|
|||
Hi,
Is Presonus 'Studio One Pro (v2)' much more efficient than Cubase 6.5 on Mac OSX (Lion) ? or are they pretty much equal as far as VST efficiency, and latency goes ? Any feedback, or tests done comparing both when loaded with a good number of VSTs ? Thanks, Muziksculp |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Member: #82129 | ||
|
|||
Without a doubt, yes.
I tried multiple comparison tests just a couple of weeks ago and Cubase choked hard quite quickly comparatively. It was almost as bad as Pro Tools (which is saying something - I love PT 10 though when used with Vienna Ensemble Pro). Logic and Reaper still beat S1v2 I think in terms of efficiency, but I haven't run into an issue on S1v2 in terms of running out on my Mac Pro yet. It is plenty efficient enough - I don't know if I can say the same thing about Cubase. Plus, without the easy bounce in place functionality of Logic / S1v2, I think even the "saving CPU workflow" of Cubase isn't as good. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Nov 2005 Member: #87308 Location: Los Angeles | ||
|
|||
Thanks for the feedback.
I wonder if there is a major performance difference with S1-Pro v2 running on Mac vs PC ? or is it pretty much the same, or slightly better on PC ? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Member: #82129 | ||
|
|||
This is why I wish someone could give me a free Studio One version 2 license: I have Cubase on a macbook pro, so the CPU problems are omnipresent. heh.... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 Sep 2010 Member: #240426 |
| KVR Forum Index » Hosts (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group







