Switchable diatonic limiter function in the Arpeggiator?
-
- KVRAF
- 2911 posts since 3 Mar, 2006
I still think it would be more user friendly if eventually we had a switch for the arp that let us pick scale and choose number of scale tones to shift (which could be a slightly different amount of semi-tones depending on the scale chosen and notes played) rather than semi-tones. I don't know what it would do if you actually pressed down a note that wasn't in the scale though... Either not play it or shift it up/down to a scale tone I guess.
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
Thanks Urs. This is great. I'll try it out later.
Try not to work too hard. It can lead to "strungoutucalitis".
A major cause of people who move to small paradise island's without a clue of the outside world.
Good work on the stripts, thanks again.

Try not to work too hard. It can lead to "strungoutucalitis".
A major cause of people who move to small paradise island's without a clue of the outside world.
Good work on the stripts, thanks again.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 244 posts since 16 Feb, 2003 from Switzerland
So do IMitchK1989 wrote:I still think it would be more user friendly if eventually we had a switch for the arp that let us pick scale and choose number of scale tones to shift
Although I'm sure that script malarky would work very well (all Urs' inventions do), I simply wouldn't use it.
Call me lazy but once I'm in the middle of composing, I'm just not in the right frame of mind to rummage around creating text files and importing them.
cheers,
bagginz
- u-he
- 30189 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Me too. But this way you can have it *now* rather than laterbagginz wrote:So do IMitchK1989 wrote:I still think it would be more user friendly if eventually we had a switch for the arp that let us pick scale and choose number of scale tones to shift![]()
-
- KVRAF
- 2911 posts since 3 Mar, 2006
Yeah, I'm talking from the view of someone who doesn't NEED it though, so I can just wait until "someday"Urs wrote:Me too. But this way you can have it *now* rather than laterbagginz wrote:So do IMitchK1989 wrote:I still think it would be more user friendly if eventually we had a switch for the arp that let us pick scale and choose number of scale tones to shift![]()
I've only had zebra a few days now, and I think it will be AWHILE before I run out of things to do with even the current feature set
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 244 posts since 16 Feb, 2003 from Switzerland
You're a diamond geezer UrsUrs wrote:Me too. But this way you can have it *now* rather than laterbagginz wrote:So do IMitchK1989 wrote:I still think it would be more user friendly if eventually we had a switch for the arp that let us pick scale and choose number of scale tones to shift![]()
Cheers,
bagginz
- KVRAF
- 26943 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
I do understand what you are suggestingbagginz wrote:Judging by this, I'm not sure you understand what I'm suggesting.pdxindy wrote:
You can do a limited amount of 'force scale' using that along with transpose and playing multiple notes. I think it is one of the underused functions in the arp.
Cheers,
bagginz
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 244 posts since 16 Feb, 2003 from Switzerland
Ah, okay.pdxindy wrote:I do understand what you are suggestingbagginz wrote:Judging by this, I'm not sure you understand what I'm suggesting.pdxindy wrote:
You can do a limited amount of 'force scale' using that along with transpose and playing multiple notes. I think it is one of the underused functions in the arp.
Cheers,
bagginz
Cheers,
bagginz
