|
|||
Hello fellow sample-lovers!
New update again, as promised. This time it is a single feature, but boy, has this been a long requested one: Switchable Mono/Stereo outputs! Yes, in the TX16Wx professional you can now freely turn the mono outputs into stereo pairs, thus enabling 4-8 stereo outputs. Trust me, this was trickier than it sounds to implement well. Mono pairs can be turned into stereo in the settings page, and the current setup will be saved with the bank data. Please note the setting that determines which bank data files will load output configuration though; by default, only DAW bank data (your project file) will load output configuration, not a bank file read from disk. This is because while TX16Wx internally will happily switch its operating mode, the containing host will not, and you must rebuild your output routing when you change the output configuration. Version 2.1.0 b6 (2013-02-17)
Download as always from http://www.tx16wx.com/ Next up in TX16Wx land will be a special gift to you all, that I hope will forever end the debate on which is the greatest software sampler of all times (hint: the correct answer begins with a T and is hard to pronounce unless you are Swedish). Also, I will add to the effects palette and fix some of the old work flow issues I know of. Happy sampling /C |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 May 2005 Member: #69881 Location: Stockholm | ||
|
|||
Glad as always to see a new build! I'm curious, why can we not convert the four existing stereo busses to mono? Wouldn't it be better to have 16 freely configurable outputs? Not that it's a big deal for me. As I said, I've been content so far with the 4S + 8M setup but it's nice to have options.
elcallio wrote: Next up in TX16Wx land will be a special gift to you all, that I hope will forever end the debate on which is the greatest software sampler of all times...
You're such a tease! Glad to hear you're going to focus on workflow stuff. Little things make such a big difference to the user experience. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Member: #139265 | ||
|
|||
If I convert M1 + M2 to stereo, the stereo group is called "M1+2", which seems kinda weird. I'd suggest labelling the mono outputs starting at 9, so I'd get "S9+10". |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Member: #139265 | ||
|
|||
IXIX wrote: Glad as always to see a new build!
elcallio wrote: Next up in TX16Wx land will be a special gift to you all, that I hope will forever end the debate on which is the greatest software sampler of all times...
You're such a tease! Glad to hear you're going to focus on workflow stuff. Little things make such a big difference to the user experience. +1 to everything here : thank you for the update, you tease me with your (un)-announcement, and i'm glad to know that the overall workflow will be taken care of |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Member: #22903 Location: france | ||
|
|||
elcallio wrote: New update again, as promised.
Thanks for the update! elcallio wrote: Next up in TX16Wx land will be a special gift to you all, that I hope will forever end the debate on which is the greatest software sampler of all times (hint: the correct answer begins with a T and is hard to pronounce unless you are Swedish). Also, I will add to the effects palette and fix some of the old work flow issues I know of.
Can't wait to see what this is all about. ---- W7 64bit Reaper, Alchemy, LuSH-101, Geist, OP-X Pro II, UNO-LX, SynthMaster, ElectraX, TX16Wx, PPG Wave V3, Reason, DCAM Synth Squad, Reaktor, FLStudio |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Mar 2011 Member: #251716 | ||
|
|||
IXIX wrote: If I convert M1 + M2 to stereo, the stereo group is called "M1+2", which seems kinda weird. I'd suggest labelling the mono outputs starting at 9, so I'd get "S9+10".
The name is to remind you that you are looking at the M1 + M2 outputs in pairs. Deal with it. (If you want another reason its that the last pair would be M15 + 16, which is too long to fit comfortably in some menus) |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 May 2005 Member: #69881 Location: Stockholm | ||
|
|||
IXIX wrote: Glad as always to see a new build! I'm curious, why can we not convert the four existing stereo busses to mono? Wouldn't it be better to have 16 freely configurable outputs? Not that it's a big deal for me. As I said, I've been content so far with the 4S + 8M setup but it's nice to have options.
Three reasons:
Nothing that I mention is stuff that could not be dealt with, however I feel that the current solution is "good enough" while keeping a bunch of nice properties that make the code less complex -> less error prone -> good! Cheers /C |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 May 2005 Member: #69881 Location: Stockholm | ||
|
|||
Fairy nuff |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Member: #139265 | ||
|
|||
elcallio wrote: IXIX wrote: If I convert M1 + M2 to stereo, the stereo group is called "M1+2", which seems kinda weird. I'd suggest labelling the mono outputs starting at 9, so I'd get "S9+10".
The name is to remind you that you are looking at the M1 + M2 outputs in pairs. Deal with it. (If you want another reason its that the last pair would be M15 + 16, which is too long to fit comfortably in some menus) So, give us the possibility to rename outputs at will? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Jan 2009 Member: #197719 Location: Croatia | ||
|
|||
The accumulating features of the TX16WX are increasingly exciting!
Two issues: 1. Should the license.txl file be working at this point? 2. The insert values are saved to the txprog file but seem not read back correctly. Only tried on VSTHost. Thanks! Dan |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 16 Dec 2012 Member: #294417 | ||
|
|||
T............ uhm Gnnnnn.. ---- Mulab-MUX-Diversion-TX16Wx-SKNOTE-Charlatan-Valhalla-GordonSmith-YamahaTHR10-Trackspacer-TheDrop/Glue-Drumaxx-VOS-DC8C [i5 2500K @ 4,3GHz] [8Gb DDR3] [200Gb+ SSD][M-Audio Delta 24/96 PCI] |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Member: #8920 Location: Karlskoga, Stockholm, Sweden | ||
|
|||
dansudden wrote: The accumulating features of the TX16WX are increasingly exciting!
Two issues: 1. Should the license.txl file be working at this point? 2. The insert values are saved to the txprog file but seem not read back correctly. Only tried on VSTHost. Thanks! Dan 1.) License is working, yes. If in doubt, just drag&drop the file into the TX16Wx window and it will be installed properly. After that you should have a nice "Pro" message. 2.) Meh. Yes, there is (was) a bug in resolving/setting parameters. I've fixed it here. Thanks for the heads up. Cheers /C |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 May 2005 Member: #69881 Location: Stockholm |
| KVR Forum Index » CWI Technology | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group














