So they have different synthesis methods. It the sound that matters right? Not everyone cares about "Morphing" so if you take that away from MorphoX you're left with very little...............in my opinion of course. But it's opinion based not on an affiliation with one company or another but on personal preference. Emotica has it right, demo everything and choose what is right for him personally and the OP is going to do the same thing. Let them form their own opinions............Xenox.AFL wrote:Prism is a physical modelling synthesizer and MorphoX is a subtractice synth with the morphing features, this is totally different, guys...!
Frank
linplug morphox to buy or not to buy?
- KVRAF
- 19886 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- KVRAF
- 19886 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
And that's your opinion which I absolutely respect. The difference being that I have no affiliation with Synapse so it matters not to me if someone likes or dislikes Dune. It only matters that I do. I purchased Dune but not Morphox..........who cares? I certainly don't care if you purchase MorphoX and not Dune. But in my opinion the OP should at least try the Dune demo as well as the MorphoX demo to see which (or both or neither) is right for him.penguinfromdeep wrote:Teksonik, Dune is imho nothing special either, stock synth but fun to use and program, versatile too. But sound is standard, it's ok
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- KVRian
- 1204 posts since 14 Oct, 2002 from Germany
Teksonik: I'm quit unhappy when people came up asking for a synth, do they it need it or not..
The reason why they asked is they need a synth with a lot of presets and not a synth why it can do PD or subtractice synthesis...
It has nothing to do if i made sounds for them or not. Just to make things clear...
I like the synthesis and the sound of MorphoX ofcourse... But i like Prism, too.. But they're too much different if you look on the synthesis, but you know, you can make on booth synthies really good patches (and booth have very good patches...)!
Frank
The reason why they asked is they need a synth with a lot of presets and not a synth why it can do PD or subtractice synthesis...
It has nothing to do if i made sounds for them or not. Just to make things clear...
I like the synthesis and the sound of MorphoX ofcourse... But i like Prism, too.. But they're too much different if you look on the synthesis, but you know, you can make on booth synthies really good patches (and booth have very good patches...)!
Frank
- KVRAF
- 3878 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
Well, I can't say I spent a great deal of time with MorphoX, but... it's a very nice-sounding synth, much like a lot of the very nice sounding synths out there. It's got a few individual touches, but overall, if you've got Predator... I don't think you really NEED it (don't know Thor). Get to know Predator inside and out, it's an awesome synth with a lot of options and a great set of FX.
On the other hand, I've got a ton of synths that I don't need. I could probably make do with Zebra, SynthSquad and Alchemy, but I use different ones because I find them inspiring. The workflow is different, and the results will be different. Is it necessary? No. Fun? Hell yes.
So, if MorphoX tickles your fancy and inspires you to make music, AND if you've got the extra cash, then get it by all means.
On the other hand, I've got a ton of synths that I don't need. I could probably make do with Zebra, SynthSquad and Alchemy, but I use different ones because I find them inspiring. The workflow is different, and the results will be different. Is it necessary? No. Fun? Hell yes.
So, if MorphoX tickles your fancy and inspires you to make music, AND if you've got the extra cash, then get it by all means.
- KVRAF
- 19886 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
I'm not sure how you can jump to that conclusion. Maybe they want a synth that's easy or fun to create their own presets on..............Xenox.AFL wrote:Teksonik:
The reason why they asked is they need a synth with a lot of presets and not a synth why it can do PD or subtractice synthesis...
Perhaps people are just curious how others feel but I don't think anyone should take another person's opinion too seriously unless there is no demo of the synth or unless for some reason they can not download and install a demo.....
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- KVRAF
- 19886 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Now that's the spirit.ariston wrote: Is it necessary? No. Fun? Hell yes.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- KVRian
- 1242 posts since 21 Feb, 2010
+100ariston wrote:On the other hand, I've got a ton of synths that I don't need. I could probably make do with Zebra, SynthSquad and Alchemy, but I use different ones because I find them inspiring. The workflow is different, and the results will be different. Is it necessary? No. Fun? Hell yes.
A good example for that is "insert your average VA + THAT feature that makes it outstanding here".
MorphoX is an example for that, so are many other synths, like FireBird+ which seems to be very limited in first place (2 OSCs, one filter, one LFO) but you be amazed what sounds that little thing can make.
I think DUNE needs more time to get into while some other synths have their "secrets" more obvious.
-
- KVRian
- 1074 posts since 1 Jan, 2004
wow. that's the kind of synth I lovepenguinfromdeep wrote:stock synth but fun to use and program, versatile too. But sound is standard, it's ok
Soundbanks: Sylenth, V-Station, Z3TA+, Toxic Biohazard - good EDM Soundbanks
VST Cafe - music production blog
VST Cafe - music production blog
- KVRAF
- 2874 posts since 22 Oct, 2002 from "somewhere between digital and analog"
After demoing both, I think the potential (for both) is all in the programming... 3rd party support is everything these days. The more (quality) programmers in your court, the better the synth for me, that is... I'm not a programmer, and probably don't want to be as I have a limited amount of time to make music as it is, but the amount of support any new synth has, definitely influences my purchase more than say the "potential" to make great sounds. 
-
- KVRian
- 1242 posts since 21 Feb, 2010
That's a pretty good example of the different types of producers out there. Not everyone that likes the sound of synths will desire to be a great sound designer.DHR53 wrote:After demoing both, I think the potential (for both) is all in the programming... 3rd party support is everything these days. The more (quality) programmers in your court, the better the synth for me, that is... I'm not a programmer, and probably don't want to be as I have a limited amount of time to make music as it is, but the amount of support any new synth has, definitely influences my purchase more than say the "potential" to make great sounds.
I think my problem with MorphoX is also that I feel I wouldn't use the morphing to the fullest. I probably would make a patch and then use the morphing to simplify automation. In the same time I could get the same result with some other synths, while assigning different parameters to the mod-wheel. You can go really deep with this feature, but it's also up to the person in front really taking advantage of that.
-
oxoflavourcrisp oxoflavourcrisp https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=244358
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 12 posts since 27 Nov, 2010 from manchester, UK
who is that even aimed at? i try to keep up to date with notifications on what new releases are available hence my interest in morphox. i dont see whats wrong with checking out some of the other synths mentioned after people say they serve them well. :/Xenox.AFL wrote:Sorry, you compare synth who are much too different, the OP should ask next time which "synthdemo" he should impress from the main presets are demosongs, it has really nothing to do with the synth itself, he just searched for something which impressed him...
Well, Prism is a totally different synth compared to MorphoX, Prism is a physical modelling synthesizer and MorphoX is a subtractice synth with the morphing features, this is totally different, guys...!
Frank
-
oxoflavourcrisp oxoflavourcrisp https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=244358
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 12 posts since 27 Nov, 2010 from manchester, UK
those are my thoughts exactly! i have a load of synths that can create the same sounds but the journey to that sound is different in every one. some are more user friendly than others some are more intricate. its like different DAW's. they all get the same job done but they all go about it in a different way. i find reason great for sequencing bass lines but find creating drum patterns and loops more efficient in ableton. they both inspire me in different ways to make music as many of my synths doariston wrote: On the other hand, I've got a ton of synths that I don't need. I could probably make do with Zebra, SynthSquad and Alchemy, but I use different ones because I find them inspiring. The workflow is different, and the results will be different. Is it necessary? No. Fun? Hell yes.
So, if MorphoX tickles your fancy and inspires you to make music, AND if you've got the extra cash, then get it by all means.
-
- KVRAF
- 6242 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from right here, as you can see ...
honestly, morphox has not reinvented the wheel, simply because that's not possible anymore. so what's left? morphox'philosophy is easy: the fun factor in terms of how ridiciously fast one can get great results with this thing is just stunning. there are for sure synths that are more flexible, etc, but the lighting fast useful results that you have by creating one sound, then the other, then _really_ morph through those is highly inspiring - what's more important for music making???
regards,
brok landers
BIGTONEsounddesign
gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man
brok landers
BIGTONEsounddesign
gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man
- KVRAF
- 9091 posts since 28 May, 2005 from Netherneverlands
Absolutely right. That's well said btbrok landers wrote:honestly, morphox has not reinvented the wheel, simply because that's not possible anymore. so what's left? morphox'philosophy is easy: the fun factor in terms of how ridiciously fast one can get great results with this thing is just stunning. there are for sure synths that are more flexible, etc, but the lighting fast useful results that you have by creating one sound, then the other, then _really_ morph through those is highly inspiring - what's more important for music making???
- KVRian
- 1095 posts since 12 Jan, 2011
Every time I read something like this I want to SCREAM! If we are not sharing opinions what good is this forum? What use is your comment?Xenox.AFL wrote:Try the demo and check it out by yourself.... Frank
John: Hey Bob, how's Professor T's history class.
Bob: Why don't you sit in on a class and see for yourself!
John: Thanks Bob, you're a real friend. Thanks for everything.
