digidennis wrote:http://www.uaudio.com/blog/moog-multimode-filter-design
As mentioned earlier, "stable" self-oscillation of the filter depends on the fact that some element of the structure saturates, or "clips." This requires inclusion of some form of nonlinearity within the filter's feedback loop. Because of the presence of this nonlinearity, and because of the special one-pole filter structures used, pre-calculation of closed-loop behavior could not be carried out, and the filter had to be implemented directly as a feedback structure. Special techniques were developed to implement this feedback structure without incurring the one sample of delay usually encountered
-
- KVRian
- 777 posts since 13 Dec, 2011
+1. Live music compares to recorded music like sex compares to pr0n.kylen wrote:This is a fact for me also, 2 very different experiences...great point!ariston wrote:... you might as well eschew ALL recorded music, because NO recording will ever come close to the real experience.
Sometimes though I just don't want to go to the club in my bathrobe and slippers so some nicely performed, mixed and mastered recorded music has to do...
- KVRAF
- 3426 posts since 15 Nov, 2006 from Pacific NW
I should note that one of the current UA algorithm developers, Tim Stilson, published a paper on digital emulations of the Moog filter back in 1996. I started working with Tim in 1999, and his code at that point had built-in soft saturation. It wasn't zero delay feedback, though.Ch00rD wrote:Thanks for adding that quote, digidennis. (I did not notice the replies asking for references here above just now; you saved me from having to search for that reference myself. So I now owe you one unit of Googling! )whyterabbyt wrote:Me neither. references please.kmonkey wrote:I am curious on how can you claim that about UAD implementing zero delay in their Moog filter? Never heard it before.Ch00rD wrote: In fact, that zero-delay feedback thing that contributes to the awesome sound of Diva's filter was implemented in UA's Moog plug-in a couple of years before u-he managed to pull off that trick.
digidennis wrote:http://www.uaudio.com/blog/moog-multimode-filter-design
As mentioned earlier, "stable" self-oscillation of the filter depends on the fact that some element of the structure saturates, or "clips." This requires inclusion of some form of nonlinearity within the filter's feedback loop. Because of the presence of this nonlinearity, and because of the special one-pole filter structures used, pre-calculation of closed-loop behavior could not be carried out, and the filter had to be implemented directly as a feedback structure. Special techniques were developed to implement this feedback structure without incurring the one sample of delay usually encountered
I thought that Tim's work was incorporated into the UA Moog plugin when he was hired by them in 2007, but apparently the plugin had been developed before Tim came on board. David Berners worked on the UA Moog plugin, and had been at CCRMA with Tim back in the 1990s.
There was another CCRMA PhD, Harvey Thornburg, that had a presentation in 1998 about different nonlinearities within the Moog filter structure, but this presentation was never published. I know that a few papers came out around 2004 that claimed to "invent" nonlinearities in the digital realization of the Moog filter, but this was part and parcel of the original CCRMA realizations. Reaktor had a similar structure around 1999 or so IIRC, back when it was called "Generator."
Sean Costello
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
"Switched-On Bach." Live experience: hours of the sounds of patchcords being plugged into jacks, chair movement, a tape deck being started, a few seconds of minutes of playing, then more of the preceding. I'll admit, that isn't close to the experience of listening to the recording.ariston wrote:... you might as well eschew ALL recorded music, because NO recording will ever come close to the real experience.
-
- KVRAF
- 4584 posts since 21 Sep, 2005
You should have gone to the Monsters of Rock festival. Bottles and buckets of p*** hitting you in the head. Some of which, some of the people that threw them did not have the good courtesy to put the top back on first. Happy days!Meffy wrote:I'll admit, that isn't close to the experience of listening to the recording.
Still not as good as at Glastonbury though when a thick northener (I know not all northerners are thick, but he was from up north, and very thick) decided it was a good idea to p*** into a receptacle which he somehow miraculously managed to offload the entire contents of onto the back of my trousers and an open bag (as you do) of a young family's baby clothes and sandwiches. Not to mention the back of their legs and trousers including the young kids. Don't know how, but he did.
Think it's fair to say that none of us were the violent type, as if we were we would have beaten him to a bloody pulp on the spot. Still, nice thought.
So yeah, nothing like the recording really.