Kubik by COFX
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Discuss this fantastic synth here...
- KVRAF
- 37531 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Great synth but:
needs an update and
needs a Mac version
needs an update and
needs a Mac version
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
An OSX version was released more than two years ago. 
- KVRAF
- 37531 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Oh wow so it was. I thought all COFX stuff was Win only. I own the Win version, how do I get the Mac version then?
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
actually I'm not quite sure - if in doubt, simply contact Jon, I'd say... 
Kubik 2.5 is the only COFX plugin which:
- has been coded in C++ instead of Delphi
- was developed and released after RPCX was founded
- is avaliable for OSX
Kubik 2.5 is the only COFX plugin which:
- has been coded in C++ instead of Delphi
- was developed and released after RPCX was founded
- is avaliable for OSX
-
- KVRian
- 995 posts since 25 Apr, 2005
I was disappointed with the sound, it has the potential to be a fantastic synth but sounds very digital and metallic. I had problems with the gui becoming unresponsive too. It is a shame Jon didn't develop it further and improve it.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Personally I think it can sound like almost anything. Hence I would not describe it as 'digital and metallic' at all - it can do that too, but it can also sound very organic, breathy, analog-like, warm, beautyful. It's simply put a wonderful instrument.
- KVRAF
- 37531 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
That's one of the good things about it, although it can be both.Caco wrote:I was disappointed with the sound, it has the potential to be a fantastic synth but sounds very digital and metallic.
- KVRist
- 355 posts since 24 Oct, 2007 from the bavarian badlands
I simply love Kubik. You can come very close to the sound of a Microwave2 (i own two MicrowaveXTs). It only lacks some "grit" from the hardware (the Microwave cuts thru every mix), in return Kubik can sound more "hi-fi".
+ great possibilities of creating your own waves/wavetables with additive synthesis
+ creating wavetables by resynthesizing samples (works best with samples without detuning/phasing)
+ broad range of sounds possible from digital to analog-like, from clean to dirty
+ low price
o you need to get used to the signal flow and modulation matrix
- the gui is sometimes a bit sluggish (on my computer win7/64)
- it's a shame that it won't be updated any more
Kubik sounds at least twice as good when you put some Valhalla Übermod or stw ReflexPro on it.
Cheers,
Gerald
+ great possibilities of creating your own waves/wavetables with additive synthesis
+ creating wavetables by resynthesizing samples (works best with samples without detuning/phasing)
+ broad range of sounds possible from digital to analog-like, from clean to dirty
+ low price
o you need to get used to the signal flow and modulation matrix
- the gui is sometimes a bit sluggish (on my computer win7/64)
- it's a shame that it won't be updated any more
Kubik sounds at least twice as good when you put some Valhalla Übermod or stw ReflexPro on it.
Cheers,
Gerald
EAT - SLEEP - SYNTH
http://soundcloud.com/pocvecem
http://soundcloud.com/pocvecem
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
imo it pisses all over it... Kubik is incredibly powerful - there are few synths with as many modulation possibilites - e.g. the LFOs are on a league of their own, then there are sequencers, multistage-envelopes, etc. ... the modulators themselves can also be modulated
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
ttoz wrote:i'm in the minority it seems as i agree with you. Just don't dig the actual sound at all. It has this weird thing to it which i can't explain but just sounds harshCaco wrote:I was disappointed with the sound, it has the potential to be a fantastic synth but sounds very digital and metallic. I had problems with the gui becoming unresponsive too. It is a shame Jon didn't develop it further and improve it.
like I already mentioned, Kubik doesn't so much have a sound of its own as many other synths have . it so much depends on your wavetables and how you modulate them, how you tweak the envelopes and the LFOs, also the OSc mode, etc. - actually it's very modular - Kubik is more like a small and tidy yet very smartly equipped toolbox.
It may sound bad, broken, harsh digital and what not - but then that's you...
-
- KVRist
- 52 posts since 19 Apr, 2011 from New Zealand
I LOVE the KUBIK! It's great for jamming live IMO. also as was said above it's a great little toolbox who's sound fits into most any mix.
It needs to be updated. I fear I won't be able to play it on whatever operating system is down the road and that thought makes me sad...
It needs to be updated. I fear I won't be able to play it on whatever operating system is down the road and that thought makes me sad...
- KVRAF
- 13997 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Seattle
I'll + all the good things said. It is an amazing tool.
I'm not a musician, but I've designed sounds that others use to make music. http://soundcloud.com/obsidiananvil

