Thrillerseeker XTC or kush-audio clariphonic dsp ?

[Giusmex]

hi guys

from what i can read here

both of these plugins are capable of adding some "like" and mojo to tracks or mixes


the big difference between them is also 149 euros!!

by the way,

for electronic music what would you suggest? and what is the main difference between them?

thanx

[loopdon]

I recommend you don't even think about stuff like that right now.
I have to tell that to myself again and again. But that's not what you wanted to hear, i guess. I'd put that money towards books or a Sonicacademy deal. Or something like that.

[Compyfox]

hi guys

from what i can read here

both of these plugins are capable of adding some "like" and mojo to tracks or mixes


the big difference between them is also 149 euros!!

Then read this post to find out the difference:
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 35#5131435

for electronic music what would you suggest? and what is the main difference between them?

Learn regular EQing first.

[Giusmex]

sure, i try to learn everything about eq everyday, i know it is one of the most powerful tool to shape sounds;

but i asked to you what you think about the differences between thrillerseeker XTC and clariphonic

thanx

[Compyfox]

Apples and Oranges really. XTC has three bands and variable frequencies compared to Clariphonic's fixed frequencies. Also XTC offers saturation per band, which is controlled globally by the MOJO section.

Both are parallel EQ's, just one's more flexible.

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]

[Giusmex]

in fact, it is what i said before; there are 149 euros of difference

i cannot believe this entirely maybe they are simply different, although both use a saturation step in their process

but it seems true this time, the bootsie one seems more versatile

[@midnight]

Where can I download ThrillseekerXTC? I checked Bootsie's page but didn't see a link in the download section.

[Tp3]

Here :

http://www.kvraudio.com/kvr-developer-challenge/2012/

[Compyfox]

so basically you are saying the freeware is more versatile.. so why not recommend to op to save the money

Maybe the freeware is not his cup of tea? Can always happen. And the Mac crowd is pissed already.

i cannot believe this entirely maybe they are simply different, although both use a saturation step in their process

You sure about that? Haven't tested the software version yet so I can't tell, but it's obviously apparent in the hardware version (overdrive the module, get some mojo in the process - as with every hardware).

But one of Clariphonic DSP's features is actually:
"Incredible clarity, minimal distortion and phase artifacts"

[dusted william]

I really wish I could try out Thrillerseeker, but Clariphonic is like gold to me.

The extra sauce on my tracks.

dw

[The Telenator]

Bootsie's getting better and better every day.