Do you mean automatable?metrosonic wrote:...the really clever bit is that the VoiceMap is itself modulatable
BTW metrosonic: The link in your sig is "httsp", it goes nowhere.
Improvements!
-
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
BTW metrosonic: The link in your sig is "httsp", it goes nowhere.
-
- KVRist
- 214 posts since 6 Jun, 2004
No I meant modulatable - I make a lot of use of Five12's Numerolgy & Cableguys 'MidiShaper' in my productions. The semantics of whether that is automation or modulation is unimportant to me. In the analog world it's stuff that's usually achievable through CV signals hence why I used the term 'modulation' but apologies to the god of synthesis if I'm incorrect in my usage of the term...Howard wrote:Do you mean automatable?metrosonic wrote:...the really clever bit is that the VoiceMap is itself modulatable
JM
------------
https://soundcloud.com/leftside-wobble
-
- KVRist
- 214 posts since 6 Jun, 2004
That was a typo. I use TypeExpander to add my sigs to various forums but for some reason I have to use Https on KVR otherwise it embeds a huge SoundCloud page within my signature (and I always add the 's' manually seeing as KVR is the only place this happens). On that post I put the 's' in the wrong place.Howard wrote: BTW metrosonic: The link in your sig is "httsp", it goes nowhere.
JM
------------
https://soundcloud.com/leftside-wobble
-
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
Apologies grudgingly accepted 
What, no praise for pointing out that the link in your sig... I'll get me coat!
What, no praise for pointing out that the link in your sig... I'll get me coat!
-
- KVRist
- 214 posts since 6 Jun, 2004
Howard wrote:Apologies grudgingly accepted
What, no praise for pointing out that the link in your sig... I'll get me coat!
JM
------------
https://soundcloud.com/leftside-wobble
-
- KVRist
- 84 posts since 27 Apr, 2012
Some kind of A/B comparison between two sounds would be really helpful!
For example: if I am looking for a sound, browsing the presets and find something that I like, I usually edit it to suit my needs. Then if I go on browsing to see if I can find a better sound, I loose all the adjustments I did to the first sound. So it would be really cool if there was an A/B button to load the first sound to A and the second to B and see which one fits the track better. Or maybe just two variations of the same sound to compare them...
I hope you get my weird explanation...
For example: if I am looking for a sound, browsing the presets and find something that I like, I usually edit it to suit my needs. Then if I go on browsing to see if I can find a better sound, I loose all the adjustments I did to the first sound. So it would be really cool if there was an A/B button to load the first sound to A and the second to B and see which one fits the track better. Or maybe just two variations of the same sound to compare them...
I hope you get my weird explanation...
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30189 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yeah, that's one thing we want to tackle but where we haven't found the "groundbreakingness" in concept that motivates us to push it through. We just discussed that recently, I should bring it up again.andow wrote:Some kind of A/B comparison between two sounds would be really helpful!
For example: if I am looking for a sound, browsing the presets and find something that I like, I usually edit it to suit my needs. Then if I go on browsing to see if I can find a better sound, I loose all the adjustments I did to the first sound. So it would be really cool if there was an A/B button to load the first sound to A and the second to B and see which one fits the track better. Or maybe just two variations of the same sound to compare them...
I hope you get my weird explanation...
-
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
The Synth Squad "Load to Mod Slot" feature is pretty neat. It allows you to essentially morph between 2 presets using a modulatoion source. You can see it in action here:Urs wrote:Yeah, that's one thing we want to tackle but where we haven't found the "groundbreakingness" in concept that motivates us to push it through. We just discussed that recently, I should bring it up again.
It's kind of like an XY pad in some ways.
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30189 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yeah... that's awesome, but way over my head...bmrzycki wrote:The Synth Squad "Load to Mod Slot" feature is pretty neat. It allows you to essentially morph between 2 presets using a modulatoion source. You can see it in action here:Urs wrote:Yeah, that's one thing we want to tackle but where we haven't found the "groundbreakingness" in concept that motivates us to push it through. We just discussed that recently, I should bring it up again.
It's kind of like an XY pad in some ways.
-
- KVRAF
- 1942 posts since 29 Aug, 2003 from Austin, TX
What if you dropped your presets into the midi file then create a preset crossover control. Or use like a wavestation xy joy stick, drop a preset on each corner then morph between presets in the midi file.Urs wrote:Yeah... that's awesome, but way over my head...bmrzycki wrote:The Synth Squad "Load to Mod Slot" feature is pretty neat. It allows you to essentially morph between 2 presets using a modulatoion source. You can see it in action here:Urs wrote:Yeah, that's one thing we want to tackle but where we haven't found the "groundbreakingness" in concept that motivates us to push it through. We just discussed that recently, I should bring it up again.
It's kind of like an XY pad in some ways.
Or, load multiple u-he synths with different presets and use the DAW to morph.
Edit: midi folder, I should say, the one where your presets are located.
Riley
Macbook Pro M4, Ableton 12 Suite, NI Komplete
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170 - KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
U-He synthns aren't exactly morph friendly. It may be possible in Zebra if both presets use the exact same modules but that will hardly ever be the case.
In Bazille nad ACE it's simply impossible unless the wires are connected in exactly the same way on both presets again.
A compare feature would surely be nice but morphing would be too much imo.
It's simply too hard (or even impossible) to implement.
Cheers
Dennis
In Bazille nad ACE it's simply impossible unless the wires are connected in exactly the same way on both presets again.
A compare feature would surely be nice but morphing would be too much imo.
It's simply too hard (or even impossible) to implement.
Cheers
Dennis
-
- KVRist
- 214 posts since 6 Jun, 2004
How about we go back to the original request for a simple A/B comparison section within the patch saving functionality. Unsexy maybe but damn useful when tweaking patches.andow wrote:Some kind of A/B comparison between two sounds would be really helpful!
It's unbelievable how a simple FR can 'morph' (all puns intended) to something so unrecognisable within so few messages on a forum!
JM
------------
https://soundcloud.com/leftside-wobble
-
- KVRist
- 84 posts since 27 Apr, 2012
I don't think this function necessarily has to be "groundbreaking"...Urs wrote:Yeah, that's one thing we want to tackle but where we haven't found the "groundbreakingness" in concept that motivates us to push it through. We just discussed that recently, I should bring it up again.
It's just a little feature that would improve the workflow of finding and programming sounds a lot!
It's not like Diva wasn't groundbreaking enough....
Oh, did I mention I was talking about Diva all the time
thanksmetrosonic wrote: How about we go back to the original request for a simple A/B comparison section within the patch saving functionality.
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
the only improvement or feature for Diva i care about at this point is having the Noise source sounding closer to the analogs (as an addition/option ofc).
the current Noise in diva is an idealized bright white noise that u won't hear in an analog sporting an lp24db.
a button switch to a "dark "noise mode, with a darker and more full bodied noise (more mid bass freq), would be useful for nailing accurately some of the early 80s sounds which featured noise (especially if mixed with the OSCs, as posteq cannot fix it).
here's DivaNoise vs real Analog Noise.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/50331508/divan ... gnoise.wav
do not take this example as reference...but possibly use the noise of the ModelD if u still have it there (or possibly obtain a sample of the noise).
but u get an idea what i mean by darker and more full bodied . (although this example is a bit overly dark ).
the current Noise in diva is an idealized bright white noise that u won't hear in an analog sporting an lp24db.
a button switch to a "dark "noise mode, with a darker and more full bodied noise (more mid bass freq), would be useful for nailing accurately some of the early 80s sounds which featured noise (especially if mixed with the OSCs, as posteq cannot fix it).
here's DivaNoise vs real Analog Noise.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/50331508/divan ... gnoise.wav
do not take this example as reference...but possibly use the noise of the ModelD if u still have it there (or possibly obtain a sample of the noise).
but u get an idea what i mean by darker and more full bodied . (although this example is a bit overly dark ).