Help me choose, the better sax package.
-
- KVRer
- 5 posts since 23 May, 2010
Hi,
So for the past month, I have been searching my socks off on the interwebs, trying to get a better understanding on what the better sax plugins are.
I have narrowed my search down to three;
Chris Hein horns 1.5
http://www.chrishein.net/
MOJO Horn Section
http://www.vir2.com/instruments/mojo-horn-section
Warp IV, Hollywood Studio Contemporary Saxophone Collection.
http://www.warpivmusic.com/Bundles.html
I am not looking for group, or band sounds. I am looking for the most realistic, non synthy sounding, solo saxophone package. Mainly for warm, jazzier style songs, which I can jam with in my spare time.
If I am missing a really decent package from what I have listed, please let me know. I am not really bolted down to price, altho I dont really want to go spending over a grand (GBP, as I am from the uk).
Cheers, hope you can help.
So for the past month, I have been searching my socks off on the interwebs, trying to get a better understanding on what the better sax plugins are.
I have narrowed my search down to three;
Chris Hein horns 1.5
http://www.chrishein.net/
MOJO Horn Section
http://www.vir2.com/instruments/mojo-horn-section
Warp IV, Hollywood Studio Contemporary Saxophone Collection.
http://www.warpivmusic.com/Bundles.html
I am not looking for group, or band sounds. I am looking for the most realistic, non synthy sounding, solo saxophone package. Mainly for warm, jazzier style songs, which I can jam with in my spare time.
If I am missing a really decent package from what I have listed, please let me know. I am not really bolted down to price, altho I dont really want to go spending over a grand (GBP, as I am from the uk).
Cheers, hope you can help.
-
- KVRian
- 508 posts since 6 Nov, 2009
I like the Saxophones from VSL the most. I have a cut-down version that's included with the Special Edition Extended library, so the full library should be worth looking into.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 5 posts since 23 May, 2010
Thank you ever so much with your reply.
Just so I can be a little more clear, are you referring to the following;
http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/442/412/414/268.htm
plus the key/dongle that I would need to get
http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/442/395/561/562/251.htm
Cheers
Just so I can be a little more clear, are you referring to the following;
http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/442/412/414/268.htm
plus the key/dongle that I would need to get
http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/442/395/561/562/251.htm
Cheers
-
- KVRian
- 508 posts since 6 Nov, 2009
You'll want a good reverb plugin since VSL records their stuff dry, but other than that, that's pretty much all you need. Any eLicenser key will do though, it doesn't have to be the official "Vienna Key" (I ended up using the key that came with Cubase). All their instruments come with the standard Vienna Instruments player for free (see to get a better idea of how it works)... but if you're on a Mac, there's a chance that you might want to upgrade to their Pro version... there's this annoying intermediary window you have to click to access the player's GUI (just in OS X, doesn't happen in Windows). No big deal to some I guess, but I couldn't stand it so I ended up upgrading.redstar_dan wrote:Thank you ever so much with your reply.
Just so I can be a little more clear, are you referring to the following;
http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/442/412/414/1034/1206.htm#
plus the key/dongle that I would need to get
http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/442/395/561/562/251.htm
If I went down the VSL route, would I be needing any additional software, other than what I listed?
Cheers
Vienna libraries are typically split in two: Standard and Extended (see this for an idea of what you'd be getting). Both libraries are installed, but which ones you have access to depends on which license you purchased.
Last edited by mgpqa1 on Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 5 posts since 23 May, 2010
Great
Thanks again, I will have a good look at the standard vs extended. What reverb package would you recommend for the saxaphone packages?
-
- KVRian
- 508 posts since 6 Nov, 2009
I haven't tried a whole lot of different reverbs, but I'm happy with LiquidSonics Reverberate and the Samplicity Bricasti M7 IRs so far.
-
- KVRian
- 1480 posts since 14 Jun, 2003
i'd prefer wivi and samplemodeling to any of these.
- KVRAF
- 7788 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
So tempted to just change one letter in the thread title. 
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
I literally read it that way on first glance. My, my, what is happening with my brain?djanthonyw wrote:So tempted to just change one letter in the thread title.
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 2233 posts since 28 Jul, 2003
Tony is correct.Tony Ostinato wrote:i'd prefer wivi and samplemodeling to any of these.
These two set the standard by which all others should be measured.
I would say Samplemodeling has the better solo saxes of the two, for straight, out-of-the-box tone.
You can customise your sax tone far better with WIVI, but you need to buy the the bigger, more expensive version for that.
WIVI also offers sections, which is redundant to you anyway.
I suggest you have a listen to some SM audio demos, and read a few reviews.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Warp IV sounds fantastic and is a FAT sax library. The approach to it is keyswitch-based, you have a lot of *gestures* known to jazz practice keyed by switches, which won't be to everyone's way of working.redstar_dan wrote:Hi,
So for the past month, I have been searching my socks off on the interwebs, trying to get a better understanding on what the better sax plugins are.
I have narrowed my search down to three;
Chris Hein horns 1.5
MOJO Horn Section
Warp IV, Hollywood Studio Contemporary Saxophone Collection.
I am not looking for group, or band sounds. I am looking for the most realistic, non synthy sounding, solo saxophone package. Mainly for warm, jazzier style songs, which I can jam with in my spare time.
I've been right where you are, I looked at the other two's demos and found them very wanting, and not at all convincing. Warp IV is utterly convincing. Hein and Mojo sound like synths even in the demos, Warp IV is very warm and gritty...
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Per the VSL saxes, I have the downloads bass saxophone. The guy they recorded has a very classical embouchere.
In practice, next to Warp IV horns , it's a little light in the loafers IME. I'll use both together, but it tends to take me into another area; there is a big difference in approach. It doesn't have a lot of 'cut', the attack is at times a little 'bassoony' in fact. Guy Bacos has made a sort of film noir, 'smoky tenor sax' type of demo for VSL that really works, but it's still a kind of classical composer's idea of a jazz effect.
I was REALLY sold on samplemodeling via their demos, by the bye, and found that it's some work to get a sound together, if you've a lot of experience with the horn you're using, and are into using expression controllers a lot, it's quite the thing. But expect to more or less build your performance with controllers, a lot of sculpting. I'm keeping the Mr T Sax because of the capacity of that kind of control, but I think it's not for everybody.
In practice, next to Warp IV horns , it's a little light in the loafers IME. I'll use both together, but it tends to take me into another area; there is a big difference in approach. It doesn't have a lot of 'cut', the attack is at times a little 'bassoony' in fact. Guy Bacos has made a sort of film noir, 'smoky tenor sax' type of demo for VSL that really works, but it's still a kind of classical composer's idea of a jazz effect.
I was REALLY sold on samplemodeling via their demos, by the bye, and found that it's some work to get a sound together, if you've a lot of experience with the horn you're using, and are into using expression controllers a lot, it's quite the thing. But expect to more or less build your performance with controllers, a lot of sculpting. I'm keeping the Mr T Sax because of the capacity of that kind of control, but I think it's not for everybody.
- KVRAF
- 5175 posts since 29 Apr, 2006
- KVRAF
- 4807 posts since 10 Feb, 2006 from Stockholm, Sweden
There is a Kore2 package with se... hrm sax and brass sounds. Hey what happened with Soultrane btw? Did GSI even get around to release it?
- KVRian
- 650 posts since 9 Jun, 2004 from Somewhere warm and moist in France
Another vote added to what Tony and Ben have expressed above. For me, Samplemodeling and Wallander are the way to go for saxes (and just about any other wind instrument). I find that each has some little things that the other does not, so, budget allowing, it is nice to have both because sometimes one fits better than the other.ben_horwood wrote:Tony is correct.Tony Ostinato wrote:i'd prefer wivi and samplemodeling to any of these.
These two set the standard by which all others should be measured.
I would say Samplemodeling has the better solo saxes of the two, for straight, out-of-the-box tone.
You can customise your sax tone far better with WIVI, but you need to buy the the bigger, more expensive version for that.
WIVI also offers sections, which is redundant to you anyway.
I suggest you have a listen to some SM audio demos, and read a few reviews.

