Exponential Audio Nimbus Reverb
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 443 posts since 12 Feb, 2004
01001001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 00100010 01000100 01100001 01101001 01110011 01111001 00101110 00100010
- KVRAF
- 6245 posts since 25 May, 2002 from Bobo-dioulasso\BF__Geneva/CH
I''ve listened of a few demo, what do you think ?
more conventional than adaptiverb but much more CPU friendly, it tries to be more instantly usuable for producer, both pre-delay and RT60 delay time being tempo based, compression/expansion, tail suppression, tail recovery, etc..., many hints here and there to make it more musician friendly as far as i can judge
nothing really new, but an intelligent conception...
____
P.S. having opened a same topic i just reported it to be deleted, no need for it...
more conventional than adaptiverb but much more CPU friendly, it tries to be more instantly usuable for producer, both pre-delay and RT60 delay time being tempo based, compression/expansion, tail suppression, tail recovery, etc..., many hints here and there to make it more musician friendly as far as i can judge
nothing really new, but an intelligent conception...
____
P.S. having opened a same topic i just reported it to be deleted, no need for it...
- KVRAF
- 10363 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Hmm.. I'm not so sure about this one. Many of Michaels reverbs are very "samey" sounding.. or have a very specific type of sound. Don't get me wrong, they all sound wonderful but do I need another one? I don't think so.
Besides, I already have most of my reverb sends preloaded with FabFilter Pro-MB for the exact purposes of tailoring the reverb with either compression or expansion. I also always have a spare Pro-Q 2 on each send so that I can either EQ the reverb signal or the incoming signal before reverb (for plugins like U-He Protoverb that really benefit from some input filtering). I also have a tendency of adding D16 Decimort on some reverbs..
.. basically this means I'm already doing all of these things and because I own Phoenix, I don't really see any use for Nimbus, unless the upgrade pricing is too good to pass on.
Cheers!
bManic
Besides, I already have most of my reverb sends preloaded with FabFilter Pro-MB for the exact purposes of tailoring the reverb with either compression or expansion. I also always have a spare Pro-Q 2 on each send so that I can either EQ the reverb signal or the incoming signal before reverb (for plugins like U-He Protoverb that really benefit from some input filtering). I also have a tendency of adding D16 Decimort on some reverbs..
.. basically this means I'm already doing all of these things and because I own Phoenix, I don't really see any use for Nimbus, unless the upgrade pricing is too good to pass on.
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
- KVRAF
- 13226 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
Hmmm..
he had the Phoenixverb and the R2...
Which don't sound anything like each other, and certainly to my ears the algorithms within each do sound different... or do you mean his lexicon days or do you mean...?
rsp
he had the Phoenixverb and the R2...
Which don't sound anything like each other, and certainly to my ears the algorithms within each do sound different... or do you mean his lexicon days or do you mean...?
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRAF
- 23502 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
I was wondering the same too - it certainly sounds like he has already been releasing several more reverb plugins than those two he actually really did... "sound very samey or have a very specific type of sound" is most certainly not at all possible with two plugins... (or even three)
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
- KVRAF
- 10363 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
I do mean his two plug-ins.. now soon to be 3 plug-ins. So I disagree then. R2 is definitely not as different from Phoenix as say VVV from Valhalla Room.. in my opinion.
Nimbus seems to be more of the same.. though to be fair, he even says it's based on Phoenix. So yeah.. I'm not seeing the value here.
Nimbus seems to be more of the same.. though to be fair, he even says it's based on Phoenix. So yeah.. I'm not seeing the value here.
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
The examples on the homepage are brillant, like everything from Exponential Audio...
- KVRAF
- 23502 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
hm... but you said "Many of Michaels reverbs are very "samey" sounding.. or have a very specific type of Sound"bmanic wrote:I do mean his two plug-ins.. now soon to be 3 plug-ins. So I disagree then. R2 is definitely not as different from Phoenix as say VVV from Valhalla Room.. in my opinion.
Nimbus seems to be more of the same.. though to be fair, he even says it's based on Phoenix. So yeah.. I'm not seeing the value here.
samey sounding = at least 2
or very specific sounding = at least another one (3)
but "many of" (which refers to the previous - at the very least - three) means not all of them, so = at least another one (4)
which logically means at least four altogether, and even then it would still seem like a strange statement...
sorry, bmanic, I usually really like enjoy your posts, but you'll have to admit that this one really doesn't make much sense...
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
- KVRAF
- 13226 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
Hmmmbmanic wrote:I do mean his two plug-ins.. now soon to be 3 plug-ins. So I disagree then. R2 is definitely not as different from Phoenix as say VVV from Valhalla Room.. in my opinion.
Nimbus seems to be more of the same.. though to be fair, he even says it's based on Phoenix. So yeah.. I'm not seeing the value here.
I often agree with your 'ears'.. Not this time.
I find R2 and phoenixverb very very different, I actually after buying both for PC tried to see if I could get away with only one on the mac to save me money but ended up buying both.
I haven't found an instance where they sound alike, or that I could substitute one for the other without radically changing the sound.
I use phoenixverb all the time, because I sense it more than hear it..That is it sounds very natural, it blends in the background more to me, and its when I turn it off I hear it more than when I turn it on.....
Whereas R2 sounds more like a Lexicon. I use it when I want to Hear the reverb. I don't want it to blend in, I want to hear the presence of the reverb.
rsp
sound sculptist
-
- KVRAF
- 1822 posts since 25 Feb, 2005
This would be my experience too, quite different. From what I gather Nimbus is based on the Phoenix engine not a copy of it with extra compression/filters etczvenx wrote: I use phoenixverb all the time, because I sense it more than hear it..That is it sounds very natural, it blends in the background more to me, and its when I turn it off I hear it more than when I turn it on.....
Whereas R2 sounds more like a Lexicon. I use it when I want to Hear the reverb. I don't want it to blend in, I want to hear the presence of the reverb.
rsp
Last edited by woodsdenis on Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Mac Studio
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12
- KVRian
- 1147 posts since 24 Jul, 2008 from England
- KVRAF
- 35298 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Not sure why this is a new reverb and not just an evolution of Phoenix Verb which is what it appears to be.
- KVRAF
- 13226 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
I agree with you in spirit on this, but I suspect.aMUSEd wrote:Not sure why this is a new reverb and not just an evolution of Phoenix Verb which is what it appears to be.
1. for backward projects compatibility.
2. maybe the upgrade will be generous enough to make this mostly a non issue.
3. it allows phoenix to be a cheaper entry level into what for me are the best software reverbs.
rsp
sound sculptist
-
- KVRAF
- 1822 posts since 25 Feb, 2005
There always is and if you own a bundle you can always upgrade that too. NB if you don't see your bundle upgrade , shoot Michael an email, I got a crazy deal the last time. He does reward existing customers fairly.audiosabre wrote:I'm interested only if there's a fair upgrade price from PhoenixVerb.
Mac Studio
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12