Absolutely stunning, much better then the Lexicon PCM, at least for me.Uncle E wrote:UAD Lexicon 224
Valhalla close second, still king of the hill in many cases.
Absolutely stunning, much better then the Lexicon PCM, at least for me.Uncle E wrote:UAD Lexicon 224
Correctmr president wrote:well thats told metehlord wrote:I'd suggest they're all rubbish if you don't know what you're doing.
----
interest is a matter of opinion, opinion irrelevant to anyone, apart from those who have interest, therefore, what does it matter?
EAReckon EAReverb and the free Epicverb (pc only) should also be on your testing list!supracg wrote:Thanks for the help guys, I searched around a little I was looking for an algorithmic verb. I tried the Valhalla and the Redline and to me the Redline is better for a more in your face type sound without getting to muddy, while valhalla can give a good atmospheric feel. But thats what I've got so far in testing
finally a reasonable answer to the reverb question. I came to the following conclusion. The quality of algorithms varies a bit, but the differences are exaggerated. I have the impression that some algos just internally apply some eq and some not. so with eq you can "cure" a lot about the sound of most reverbs. that's why reverbs with separate inbuilt eq for early and late reflections are my preference.ariston wrote:Why not do a search? Reverbs have been discussed to death here. Press on and you'll hear the following: Lexicon, Aether, Breeze, Arts Acoustic, Redline, Eos, Valhalla Room, Breverb, or "stick with Space Designer, it's awesome". None of which will leave you any the wiser.
As a suggestion: maybe it's not a different reverb that you need, but some basic mixing techniques (like EQing the ins and/or outs of the 'verb, or saturating and/or compressing the reverbed signal, etc.).
Sometimes it's a good idea to go for a (filtered) delay/echo instead of a reverb. This technique is good for leads, be they vocals or synth/guitar lines, since it doesn't clutter the mix as much as a reverb would.
I tend to get worked up about reverbs as much as anyone, straining my ears to hear those "huge" differences. A sober look (or listen) tells me that the differences are, as you say, exaggerated. It used to be different; some of the first algorithmic reverbs were not very good. Nowadays, though, we're really spoiled for choice, with a couple of freebies and very cheap plugins holding their own. I really believe the idea of having to treat a reverb much as you would treat any other track while mixing needs more attention.AKJ wrote: finally a reasonable answer to the reverb question. I came to the following conclusion. The quality of algorithms varies a bit, but the differences are exaggerated. I have the impression that some algos just internally apply some eq and some not. so with eq you can "cure" a lot about the sound of most reverbs. that's why reverbs with separate inbuilt eq for early and late reflections are my preference.
well thats told meMFXxx wrote:Correctmr president wrote:well thats told metehlord wrote:I'd suggest they're all rubbish if you don't know what you're doing.
----
interest is a matter of opinion, opinion irrelevant to anyone, apart from those who have interest, therefore, what does it matter?
Yes these are also good reverbs.I use both of these from time to time and compliment my algo reverbs (EAReverb, ValhallaRoom, Redline Reverb and Epicverb) nicely!LeVzi wrote:
I am using IR's a lot more now with REVerence in Cubase, so convolution verbs are becoming popular with me again. SIR is a good verb for that, and Reverberate (I believe)
WHAT?!!! Why I oughta...*shakes fists at laptop screen while muttering incoherently*darsho wrote: Every Reverb is the best, the only reverb that sucks big time is Valhalla.
Seriously, don't try it, it is just sooo bad...a waste of time to even demo it.
Every other reverb is much better.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026