Is talent born or created with hard work and practice

[vurt]

Interesting that someone who writes "shitty" songs managed to headline arenas.

noel?

[VOODOO U]

Listen to Going Nowhere. If you think that's a shitty song then f**k YOU! Ha ha nah just kidding but yeah f**k you.

[vurt]

blur!

[VOODOO U]

Their best song is B.L.U.R.E.M.I.
First album has it's moments.
That's all she wrote.

[pekbro]

Some threads just wont die, no matter how much you try and kill them...

[jancivil]

Interesting that someone who writes "shitty" songs managed to headline arenas.

HAHA! Now we're talkin' pure argument to popularity.

[ghettosynth]

Frank Zappa is right, there's no such thing as shitty music. What you consider shit is liked by many others.

Frank would know.

[Dirtgrain]

Frank Zappa is right, there's no such thing as shitty music. What you consider shit is liked by many others.

Frank would know.

It's true--but you still get to consider it shitty, from your perspective, when you hear it that way.

[donkey tugger]

Knock yerselves out..

[Dirtgrain]

Knock yerselves out..

For sure.

[VOODOO U]

Interesting that someone who writes "shitty" songs managed to headline arenas.

HAHA! Now we're talkin' pure argument to popularity.

Who would you say is more popular, Yngwie Malmsteen or Iggy Pop? Let's not kid ourselves with the answer. I'll go as far as saying Iggy is a legend of rock n roll. He made an absolute mark.
Guess what? The man has never done an arena tour as a headliner.
So no, it's not an argument about popularity. Just because someone may be popular, or in Iggy's case, famous, doesn't mean his music connects with many people.
For whatever reason, Rising Force made a much bigger impact as far as connecting with a large audience yet go ask people what they think of Yngwie and most will have no idea who the f**k you're talking about.

[url=<span class="skimlinks-unlinked">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism</span>/]Knock yerselves out..[/url]

And yet, despite a long history of debate going back to Plato and an increasingly large body of writing, it is still difficult to come to an agreed definition of what, at its core, relativism is, and what philosophical import it has

Unbelievable. All the years of debating relativism by so called intelligent theorists and philosophers dating back to Plato and *I* have to be the one to set it all straight???
Alrighty then! So be it.
Relativism is nothing more than necessary potential difference for dispersment which conjurs life as we know it.
What if everybody was attracted ro living in the Bahamas?
What if everybody was attracted to being a doctor?
What if everybody was attracted to the color red?
God forbid what if everybody was attracted to the same chord progeession?
Art, as we know it, would cease ro exist. Life as we know it wouldn't be vivid because there's no diversity which means no threat as well.
Every man's pleasure is the same and that means no pleasure because how would we know it without difference?
Everything is relative because without it there would be no attraction to move in different directions.
Of course that brings up something else quite unpleasant......fate.
What you are attracted to has been given before birth. It is fate that makes you like what you like.

See how easy that is? And all those idiots wasting time bickering and being pedantic about nonsense when they could've used that time to drink barrells of whiskey.

[donkey tugger]

Interesting that someone who writes "shitty" songs managed to headline arenas.

HAHA! Now we're talkin' pure argument to popularity.

Who would you say is more popular, Yngwie Malmsteen or Iggy Pop? Let's not kid ourselves with the answer. I'll go as far as saying Iggy is a legend of rock n roll. He made an absolute mark.
Guess what? The man has never done an arena tour as a headliner.
So no, it's not an argument about popularity. Just because someone may be popular, or in Iggy's case, famous, doesn't mean his music connects with many people.
For whatever reason, Rising Force made a much bigger impact as far as connecting with a large audience yet go ask people what they think of Yngwie and most will have no idea who the f**k you're talking about.

[url=<span class="skimlinks-unlinked">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism</span>/]Knock yerselves out..[/url]

And yet, despite a long history of debate going back to Plato and an increasingly large body of writing, it is still difficult to come to an agreed definition of what, at its core, relativism is, and what philosophical import it has

Unbelievable. All the years of debating relativism by so called intelligent theorists and philosophers dating back to Plato and *I* have to be the one to set it all straight???
Alrighty then! So be it.
Relativism is nothing more than necessary potential difference for dispersment which conjurs life as we know it.
What if everybody was attracted ro living in the Bahamas?
What if everybody was attracted to being a doctor?
What if everybody was attracted to the color red?
God forbid what if everybody was attracted to the same chord progeession?
Art, as we know it, would cease ro exist. Life as we know it wouldn't be vivid because there's no diversity which means no threat as well.
Every man's pleasure is the same and that means no pleasure because how would we know it without difference?
Everything is relative because without it there would be no attraction to move in different directions.
Of course that brings up something else quite unpleasant......fate.
What you are attracted to has been given before birth. It is fate that makes you like what you like.

See how easy that is? And all those idiots wasting time bickering and being pedantic about nonsense when they could've used that time to drink barrells of whiskey.

What a load of old bollocks.

See how easy that was?

[whyterabbyt]

meh.

[donkey tugger]

minicock1.gif

[whyterabbyt]

looks itchy.