aux send return issues t2
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
Well lets talk about this. Is there a huge problem with native t2 aux send , returns? I'd prefer to use the native sends over senderella if possible.
ROnC
ROnC
-
- KVRAF
- 1615 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
they aren't really useable.
-
- KVRAF
- 4644 posts since 28 Nov, 2002 from Chicago
I wouldn't say that.
For just one or two send busses they are fine. More than that and the latency starts rattling upwards.
I generally run at 5ms, so a single reverb send ups my latency to 10ms which is perfectly usable.
Processing power is cheap enough that I never use sends for delays or chorus. I'd rather have finer control over each chorus/delay effect to tweak it to the track it is on. As such one send bus is typically all I need.
For just one or two send busses they are fine. More than that and the latency starts rattling upwards.
I generally run at 5ms, so a single reverb send ups my latency to 10ms which is perfectly usable.
Processing power is cheap enough that I never use sends for delays or chorus. I'd rather have finer control over each chorus/delay effect to tweak it to the track it is on. As such one send bus is typically all I need.
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!
-
- KVRAF
- 4644 posts since 28 Nov, 2002 from Chicago
(which is not to say that the added latency incurred by racks and sends is something that should be ignored).
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
so its true then. I cant do pro mixes with native sends? why wasnt this all addressed i mean before release? I dont get it.
-
- KVRAF
- 6741 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Obviously not.rpc9943 wrote: I dont get it.
A 'pro' mix is one you get paid for..
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
What is this 'pro mixes' thing you speak of? ie.what exactly are you doing?
If you add the sends when mixing down, wouldn't latency not really be that big an issue? Are you using T2 to mix live music?
I personally only use one send as well for reverb, and then don't use that on every track. I totally agree it needs fixing though.
Why would you rather not use Senderella?
If you add the sends when mixing down, wouldn't latency not really be that big an issue? Are you using T2 to mix live music?
I personally only use one send as well for reverb, and then don't use that on every track. I totally agree it needs fixing though.
Why would you rather not use Senderella?
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- 6741 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
FWIW, the only plug I use that is hungry enough to make it worth sharing as a send is SIR.. so it always gets dropped into a rack for PDC's sake.
Everything else I run as track or group inserts, as you get more control, and it makes freezing and rendering more useful..
Everything else I run as track or group inserts, as you get more control, and it makes freezing and rendering more useful..
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
because i want to use native hehe... okay wait so the latency is just when listening right? not when exporting? thats what im worrying about, if you want to know about my mixing click on my link
ROnC
ROnC
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
ive been talking to friends and he suggested bussing everything out though. vocal tracks, out to blockfish, etc insstead of doing it per track. my cpu eats up so much i work on mixing down stuff like 24 tracks and it can get tough, and im sick of freezing etc
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
ron, I'd suggest investing in a new laptop. Even a cheap, cheap one would be a lot faster than your 500MHz one.
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- 6741 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
That's sub-groups, not sends. Tracktion's sub-grouping pisses all over the 'pro' appsrpc9943 wrote: ive been talking to friends and he suggested bussing everything out though. vocal tracks, out to blockfish, etc insstead of doing it per track.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
its not my 500mhz im talking about when i say that, thats just for recording. my workstation is at home on my amd64 3000+
how do i subgroup please
RonC
how do i subgroup please
RonC
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
Actually, it sounds like he's saying his friend recommends putting inserts on subgroups.platinumears wrote:That's sub-groups, not sends. Tracktion's sub-grouping pisses all over the 'pro' appsrpc9943 wrote: ive been talking to friends and he suggested bussing everything out though. vocal tracks, out to blockfish, etc insstead of doing it per track.
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
nonono hold on now seriously. okay i want to have all my vocal tracks go out to one instance of blockfish. say i have like 6 vocal tracks, youre saying i create a subgroup? i didnt know T2 even had subgrouping or whatever, i thought that was called a send bus?!?!?! arghhhh
how do i do subgroups
RONC
how do i do subgroups
RONC