Waves NLS Non-Linear Summer released
-
- KVRAF
- 1580 posts since 22 Apr, 2011 from The House of Zaid
Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
-
- KVRian
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
A fresh insert is necessary to use a different channel for each instance. You could click+drag an instance to another fx bin but it will use that same channel.bduffy wrote:Not sure what to make of NLS so far. Because they recommend you're supposed to instantiate each insert fresh from the plug-in menu (as opposed to copying), it can be quite a bitch to get all your inserts going in a full project*.
From playing around (still need to find a good project to properly level and use this with), I haven't heard anything amazing yet, but it seems very subtle at lower levels. The first "Spike" (SSL) emu gets dirty quickly if pushed, making a "grumbly" sort of distortion that I would avoid using. "Mike" sounds a little more mid-low, and the Nevo algo sounded a little sweeter on top. But need to play with it more.
*They said you can insert multiple instances of the plug-in in Cubase at once my holding down alt/option+shift, but that didn't work for me...
If you insert a new instance in X1 it automatically goes to the next open channel.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Yeah, that's what I'm saying: you can't click-drag to another channel, or that instance of NLS uses the identical channel modeling.Lenticular wrote:A fresh insert is necessary to use a different channel for each instance. You could click+drag an instance to another fx bin but it will use that same channel.bduffy wrote:Not sure what to make of NLS so far. Because they recommend you're supposed to instantiate each insert fresh from the plug-in menu (as opposed to copying), it can be quite a bitch to get all your inserts going in a full project*.
From playing around (still need to find a good project to properly level and use this with), I haven't heard anything amazing yet, but it seems very subtle at lower levels. The first "Spike" (SSL) emu gets dirty quickly if pushed, making a "grumbly" sort of distortion that I would avoid using. "Mike" sounds a little more mid-low, and the Nevo algo sounded a little sweeter on top. But need to play with it more.
*They said you can insert multiple instances of the plug-in in Cubase at once my holding down alt/option+shift, but that didn't work for me...
If you insert a new instance in X1 it automatically goes to the next open channel.
Is Sonar different? Not sure what your point is.
-
- KVRist
- 129 posts since 25 Sep, 2008 from London, UK
That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.@midnight wrote:Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
I honestly believe the exact opposite of that statement is true. RBass/MaxxBass are probably the only exceptions.
-
- Banned
- 395 posts since 21 Dec, 2010 from Vermont, USA
so how's the aliasing...?

- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
That was pretty troll-y. I suspect the truth lies somewhere between.daxliniere wrote:That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.@midnight wrote:Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
I honestly believe the exact opposite of that statement is true. RBass/MaxxBass are probably the only exceptions.
-
- KVRist
- 129 posts since 25 Sep, 2008 from London, UK
I just think that with the quality of product available from the likes of FabFilter, PSP Audioware, UAD, Voxengo, Bootsy and the plethora of other small developers, Waves' products are pretty poor by comparison.bduffy wrote:That was pretty troll-y. I suspect the truth lies somewhere between.daxliniere wrote:That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.@midnight wrote:Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
I honestly believe the exact opposite of that statement is true. RBass/MaxxBass are probably the only exceptions.
Of course there's a lot of opinion involved, but RBass, RVox and Vocal Rider are the only plugins I'm aware of that aren't outdone by another product.
Last edited by daxliniere on Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
That's what I meant, you can insert multiple instances with click+drag but it won't go to the next open channel.bduffy wrote:Yeah, that's what I'm saying: you can't click-drag to another channel, or that instance of NLS uses the identical channel modeling.Lenticular wrote:A fresh insert is necessary to use a different channel for each instance. You could click+drag an instance to another fx bin but it will use that same channel.bduffy wrote:Not sure what to make of NLS so far. Because they recommend you're supposed to instantiate each insert fresh from the plug-in menu (as opposed to copying), it can be quite a bitch to get all your inserts going in a full project*.
From playing around (still need to find a good project to properly level and use this with), I haven't heard anything amazing yet, but it seems very subtle at lower levels. The first "Spike" (SSL) emu gets dirty quickly if pushed, making a "grumbly" sort of distortion that I would avoid using. "Mike" sounds a little more mid-low, and the Nevo algo sounded a little sweeter on top. But need to play with it more.
*They said you can insert multiple instances of the plug-in in Cubase at once my holding down alt/option+shift, but that didn't work for me...
If you insert a new instance in X1 it automatically goes to the next open channel.
Is Sonar different? Not sure what your point is.
I also notice a bit of strange behavior in X1. It doesn't always go to the next open channel, doesn't correct itself if you delete instances either. I have to purge it by closing/re-opening the project.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Sorry, looking back at that, I meant that the original Waves-fanboy poster was being (perhaps unwittingly?) troll-y. I just typed that and ran off to a meeting.daxliniere wrote:I just think that with the quality of product available from the likes of FabFilter, PSP Audioware, UAD, Voxengo, Bootsy and the plethora of other small developers, Waves' products are a pretty poor comparison.bduffy wrote:That was pretty troll-y. I suspect the truth lies somewhere between.daxliniere wrote:That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.@midnight wrote:Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
I honestly believe the exact opposite of that statement is true. RBass/MaxxBass are probably the only exceptions.
Of course there's a lot of opinion involved, but RBass, RVox and Vocal Rider are the only plugins I'm aware of that aren't outdone by another product.
Yeah, well, it's just very subjective. The Fabfilter stuff is very different, too, and just wouldn't jibe with some people (not me, I love them). But I know what you mean. (They're also very expensive, a charge often levied against Waves.)
As a committed Waves user, I just find they bring a certain reliability and level of quality to their plugins that keeps me coming back. But of course, Fabfilter and other companies have superior offerings in some categories, that's why I don't use only Waves!
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
How do you know if it's going to the next open channel?Lenticular wrote:That's what I meant, you can insert multiple instances with click+drag but it won't go to the next open channel.bduffy wrote:Yeah, that's what I'm saying: you can't click-drag to another channel, or that instance of NLS uses the identical channel modeling.Lenticular wrote:A fresh insert is necessary to use a different channel for each instance. You could click+drag an instance to another fx bin but it will use that same channel.bduffy wrote:Not sure what to make of NLS so far. Because they recommend you're supposed to instantiate each insert fresh from the plug-in menu (as opposed to copying), it can be quite a bitch to get all your inserts going in a full project*.
From playing around (still need to find a good project to properly level and use this with), I haven't heard anything amazing yet, but it seems very subtle at lower levels. The first "Spike" (SSL) emu gets dirty quickly if pushed, making a "grumbly" sort of distortion that I would avoid using. "Mike" sounds a little more mid-low, and the Nevo algo sounded a little sweeter on top. But need to play with it more.
*They said you can insert multiple instances of the plug-in in Cubase at once my holding down alt/option+shift, but that didn't work for me...
If you insert a new instance in X1 it automatically goes to the next open channel.
Is Sonar different? Not sure what your point is.
I also notice a bit of strange behavior in X1. It doesn't always go to the next open channel, doesn't correct itself if you delete instances either. I have to purge it by closing/re-opening the project.
-
- KVRAF
- 1580 posts since 22 Apr, 2011 from The House of Zaid
It was pretty troll-y sounding but it is my honest opinion.bduffy wrote:That was pretty troll-y. I suspect the truth lies somewhere between.daxliniere wrote:That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.@midnight wrote:Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
I honestly believe the exact opposite of that statement is true. RBass/MaxxBass are probably the only exceptions.
I think the Waves versions of the SSL, API, 1176, and LA2A sound better than UA's or Softube's. I also think their tape sims sound better than the UAD, I think they overdrive is more pleasant and just sound "tapier" even if at the expense of complete authenticity. Their Puigchild compressor has enough love in the industry that Waves made a hardware version of it. The company obviously does something right when it comes to signal processing.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Hey man, you're preaching to the choir. I'm just saying: saying that Waves does everything better than everyone else around KVR will start a flame war faster than gasoline.@midnight wrote:It was pretty troll-y sounding but it is my honest opinion.bduffy wrote:That was pretty troll-y. I suspect the truth lies somewhere between.daxliniere wrote:That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.@midnight wrote:Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
I honestly believe the exact opposite of that statement is true. RBass/MaxxBass are probably the only exceptions.
I think the Waves versions of the SSL, API, 1176, and LA2A sound better than UA's or Softube's. I also think their tape sims sound better than the UAD, I think they overdrive is more pleasant and just sound "tapier" even if at the expense of complete authenticity. Their Puigchild compressor has enough love in the industry that Waves made a hardware version of it. The company obviously does something right when it comes to signal processing.
-
- KVRist
- 129 posts since 25 Sep, 2008 from London, UK
Yep, well said, mate.bduffy wrote:Sorry, looking back at that, I meant that the original Waves-fanboy poster was being (perhaps unwittingly?) troll-y. I just typed that and ran off to a meeting.daxliniere wrote:I just think that with the quality of product available from the likes of FabFilter, PSP Audioware, UAD, Voxengo, Bootsy and the plethora of other small developers, Waves' products are a pretty poor comparison.bduffy wrote:That was pretty troll-y. I suspect the truth lies somewhere between.daxliniere wrote:That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.@midnight wrote:Waves always seems to top what other companies do with their plugins, I'm sure this will be no different.
I honestly believe the exact opposite of that statement is true. RBass/MaxxBass are probably the only exceptions.
Of course there's a lot of opinion involved, but RBass, RVox and Vocal Rider are the only plugins I'm aware of that aren't outdone by another product.
Yeah, well, it's just very subjective. The Fabfilter stuff is very different, too, and just wouldn't jibe with some people (not me, I love them). But I know what you mean. (They're also very expensive, a charge often levied against Waves.)
As a committed Waves user, I just find they bring a certain reliability and level of quality to their plugins that keeps me coming back. But of course, Fabfilter and other companies have superior offerings in some categories, that's why I don't use only Waves!
-
- KVRian
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
Top of the channel, where presets A/B it will have the console name & numberbduffy wrote: How do you know if it's going to the next open channel?
visible. ( A: Spike 01, you can also use the forward/ back arrows to move through channels quickly)
It advances every time you insert an instance only it doesn't always do it sequentially & will skip channels.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]

