Sure, you can. Just skip the qualifying statements and jump right into the sweeping generalizations. Oh, wait, you sorta stuck one in there. 2 points.simesf wrote:I can't speak for any one else on this thread but I get the feeling that it should be rechristened 'the antithesist endlessly moaning about all manner of petty grievances thread'.antithesist wrote:Man, there are .. (yet another self righteous rant)
I disagree. I found most of antithesist's post in this thread 'fair and balanced' and preferable to the marketing drek that IK feels compelled to insert at their corporate leisure. I own a great number of IK products - which I purchased and enjoy, in spite of, rather than because of their 'viral marketeers'.simesf wrote: I've bought several IK products over the years for which I've paid good money so I'm a paying customer and no fanboy. I've found their products to range from good to excellent (and CSR I find excellent.) Yes, I do find the endless marketing I see all over the net to be tiresome but IK are no worse than many companies for this and much better than some. I also think that, on this thread, their representatives have handled themselves with considerable restraint and diplomacy in the face of what appears to be your personal crusade to expose their terrible crimes against humanity oh come on get over yourself. You are increasingly reminding me of that 7 year old in the playground that the teacher scolds to stop telling the same tale over and over again.
The crimes against humanity charge against antithesist is exactly the sort of exaggeration that put antithesist on trial in the high court of your mind. He only raised the points, perhaps too often and early, that IK made 'marketing claims' that were more hyperbole than technical accuracy. If we can't discuss these sorts of crimes against auditory integrity here at KVR, then we're reduced to the feline meme vocabulary. Which is ok with me.


