|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Member: #10972 Location: Canada | ||
|
|||
I'll be a first time 2C buyer too, when and if I buy, that is.
I know you probably can't say for certain, but is it safe to say B2 won't be cheaper than this intro offer for the next year, for example if there are holiday or other sales? Also, what are 2C's resale and license transfer policies? Yes, I looked on the new website. Maybe it was there in Latin, which is Greek to me, or something like that. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Feb 2012 Member: #274692 | ||
|
|||
I bought Aether here at KVR second hand. There was a $50 transfer fee, and it became NFR. I would imagine that is still the case, although I haven't checked. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Jul 2009 Member: #210853 | ||
|
|||
Windsurfer25x wrote: Thanks Andrew, for considering it. Your customers would appreciate being appreciated!
All of our customers are already deeply appreciated. But if we neglected to calculate all the various trajectories to get: from A to X From A + B to X from A to Y From A + B to Y From C to Y etc... ...then we can consider what is best. We do listen to you guys. We just also have to balance it with what is possible realistically with our infrastructure... Evaluating... ---- Andrew Souter ____________________________ 2CAudio | www.2CAudio.com Galbanum | www.galbanum.com |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Member: #189147 | ||
|
|||
After overcoming my initial disappointment ("aNother reverb"), I have to say I'm deeply thrilled by B2. It sounds awesome... love the distortion algos ("wood"!!), the topology, the overall sound. There's a lot of creative potential in there, to be sure. Thick or airy, solid or moving, it does it all in a highly usable, musical, unobtrusive manner.
Can't wait for the manual, though... those filter types are head-scratchers. Only real drawback for me right now is that I'm kind of disenchanted with Aether in comparison, but I'm sure I'll get back to it when the newness thing has passed. This one's a keeper. Great work, guys. There goes my plugin money for August. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Jun 2009 Member: #210358 Location: in a one-story town | ||
|
|||
ariston wrote: .. those filter types are head-scratchers.
They are not really filter-types, in the sense that each has a specific or individual character. I think they are simply the same filter with various EQ curves, such that bp would stand for band-pass, Br stands for band-reject (notch), then you have a few Hi C and Lo C for hi-cut and lo-cut and then the addition of Hi and Lo Z which I think is just a major and sudden attenuation of corresponding freq (if you look at the graph). The Z curves are a nice addition IMO, short of being able to set the curves oneself BUT I would assume this affect the quality of the output if not done carefully and that is why there is a sort of pre-selection options. Quote: Only real drawback for me right now is that I'm kind of disenchanted with Aether in comparison, but I'm sure I'll get back to it when the newness thing has passed.
Don't be. It's not even the same animal so don't feel like you are losing a verb. Aether definitely still fills its post. Think nice hi-quality real spaces (with config) with very flexible damping and reflection mixing and such (but also able to be twisted up when desired!) Quote: There goes my plugin money for August.
You add a new one monthly? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Member: #87729 Location: sweden | ||
|
|||
Galbanum wrote: BTW, this stuff is great:
http://www.2caudio.com/network/artists these are all full interviews in case you guys missed it. Good insights on using reverb and other production techniques in general... We will add a bunch more over time... Wow! the aether "bee flying wet" sound is incredible! Listen on this page: http://www.2caudio.com/products/theperfectstorm How would one take a sound like that dry bee sound and get what is played in that example? That is some sweet sound! BTW, I am still considering b2 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Member: #38664 Location: Charlotte, NC USA | ||
|
|||
Galbanum wrote: RE is it Breeze 2.0, or why is it not Aether 2.0, etc...
Andrew, thanks for that lengthy and highly informative post! I agree, 2CAudio does know reverbs! Great stuff, and thanks for considering our comments, complaints, whatever. Don't let the uprgrade pricing whining fool you, we all love your work. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Member: #38664 Location: Charlotte, NC USA | ||
|
|||
snigelx wrote: Galbanum wrote: a few quick points: 2) The audio demos...
Those audio demos are LUSH. Real talent. I couldn't hear the details of the verb for being lost in the tracks themmselves on a deeper non-technical level. That last demo on the page, titled "OH" just takes me out to space...nice. Yes, that "OH" demo is quite nice, for sure. I will continue to dive into the demo, I see Andrew said something about "evaluating," so I will wait a bit and see what the outcome is. I'm very close to buying though, very nice indeed. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Member: #38664 Location: Charlotte, NC USA | ||
|
|||
Galbanum wrote: BTW, this stuff is great:
http://www.2caudio.com/network/artists these are all full interviews in case you guys missed it. Good insights on using reverb and other production techniques in general... We will add a bunch more over time... My favorite bit of advice so far comes from Rik Simpson ... Quote: ... don't smoke weed when applying reverb (and for that matter delay), the results can be disastrous...
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Member: #270417 | ||
|
|||
billcarroll wrote: My favorite bit of advice so far comes from Rik Simpson ... Quote: ... don't smoke weed when applying reverb (and for that matter delay), the results can be disastrous...
Given that there is medical marijuana, surely it's only a matter of time before there is sound engineer's marijuana and producer's marijuana - genetically engineered to reduce mixing anxiety. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2001 Member: #1279 Location: my bolthole in the south pacific | ||
|
|||
billcarroll wrote: Galbanum wrote: BTW, this stuff is great: http://www.2caudio.com/network/artists
My favorite bit of advice so far comes from Rik Simpson ... these are all full interviews in case you guys missed it. Good insights on using reverb and other production techniques in general... We will add a bunch more over time... Quote: ... don't smoke weed when applying reverb (and for that matter delay), the results can be disastrous... ...And don't drop LSD while mixing delay-based fx either. Even at 0% mix you will still think you need to reduce the feedback or decay |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Member: #87729 Location: sweden | ||
|
|||
Couple basic questions since ti might be a few days til I can try it out:
-How is cpu usage? Fair to say if you're using both engines that it's around twice that of breeze? Someone mentioned that it was fairly economical but that would put it up around Aether if my math is right. -Do the extra effects (saturation, compression etc.) apply just to the reverb, or the dry signal as well? Just trying to figure out if it's a multi-effect or a reverb type effect where extra effects get applied to the verb. ---- This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit. Once I have something clever, I will certainly fill it in. Last edited by Echoes in the Attic on Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 May 2008 Member: #180417 | ||
|
|||
snigelx wrote: ...And don't drop LSD while mixing delay-based fx either. Even at 0% mix you will still think you need to reduce the feedback or decay I think we can summarize with: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIcnBccjgMw ---- Andrew Souter ____________________________ 2CAudio | www.2CAudio.com Galbanum | www.galbanum.com |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Member: #189147 | ||
|
|||
Galbanum wrote: snigelx wrote: ...And don't drop LSD while mixing delay-based fx either. Even at 0% mix you will still think you need to reduce the feedback or decay |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Member: #87729 Location: sweden |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group








