|
|||
ooopsss ... did i miss something?
redbull academy tagged: Wagner, Bayreuth, Dragonblood, Opera, Soprano, Bariton, Siegfried, Kriemhild ---- "It dreamed itself along" ![]() |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Member: #53555 Location: from Franco's lost penus back to B. soon | ||
|
|||
Wow, it's crazy how easily threads about new synths here at KVR could turn into a flame war. I'll try to not to contribute to that flame war and instead go back playing with the synth mentioned (both Saurus and Diva and Synthmaster too...).
My own comparison of Saurus and Diva was not for or against any of the both synths. It was just a comparison and to show Saurus could sound analog like and not to show it could sound exactly like Diva. So this is hopefully my last Saurus vs Diva comment in this thread. BTW it seems to be always a problem if developers are talking negative about products of other developers in public. Of course i also understand that they want to defend themselves (And their products) if they have the opinion that someone talks nonsense about their product. As i do sound design myself i try to stay neutral or positive when i comment the work of other sound designers. If i find some sounds bad i usually either say nothing or comment it at a non-public place (e.g. PM). Ingo ---- "Atmospheric Transients" for PPG Wave 3.V "Analog vs Digital" for Blofeld http://soundcloud.com/ingoweidner Last edited by Ingonator on Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:27 am; edited 2 times in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Member: #176645 Location: Hannover, Germany | ||
|
|||
himalaya wrote: Have you really missed all that I wrote, the whole sense of all that I wrote and contributed? [...] perhaps try to see everything in its right context
Oh right. So I guess we're in agreement that cherry picking and then misrepresenting someone else's words in a way that distorts their position to one which is more easily refuted - aka building a strawman - that would be the sign of a poor argument, yeah? - Last edited by hakey on Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Member: #174534 Location: Babylon an ting | ||
|
|||
Ingonator wrote: My own comparison of Saurus and Diva was not for or against any of the both synths. It was just a comparison and to show Saurus could sound analog like and not to show it could sound exactly like Diva. So this is hopefully my last Saurus vs Diva comment in this thread. Ingo Ingo, that's what my input and intention was as well. Sigh. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Member: #102488 Location: pendeLondonmonium | ||
|
|||
himalaya wrote: The Diva example should be taken in relation to pdxindy's Saurus feedback demo. That is the comparison, not my Saurus clip in your quote!
Please, do not be offended, and perhaps try to see everything in its right context. I'm not offended and don't want to take anything on a personal level here. I respect you and your opinion. I understand what you're saying about pdxindie's demo. I must have missed those bits of the conversation. You were presenting two audios in your post to show that Saurus sounds "full, musical, with a woody quality" while you post a sound of Diva which has no chance to sound "full, musical, with a woody quality" when it is played several octaves higher. I wonder how these two exact sounds would compare if you would exchange only the midi of both? You say that this was done to give all the right context? Not everybody is following the whole conversation and still listens to your examples. You don't think that this could lead to a false conclusion? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Aug 2011 Member: #262624 Location: Berlin | ||
|
|||
hakey wrote: himalaya wrote: Have you really missed all that I wrote, the whole sense of all that I wrote and contributed? [...] perhaps try to see everything in its right context
Oh right. So I guess we're in agreement that cherry picking and then misrepresenting someone else's words in a way that distorts their position to one which is more easily refuted - aka building a strawman - that would be the sign of a poor argument, yeah? - Oh no. Again. I already replied to that. Perhaps you missed it? In short, I used your first reactions to those clips. There was no manipulation of your text or building a 'strawman'. Read all again. ok? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Member: #102488 Location: pendeLondonmonium | ||
|
|||
himalaya wrote: Read all again. ok?
Edit - I missed your reply. Okay, friends. Last edited by hakey on Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Member: #174534 Location: Babylon an ting | ||
|
|||
chacka wrote: I must have missed those bits of the conversation.
Then please follow, at least the very recent flow of conversation, as what you wriote has smeared my character, and that's not what you should be doing, right? Quote: Not everybody is following the whole conversation and still listens to your examples. You don't think that this could lead to a false conclusion?
I can't have the power for people to read a page back. That's all you had to do before you showed me in bad light. I was talking with pdxindy and the flow was obvious, what was refered to what. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Member: #102488 Location: pendeLondonmonium | ||
|
|||
hakey wrote: himalaya wrote: In short, I used your first reactions to those clips. There was no manipulation of your text or building a 'strawman'. Read all again. ok?
cherry picking *is* manipulation Cherry picking? Or seeing your first reaction to the clips. It is always the first reaction in comparisons like this that counts. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Member: #102488 Location: pendeLondonmonium | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 May 2009 Member: #208349 Location: New Zealand | ||
|
|||
himalaya wrote: chacka wrote: I must have missed those bits of the conversation.
Then please follow, at least the very recent flow of conversation, as what you wriote has smeared my character, and that's not what you should be doing, right? Quote: Not everybody is following the whole conversation and still listens to your examples. You don't think that this could lead to a false conclusion?
I can't have the power for people to read a page back. That's all you had to do before you showed me in bad light. I was talking with pdxindy and the flow was obvious, what was refered to what. I don't want to smear your character. I just tried very politely to be on topic. And my "I might have missed something" comments were obviously too polite, sorry for that. Can we just leave it at that? No hard feelings here. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Aug 2011 Member: #262624 Location: Berlin | ||
|
|||
himalaya wrote: Cherry picking?
see above edited post And I still say there was cherry picking in order to misrepresent my position - I hadn't commented upon how analog or otherwise Saurus sounded, yet the misidentification of what was or wasn't analog was the theme of your post. That theme was more-or-less "ha! fooled you - you can't tell which is which". Thing is I had never claimed I could... and furthermore you neglected to include a comment in which I clearly indicated I couldn't - that is cherry picking and a classic strawman. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Member: #174534 Location: Babylon an ting | ||
|
|||
hakey wrote: himalaya wrote: Read all again. ok?
Edit - I missed your reply. Okay, friends. Excellente! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Member: #102488 Location: pendeLondonmonium | ||
|
|||
himalaya wrote: hakey wrote: friends.
Excellente! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Member: #174534 Location: Babylon an ting | ||
|
|||
Without reading all 81 pages...is the giveaway still going on? If so, this is my reply (again)
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Member: #81281 Location: Connecticut, USA |
| KVR Forum Index » Instruments | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group








