Good iPad audio sequencer.
-
- KVRian
- 1110 posts since 30 Jan, 2004 from UK
A lot of the 'virtual studio' & sequencer Apps I've seen look geared more towards MIDI sequencing. I'd like something that I can use to put together audio as a simple way of putting down ideas & sounds together I've created with other Apps.
I've got loads of music Apps but iSequence is one of the only sequencer Apps I've bought. Great App but I can't really get on with it for this kind of thing. I just want to be able to throw down loop/audio recordings, do basic editing & the ability to slide stuff about freely on each track to sequence. Any recommendations?
I've got loads of music Apps but iSequence is one of the only sequencer Apps I've bought. Great App but I can't really get on with it for this kind of thing. I just want to be able to throw down loop/audio recordings, do basic editing & the ability to slide stuff about freely on each track to sequence. Any recommendations?
-
- KVRAF
- 2097 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from Nearish Detroit, MI
Check out Studio.HD by SoundTrends.
http://www.soundtrends.com/apps/studiohd-1/
It's a lot like the early versions of Sony's ACID software. It does a pretty good job time stretching loops to fit the song's tempo (though it isn't always 100% accurate), it's easy to slide loops and audio around, and the entire interface is contained on one screen (with no tabs, you can still zoom and slide around and stuff). Also, the effects are pretty creative (and up to four effects per track, too!) and sound decent. AND you don't need to pay extra to be able to use all 24-tracks (and each track can have multiple layers, too).
It's got a really clean interface and as long as you don't need a lot of audio editing tools beyond trimming and looping, you might really like it. It's a blast to play with and surprisingly well equipped.
If you need something with a bit more in terms of audio editing, then you'd probably start looking at MultitrackDAW (which is relatively inexpensive) or Meteor (which is not).
http://www.soundtrends.com/apps/studiohd-1/
It's a lot like the early versions of Sony's ACID software. It does a pretty good job time stretching loops to fit the song's tempo (though it isn't always 100% accurate), it's easy to slide loops and audio around, and the entire interface is contained on one screen (with no tabs, you can still zoom and slide around and stuff). Also, the effects are pretty creative (and up to four effects per track, too!) and sound decent. AND you don't need to pay extra to be able to use all 24-tracks (and each track can have multiple layers, too).
It's got a really clean interface and as long as you don't need a lot of audio editing tools beyond trimming and looping, you might really like it. It's a blast to play with and surprisingly well equipped.
If you need something with a bit more in terms of audio editing, then you'd probably start looking at MultitrackDAW (which is relatively inexpensive) or Meteor (which is not).
GLHF! (Gandalf Lives, Hobbits Forever!)
-
- KVRAF
- 2097 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from Nearish Detroit, MI
No problem! Studio.HD is definitely the most approachable, colorful, and has the most creative effects of the three. It does its best to determine the original BPM of the imported loops and stretch them to the project tempo, but sometimes I've found much better results by turning Sync mode (in the loop info panel) to "Off" and just using loops I've made in other apps that I know are at the correct project tempo.
MultitrackDAW is pretty essential, and a good value, it's just got that really fugly (some would call it "functional") interface. It does work well, it's just not all that inspirational.
MultitrackDAW is pretty essential, and a good value, it's just got that really fugly (some would call it "functional") interface. It does work well, it's just not all that inspirational.
GLHF! (Gandalf Lives, Hobbits Forever!)
-
Derek Buddemeyer Derek Buddemeyer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=270698
- KVRist
- 462 posts since 14 Dec, 2011 from Alliance, NE
NanoStudio is really cool too...as well as Music Studio...although Nanostudio let's you import your own samples whereas music studio does not. I'll look into studio HD....give an opinion later!
Rock On!
-
- KVRAF
- 2097 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from Nearish Detroit, MI
I second the recommendation for NanoStudio. It's pretty much essential for anyone with an iPad for it's interface, effects, and routing. If you do a lot of music with loops, and need a lot of creative electronic-music type effects, too, that's where Studio.HD shines.
GLHF! (Gandalf Lives, Hobbits Forever!)
-
- KVRAF
- 1676 posts since 17 Dec, 2002 from Yorkshire
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1110 posts since 30 Jan, 2004 from UK
It does look very impressive that one. When will it be released?bronxsound wrote:not being ipad user but this one is seriously tempting:
http://auriaapp.com/Products/auria
-
- KVRAF
- 1676 posts since 17 Dec, 2002 from Yorkshire
well i don't know as i don't have the hardware and not following the product. but it would be one of the main reasons to get ip3 for me. so far the best i've seen anyway...
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1110 posts since 30 Jan, 2004 from UK
The end of the video states 1st quarter 2012 for release. They've obviously missed that so who knows when it will appear now. No mention of price either. I imagine it could be a costly App somehow. I'm intrigued to know how it runs VST plug-ins as well (video mentions this & shows the 'Vintage Warmer' plug-in running!!).
-
- KVRAF
- 1676 posts since 17 Dec, 2002 from Yorkshire
I think the pricing was about $50 (but I might be seriously wrong). VSTs are actually special versions of VST format from what I recall. So it's not like you copy paste dll into IP and off you go. But nevertheless it seems to be an actual tool to work with. We'll see. Possibly it is worth dropping a line to the dev asking about release date if you are really interested.
- KVRAF
- 7374 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
I was just invited to apply to be a beta tester, so my guess is that they are in the beta/pre-release stage of things. I won't be applying, because I've got too many other things going on right now, but I don't think it will be too long before it is ready to be released.bronxsound wrote:well i don't know as i don't have the hardware and not following the product. but it would be one of the main reasons to get ip3 for me. so far the best i've seen anyway...
--Sean
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
-
- KVRAF
- 1676 posts since 17 Dec, 2002 from Yorkshire
- KVRAF
- 7374 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
From what I understand, the App will be $49, and the VST plugins will be provided as "in-store" add-ons. The VST stuff is a little different with iOS, because of how the apps are sandboxed. I'm not sure if other programs are able to use the VST apps that are provided from one app's in-store add-on (I've read some people say that it can work and others say it can't work, so it will be interesting to see who is right).Dogboy73 wrote:The end of the video states 1st quarter 2012 for release. They've obviously missed that so who knows when it will appear now. No mention of price either. I imagine it could be a costly App somehow. I'm intrigued to know how it runs VST plug-ins as well (video mentions this & shows the 'Vintage Warmer' plug-in running!!).
Supposedly, the in-store vst addons will cost between $10-$20.
--Sean
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
- KVRAF
- 7374 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
This sounds accurate to me.bronxsound wrote:I think the pricing was about $50 (but I might be seriously wrong). VSTs are actually special versions of VST format from what I recall. So it's not like you copy paste dll into IP and off you go. But nevertheless it seems to be an actual tool to work with. We'll see. Possibly it is worth dropping a line to the dev asking about release date if you are really interested.
--Sean
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
