My lawyer told me to emphasize that this is for educational purposes only.
- Start by copying the Cubase5.exe file to the Desktop. rename it Cubase5_ClassicFont.exe, or whatever.
- Open Cubase5_ClassicFont.exe in your favorite hex-editor. (010 Editor is a nice one)
- Search for "Microsoft Sans Serif". (Or just go directly to the offset mentioned below.)
- You should find 2 occurrences. It's the 2nd one we need to change.
File offset of the string is 0x01497470 in the 32-bit version, and 0x01CD5E00 in the 64-bit version.
- Change it to "MS Sans Serif". This is the 'classic' Cubase font. (Remember to end the string with a trailing hexadecimal zero)
- Save the edited file, move it from the Desktop to the Cubase5 folder.
- Now the font is reverted back to the pre-5.5 font (Which isn't affected by ClearType and doesn't support Cyrillic, I'm afraid Smile )
in the Cubase5_ClassicFont.exe file.
Cubase 5.5 font hack
-
- KVRAF
- 6159 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
A user over at the Cubase forum has described how to hack into the C 5.5 exe file to change that big ugly new font. Works great. I used another font on my system "Candera". New on the left, old on the right.
-
- KVRAF
- 14739 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
In all seriousness, I like the new (default) font better in that screenshot.
-
- KVRian
- 710 posts since 17 Jan, 2005 from Amsterdam
The clunky one on the right that is much harder to read? Just look at the word "Drums". You can't be serious...Compyfox wrote:In all seriousness, I like the new (default) font better in that screenshot.
Just my 2 cents
-
- KVRAF
- 1907 posts since 29 Oct, 2003
Heretic! Repent! Repent!Compyfox wrote:In all seriousness, I like the new (default) font better in that screenshot.
-
- KVRist
- 379 posts since 10 Jul, 2007 from Holland
This was a big complain from many v5.5 users...LawrenceF wrote:To each his own. I'm just passing information.
They should thank you at least.
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
Some people have too much time
Now they fiddling with hex editors to change a font 
Is not really a showstopper to make music isn't it?
On my system the new font is very good to read, no problem.
Is not really a showstopper to make music isn't it?
On my system the new font is very good to read, no problem.
| Links-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6159 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
No offense to you but it's kinda trolling to denigrate a stranger (the guy who found / worked out this hack) who used his own free time to find a solution to an irritating little problem for other strangers.4damind wrote:Some people have too much timeNow they fiddling with hex editors to change a font
Is not really a showstopper to make music isn't it?
Rather than shoot him down for doing that you might want to demonstrate similar behavior. What have you personally contributed to the Internet community and/or your fellow daw users that cost you some of your own free time?
-
- KVRian
- 619 posts since 15 Feb, 2004 from Birmingham, UK
Wow, what a stupid remark. If it takes a couple of minutes of hacking to change the font, resulting in a considerbly more functional working environment for hundreds of hours to follow, why not do it? Or are you saying that because you like the font, no-one should dislike it or change it?4damind wrote:Some people have too much timeNow they fiddling with hex editors to change a font
Is not really a showstopper to make music isn't it?
On my system the new font is very good to read, no problem.
- KVRAF
- 5110 posts since 5 May, 2005 from Stockholm, Sweden
Making decisions based on knee-jerk reactions is rarely the best choice. I like to give new things some time before I make a judgement. I prefer to let it settle in my mind first. A lot of people including myself didn't like the new KVR design for example..But now I do and cant even remember the old design.
Having said that I'm already used to the new fonts in Cubase because the difference between those fonts is negligible in any way that truly matters. Move on already.
Having said that I'm already used to the new fonts in Cubase because the difference between those fonts is negligible in any way that truly matters. Move on already.
-
- KVRian
- 511 posts since 19 Jul, 2008
Well, I tried get used to it, otherwise I would have gone back to version 5.1.1 immediately.
And I don't find the difference between these fonts negligible, and it does matter to me (and apparently other users).
So if you're happy with the new font - great.
I wasn't - but now I am (with the old font).
Now moving on.
Cheers
And I don't find the difference between these fonts negligible, and it does matter to me (and apparently other users).
So if you're happy with the new font - great.
I wasn't - but now I am (with the old font).
Now moving on.
Cheers
- KVRAF
- 5110 posts since 5 May, 2005 from Stockholm, Sweden
Well I meant get used to it after a month or so. Not 5 minutes..losan wrote:Well, I tried get used to it, otherwise I would have gone back to version 5.1.1 immediately.
And I don't find the difference between these fonts negligible, and it does matter to me (and apparently other users).
So if you're happy with the new font - great.
I wasn't - but now I am (with the old font).
Now moving on.
Cheers
Honestly this should only effect people with poor eyesight but I don't think Steinberg should be blamed for that. And going back to a previous version because of a font is hardly moving on.